Jose Heredia-Jimenez

Dr. Jose Heredia-Jimenez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2011 in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Germán Vicente-RodríguezGermán Vicente-Rodríguez
Germán Vicente-Rodríguez
JRJuan P Rey-López
Juan P Rey-López
Jonatan RuizJonatan Ruiz
Jonatan Ruiz
David Jiménez PavónDavid Jiménez Pavón
David Jiménez Pavón
PBPatrick Bergman
Patrick Bergman
FOFrancisco B. Ortega
Francisco B. Ortega
59-2063, 2011—The aim of this study was to examine the interrater reliability (trained vs. untrained raters) and criterion-related validity (manual vs. automatic timing) of the 4 × 10-m shuttle run and 30-m running speed tests (times measured). The study comprised 85 adolescents (38 girls) aged 13.0-16.9 years from the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence study. The time required to complete the 4 × 10-m shuttle run and 30-m running tests was simultaneously measured (a) manually with a stopwatch by both trained and untrained raters (for interrater reliability analysis), and (b) by using photoelectric cells (for validity analysis). Systematic error, random error, and heteroscedasticity were studied with repeated-measured analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots. The systematic error for untrained vs. trained raters and the untrained raters vs. photoelectric cells were in all cases ∼0.1 seconds (p < 0.01), that is, untrained raters recorded higher times. No systematic error was found between trained raters and photoelectric cells (p > 0.05). No heteroscedasticity was shown in any case (p > 0.05). The findings indicate that manual measurements by a trained rater, using a stopwatch, seem to be a valid method to assess speed and agility fitness testing in adolescents. Researchers must be trained to minimize the measurement error....

1 January 2011 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VAVirginia A Aparicio
Virginia A Aparicio
FOFrancisco B. Ortega
Francisco B. Ortega
JHJose Heredia-Jimenez
Jose Heredia-Jimenez
ABANA CARBONELL BAEZA
ANA CARBONELL BAEZA
MSMichael Sjöström
Michael Sjöström
MDManuel Delgado-Fernandez
Manuel Delgado-Fernandez

24 January 2009 in Clinical Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJose Heredia-Jimenez
Jose Heredia-Jimenez
VAVirginia A Aparicio
Virginia A Aparicio
JPJesus Porres
Jesus Porres
MFManuel Delgado Fernández
Manuel Delgado Fernández
VHVictor M. Soto Hermoso
Victor M. Soto Hermoso

9 November 2010 in British Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VAVirginia A Aparicio
Virginia A Aparicio
ENElena Nebot
Elena Nebot
JPJesus Porres
Jesus Porres
FOFrancisco B. Ortega
Francisco B. Ortega
JHJose Heredia-Jimenez
Jose Heredia-Jimenez
PRPilar Aranda Ramírez
Pilar Aranda Ramírez
Consumption of high-protein (HP) diets is postulated to exert a negative influence on bone and renal health. However, no conclusive evidence has been presented related to this issue or to the potential protective action of resistance training on HP-induced systemic effects. We examined the effects of HP diet consumption on food intake, body-weight gain, body composition, and renal, bone and metabolic parameters of rats performing resistance training. A total of ninety-six adult male Wistar rats were randomly distributed in twelve experimental groups (n8): normal-protein (10 %) or HP (45 %) diets, with or without resistance training, killed for experimental periods of 1, 2 or 3 months. Diets were based on a commercial whey protein hydrolysate. Consumption of HP diets and resistance training significantly affected food intake, body weight and body composition, as well as the plasma levels of total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and TAG. The buffering action of resistance training on such diet-induced alterations was especially evident in the levels of plasma TAG. Consumption of HP diets led to a considerable increase in kidney weight, urinary volume and acidity, as well as in the urinary excretion of Ca, with a parallel reduction in the urinary excretion of citrate (P < 0·05). No apparent deleterious effect on bone mineral content was found. In conclusion, consumption of HP diets caused alterations in renal health status and some metabolic parameters, but did not seem to affect bone status. Resistance training had a protective action against alterations of renal health status and some metabolic parameters such as plasma TAG.

1 March 2016 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJose Heredia-Jimenez
Jose Heredia-Jimenez
EOEva Orantes-Gonzalez
Eva Orantes-Gonzalez
VSV.M. Soto-Hermoso
V.M. Soto-Hermoso

4 January 2025 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLucía Pilar Vicente Pina
Lucía Pilar Vicente Pina
RRRaquel Recio
Raquel Recio
Loreto Ferrandez LalienaLoreto Ferrandez Laliena
Loreto Ferrandez Laliena
JHJose Heredia-Jimenez
Jose Heredia-Jimenez
JMJulián Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte
Julián Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte
María Orosia Lucha-LópezMaría Orosia Lucha-López
María Orosia Lucha-López
The anatomy of the pelvis may obscure differences in pelvic tilt, potentially underestimating its correlation with clinical measures. Measuring the total sagittal range of pelvic movement can serve as a reliable indicator of pelvic function. This study assessed the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of the Kinovea® version 0.9.5 and its agreement with the Qualisys System (3D motion capture) for measuring the total pelvic range of movement (ROM) in the sagittal plane, establishing Kinovea®’s validity in standing and sitting positions with 45° of hip flexion. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 13 asymptomatic participants. Pelvic kinematics were recorded using both systems. Pelvic posture, anterior and posterior tilt, and total pelvic ROM in the sagittal plane were analyzed. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate reliability and validity. Additionally, the technical error of measurement (TEM), relative TEM, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated to establish Kinovea®’s accuracy. Kinovea® demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-examiner reliability for total pelvic ROM in standing and sitting measurements (ICC > 0.90), with relative TEM values below 10% and MDC values between 1.60°and 11.20°. Validity showed good-to-excellent ICC values when comparing Kinovea® and the Qualisys System. This finding suggests that Kinovea® is a valid tool for obtaining reproducible measurements of total pelvic ROM in the sagittal plane in standing and sitting positions, demonstrating excellent-to-good inter- and intra-examiner reliability for pelvic kinematics.