In urban areas, engineers often need to assess tunnelling-induced displacements of piled structures and the resulting potential for damage. This paper presents an elastic study of tunnel-pile-structure interaction through Winkler-based Two-Stage Analysis Methods (TSAMs), focusing on structural displacements resulting from tunnel excavation beneath piled frames or simple equivalent beams. Comparison of results with 3D finite element analyses shows that the simple TSAM models are able to provide a good assessment of tunnelling-induced building displacements. Parametric analyses highlight the role of tunnel-pile interaction and the superstructure (stiffness, configuration, and pile-structure connections) in the global response of the tunnel-soil-building system. In particular, the effect that key parameters have on deflection ratios and horizontal strains are investigated. Results illustrate how piled foundations increase the risk of structural damage compared to shallow foundations, whereas structural stiffness can reduce building deformations. Flexural deformations are predominately induced by tunnel excavations beneath piles whereas horizontal strains at the ground level are negligible when a continuous foundation is included. Furthermore, it is illustrated that results based on buildings modelled as equivalent beams can differ considerably compared to when they are modelled as framed structures. Simple design charts are provided to estimate horizontal strains and deflection ratio modification factors based on newly defined relative axial and bending stiffness parameters which account for the presence of the piles

Tunnel construction is vital for the development of urban infrastructure systems throughout the world. An understanding of tunnelling-induced displacements is needed to evaluate the impact of tunnel construction on existing structures. Recent research has provided insight into the complex mechanisms that control tunnelling-induced ground movements in sands; however, the combined influence of relative tunnel depth and soil density has not been described. This paper presents data from a series of 15 plane-strain centrifuge tests in dry sand. The cover-to-diameter ratio, C/D, of the tunnels ranges between 1·3 and 6·3, thereby including relatively shallow and deep tunnels. The sand relative density varies between 30 and 90%, corresponding to loose and dense soils. The effects of C/D, soil density and volume loss on vertical and horizontal soil movements, shear strains and ground reaction curves are discussed. Analysis of surface and subsurface settlement trough characteristics shows that the mechanisms are non-linear and the effects of soil relative density and volume loss on deformation patterns are highly dependent on C/D. The role of soil arching in the definition of the displacement mechanisms and a discussion of the implications of the results to the assessment of damage to existing structures are also provided.

Tunneling beneath piled structures may compromise the stability and serviceability of the structure. The assessment of potential structure damage is a problem being faced by engineers across the globe. This paper presents the outcomes of a series of geotechnical centrifuge experiments designed to simulate the effect of excavating a tunnel beneath piled structures. The stiffness and weight effects of piled structures are examined independently using aluminum plates of varying stiffness (equivalent beam approach) and the addition of weights supported by aluminum piles. Greenfield displacement patterns and results from pile loading tests are also provided. The variation of structure displacement profiles with plate stiffness, weight, and tunnel volume loss are used to illustrate the main effects of tunnel-pile interaction and the contribution of the superstructure to the global tunnel-pile-structure interaction. Results indicate that piles have a detrimental role in tunnel-structure interaction problems, whereas the superstructure stiffness and weight can, respectively, reduce and increase structure distortions and settlements. Finally, the potential for structural damage is evaluated by comparing structure and greenfield deflection ratios as well as resulting modification factors. The paper presents a unique set of results and insights that provide valuable guidance to engineers working across the ground and structural engineering disciplines.