Deepak M. Kalaskar

Prof. Dr. Deepak M. Kalaskar

Department of Ortho and MSK Science, Div of Surgery & Interventional Sci, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

57Years (1970-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 June 2023 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HBHarshavardhan Budharaju
Harshavardhan Budharaju
SSShruthy Suresh
Shruthy Suresh
MSMuthu Parkkavi Sekar
Muthu Parkkavi Sekar
BVBrigita De Vega
Brigita De Vega
SSSwaminathan Sethuraman
Swaminathan Sethuraman
Deepak M. KalaskarDeepak M. Kalaskar
Deepak M. Kalaskar

1 January 2021 in Journal of Tissue Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMuthu Parkkavi Sekar
Muthu Parkkavi Sekar
HBHarshavardhan Budharaju
Harshavardhan Budharaju
AZAllen Zennifer
Allen Zennifer
SSSwaminathan Sethuraman
Swaminathan Sethuraman
NVNiki Vermeulen
Niki Vermeulen
Deepak M. KalaskarDeepak M. Kalaskar
Deepak M. Kalaskar
Tissue engineering is an evolving multi-disciplinary field with cutting-edge technologies and innovative scientific perceptions that promise functional regeneration of damaged tissues/organs. Tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs) are biomaterial-cell products or a cell-drug combination which is injected, implanted or topically applied in the course of a therapeutic or diagnostic procedure. Current tissue engineering strategies aim at 3D printing/bioprinting that uses cells and polymers to construct living tissues/organs in a layer-by-layer fashion with high 3D precision. However, unlike conventional drugs or therapeutics, TEMPs and 3D bioprinted tissues are novel therapeutics and need different regulatory protocols for clinical trials and commercialization processes. Therefore, it is essential to understand the complexity of raw materials, cellular components, and manufacturing procedures to establish standards that can help to translate these products from bench to bedside. These complexities are reflected in the regulations and standards that are globally in practice to prevent any compromise or undue risks to patients. This review comprehensively describes the current legislations, standards for TEMPs with a special emphasis on 3D bioprinted tissues. Based on these overviews, challenges in the clinical translation of TEMPs & 3D bioprinted tissues/organs along with their ethical concerns and future perspectives are discussed.

29 August 2020 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAbdullah M. Cakmak
Abdullah M. Cakmak
SUSemra Unal
Semra Unal
ASAli Sahin
Ali Sahin
Faik Nuzhet OktarFaik Nuzhet Oktar
Faik Nuzhet Oktar
Mustafa SengorMustafa Sengor
Mustafa Sengor
Deepak M. KalaskarDeepak M. Kalaskar
Deepak M. Kalaskar
Three-dimensional (3D) printing application is a promising method for bone tissue engineering. For enhanced bone tissue regeneration, it is essential to have printable composite materials with appealing properties such as construct porous, mechanical strength, thermal properties, controlled degradation rates, and the presence of bioactive materials. In this study, polycaprolactone (PCL), gelatin (GEL), bacterial cellulose (BC), and different hydroxyapatite (HA) concentrations were used to fabricate a novel PCL/GEL/BC/HA composite scaffold using 3D printing method for bone tissue engineering applications. Pore structure, mechanical, thermal, and chemical analyses were evaluated. 3D scaffolds with an ideal pore size (~300 µm) for use in bone tissue engineering were generated. The addition of both bacterial cellulose (BC) and hydroxyapatite (HA) into PCL/GEL scaffold increased cell proliferation and attachment. PCL/GEL/BC/HA composite scaffolds provide a potential for bone tissue engineering applications.

19 June 2019 in Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristina Schmidleithner
Christina Schmidleithner
SMSara Malferrari
Sara Malferrari
RPRobert G Palgrave
Robert G Palgrave
DBDaniel Bomze
Daniel Bomze
MSMaertin Schwentenwein
Maertin Schwentenwein
Deepak M. KalaskarDeepak M. Kalaskar
Deepak M. Kalaskar
Bone regeneration requires porous and mechanically stable scaffolds to support tissue integration and angiogenesis, which is essential for bone tissue regeneration. With the advent of additive manufacturing processes, production of complex porous architectures has become feasible. However, a balance has to be sorted between the porous architecture and mechanical stability, which facilitates bone regeneration for load bearing applications. The current study evaluates the use of high resolution digital light processing (DLP) -based additive manufacturing to produce complex but mechanical stable scaffolds based on β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) for bone regeneration. Four different geometries: a rectilinear Grid, a hexagonal Kagome, a Schwarz primitive, and a hollow Schwarz architecture are designed with 400 μm pores and 75 or 50 vol% porosity. However, after initial screening for design stability and mechanical properties, only the rectilinear Grid structure, and the hexagonal Kagome structure are found to be reproducible and showed higher mechanical properties. Micro computed tomography (μ-CT) analysis shows <2 vol% error in porosity and <6% relative deviation of average pore sizes for the Grid structures. At 50 vol% porosity, this architecture also has the highest compressive strength of 44.7 MPa (Weibull modulus is 5.28), while bulk specimens reach 235 ± 37 MPa. To evaluate suitability of 3D scaffolds produced by DLP methods for bone regeneration, scaffolds were cultured with murine preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Short term study showed cell growth over 14 d, with more than two-fold increase of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity compared to cells on 2D tissue culture plastic. Collagen deposition was increased by a factor of 1.5–2 when compared to the 2D controls. This confirms retention of biocompatible and osteo-inductive properties of β-TCP following the DLP process. This study has implications for designing of the high resolution porous scaffolds for bone regenerative applications and contributes to understanding of DLP based additive manufacturing process for medical applications.

1 January 2019 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
URUday Kiran Roopavath
Uday Kiran Roopavath
SMSara Malferrari
Sara Malferrari
AHAnnemieke Van Haver
Annemieke Van Haver
FVFrederik Verstreken
Frederik Verstreken
SRSubha Narayan Rath
Subha Narayan Rath
Deepak M. KalaskarDeepak M. Kalaskar
Deepak M. Kalaskar

10 October 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
CSChristina Schmidleithner
Christina Schmidleithner
Deepak M. KalaskarDeepak M. Kalaskar
Deepak M. Kalaskar
The stereolithography (SLA) process and its methods are introduced in this chapter. After establishing SLA as pertaining to the high-resolution but also high-cost spectrum of the 3D printing technologies, different classifications of SLA processes are presented. Laser-based SLA and digital light processing (DLP), as well as their specialized techniques such as two-photon polymerization (TPP) or continuous liquid interface production (CLIP) are discussed and analyzed for their advantages and shortcomings. Prerequisites of SLA resins and the most common resin compositions are discussed. Furthermore, printable materials and their applications are briefly reviewed, and insight into commercially available SLA systems is given. Finally, an outlook highlighting challenges within the SLA process and propositions to resolve these are offered.