Ingrid Zwertvaegher

Dr. Ingrid Zwertvaegher

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 August 2015 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAnnelies Nuffel
Annelies Nuffel
IZIngrid Zwertvaegher
Ingrid Zwertvaegher
LPLiesbet Pluym
Liesbet Pluym
SWStephanie Van Weyenberg
Stephanie Van Weyenberg
VTVivi M. Thorup
Vivi M. Thorup
WouterSaeys SaeysWouterSaeys Saeys
WouterSaeys Saeys
Due to its detrimental effect on cow welfare, health and production, lameness in dairy cows has received quite a lot of attention in the last few decades—not only in terms of prevention and treatment of lameness but also in terms of detection, as early treatment might decrease the number of severely lame cows in the herds as well as decrease the direct and indirect costs associated with lameness cases. Generally, lame cows are detected by the herdsman, hoof trimmer or veterinarian based on abnormal locomotion, abnormal behavior or the presence of hoof lesions during routine trimming. In the scientific literature, several guidelines are proposed to detect lame cows based on visual interpretation of the locomotion of individual cows (i.e., locomotion scoring systems). Researchers and the industry have focused on automating such observations to support the farmer in finding the lame cows in their herds, but until now, such automated systems have rarely been used in commercial herds. This review starts with the description of normal locomotion of cows in order to define ‘abnormal’ locomotion caused by lameness. Cow locomotion (gait and posture) and behavioral features that change when a cow becomes lame are described and linked to the existing visual scoring systems. In addition, the lack of information of normal cow gait and a clear description of ‘abnormal’ gait are discussed. Finally, the different set-ups used during locomotion scoring and their influence on the resulting locomotion scores are evaluated.

4 November 2008 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDries Bonte
Dries Bonte
JTJustin M. J. Travis
Justin M. J. Travis
NCNele De Clercq
Nele De Clercq
IZIngrid Zwertvaegher
Ingrid Zwertvaegher
LLLuc Lens
Luc Lens
Understanding the causes and consequences of dispersal is a prerequisite for the effective management of natural populations. Rather than treating dispersal as a fixed trait, it should be considered a plastic process that responds to both genetic and environmental conditions. Here, we consider how the ambient temperature experienced by juvenileErigone atra, a spider inhabiting crop habitat, influences adult dispersal. This species exhibits 2 distinct forms of dispersal, ballooning (long distance) and rappelling (short distance). Using a half-sib design we raised individuals under 4 different temperature regimes and quantified the spiders' propensity to balloon and to rappel. Additionally, as an indicator of investment in settlement, we determined the size of the webs build by the spiders following dispersal. The optimal temperature regimes for reproduction and overall dispersal investment were 20 °C and 25 °C. Propensity to perform short-distance movements was lowest at 15 °C, whereas for long-distance dispersal it was lowest at 30 °C. Plasticity in dispersal was in the direction predicted on the basis of the risks associated with seasonal changes in habitat availability; long-distance ballooning occurred more frequently under cooler, spring-like conditions and short-distance rappelling under warmer, summer-like conditions. Based on these findings, we conclude that thermal conditions during development provide juvenile spiders with information about the environmental conditions they are likely to encounter as adults and that this information influences the spider's dispersal strategy. Climate change may result in suboptimal adult dispersal behavior, with potentially deleterious population level consequences.

28 August 2015 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAnnelies Nuffel
Annelies Nuffel
IZIngrid Zwertvaegher
Ingrid Zwertvaegher
SWStephanie Van Weyenberg
Stephanie Van Weyenberg
MPMatti Pastell
Matti Pastell
VTVivi M. Thorup
Vivi M. Thorup
WouterSaeys SaeysWouterSaeys Saeys
WouterSaeys Saeys
Despite the research on opportunities to automatically measure lameness in cattle, lameness detection systems are not widely available commercially and are only used on a few dairy farms. However, farmers need to be aware of the lame cows in their herds in order treat them properly and in a timely fashion. Many papers have focused on the automated measurement of gait or behavioral cow characteristics related to lameness. In order for such automated measurements to be used in a detection system, algorithms to distinguish between non-lame and mildly or severely lame cows need to be developed and validated. Few studies have reached this latter stage of the development process. Also, comparison between the different approaches is impeded by the wide range of practical settings used to measure the gait or behavioral characteristic (e.g., measurements during normal farming routine or during experiments; cows guided or walking at their own speed) and by the different definitions of lame cows. In the majority of the publications, mildly lame cows are included in the non-lame cow group, which limits the possibility of also detecting early lameness cases. In this review, studies that used sensor technology to measure changes in gait or behavior of cows related to lameness are discussed together with practical considerations when conducting lameness research. In addition, other prerequisites for any lameness detection system on farms (e.g., need for early detection, real-time measurements) are discussed.

14 August 2021 in Precision Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco GrellaMarco Grella
Marco Grella
Fabrizio GioelliFabrizio Gioelli
Fabrizio Gioelli
Paolo MaruccoPaolo Marucco
Paolo Marucco
IZIngrid Zwertvaegher
Ingrid Zwertvaegher
ERIC MOZZANINIERIC MOZZANINI
ERIC MOZZANINI
PBPaolo Balsari
Paolo Balsari
The pulse width modulation (PWM) spray system is the most advanced technology to obtain variable rate spray application without varying the operative sprayer parameters (e.g. spray pressure, nozzle size). According to the precision agriculture principles, PWM is the prime technology that allows to spray the required amount where needed without varying the droplet size spectra which benefits both the uniformity of spray quality and the spray drift reduction. However, some concerns related to the effect of on–off solenoid valves and the alternating on/off action of adjacent nozzles on final uneven spray coverage (SC) have arisen. Further evaluations of PWM systems used for spraying 3D crops under field conditions are welcomed. A tower-shaped airblast sprayer equipped with a PWM was tested in a vineyard. Twelve configurations, combining duty cycles (DC: 30, 50, 70, 100%) and forward speeds (FS: 4, 6, 8 km h−1), were tested. Two methodologies, namely field-standardized and real field conditions, were adopted to evaluate the effect of DC and FS on (1) SC variability (CV%) along both the sprayer travel direction and the vertical spray profile using long water sensitive papers (WSP), and (2) SC uniformity (IU, index value) within the canopy at different depths and heights, respectively. Furthermore, the SC (%) and deposit density (Nst, no stains cm−2), determined using short WSP, were used to evaluate the spray application performances taking into account the spray volumes applied. Under field-controlled conditions, the pulsing of the PWM system affects both the SC variability measured along the sprayer travel direction and along the vertical spray profile. In contrast, under real field conditions, the PWM system does not affect the uniformity of SC measured within the canopy. The relationship between SC and Nst allowed identification of the ranges of 200–250 and 300–370 l ha−1 as the most suitable spray volumes to be applied for insecticide and fungicide plant protection products, respectively.

27 February 2009 in Ecological Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDries Bonte
Dries Bonte
NCNele DE Clercq
Nele DE Clercq
IZIngrid Zwertvaegher
Ingrid Zwertvaegher
LLLuc Lens
Luc Lens

31 January 2022 in Crop Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Marco GrellaMarco Grella
Marco Grella
PMPaolo Marucco
Paolo Marucco
IZIngrid Zwertvaegher
Ingrid Zwertvaegher
Fabrizio GioelliFabrizio Gioelli
Fabrizio Gioelli
CBClaudio Bozzer
Claudio Bozzer
PBPaolo Balsari
Paolo Balsari