Raffaella Nori

Prof. Raffaella Nori

Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 March 2018 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Raffaella NoriRaffaella Nori
Raffaella Nori
LPLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi
AMAndrea Maialetti
Andrea Maialetti
MGMirco Goro
Mirco Goro
ARAndrea Rossetti
Andrea Rossetti
Cecilia GuarigliaCecilia Guariglia
Cecilia Guariglia
The present study has two-fold aims: to investigate whether gender differences persist even when more time is given to acquire spatial information; to assess the gender effect when the retrieval phase requires recalling the pathway from the same or a different reference perspective (egocentric or allocentric). Specifically, we analyse the performance of men and women while learning a path from a map or by observing an experimenter in a real environment. We then asked them to reproduce the learned path using the same reference system (map learning vs. map retrieval or real environment learning vs. real environment retrieval) or using a different reference system (map learning vs. real environment retrieval or vice versa). The results showed that gender differences were not present in the retrieval phase when women have the necessary time to acquire spatial information. Moreover, using the egocentric coordinates (both in the learning and retrieval phase) proved easier than the other conditions, whereas learning through allocentric coordinates and then retrieving the environmental information using egocentric coordinates proved to be the most difficult. Results showed that by manipulating familiarity, gender differences disappear, or are attenuated in all conditions.

12 May 2015 in Cognitive Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Raffaella NoriRaffaella Nori
Raffaella Nori
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi

21 October 2024 in Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPierluigi Cordellieri
Pierluigi Cordellieri
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi
MGMarco Giancola
Marco Giancola
AGAnna Maria Giannini
Anna Maria Giannini
Raffaella NoriRaffaella Nori
Raffaella Nori
Background/Objectives: Life expectancies have increased in most countries, leading to a higher accident rate among older drivers than their younger counterparts. While numerous studies have analyzed the decline in cognitive abilities and physical limitations as contributing factors, there are other considerations. For instance, younger male drivers tend to take more risks than younger female drivers. However, there is a lack of research and evidence regarding the role of gender in risk-taking among individuals over 65. Given this gap, our current study aims to investigate the relationship between gender and risk propensity in this particular age group. The primary goal was to determine if driving experience affects the gender gap in risk attitude; Methods: We studied risk behavior in both car drivers and pedestrians. Our sample included 200 individuals (101 women), all over 65, with the same weekly driving times. After a brief demographic and anamnestic interview, they completed the Driver Road Risk Perception Scale (DRPS) and the Pedestrian Behavior Appropriateness Perception Scale (PBAS) questionnaires. They also provided information about traffic violations and road crashes; Results: Our research revealed that older male drivers continue to tend to risky behavior, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to improve risk awareness, especially among older men; Conclusions: Our findings suggest that road safety messages should specifically target male drivers as they are less likely to view responsible driving actions, such as observing speed limits, as desirable.

21 January 2020 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi
Paola GuarigliaPaola Guariglia
Paola Guariglia
Raffaella NoriRaffaella Nori
Raffaella Nori
Massimiliano PalmieroMassimiliano Palmiero
Massimiliano Palmiero
The role of emotional landmarks in navigation has been scarcely studied. Previous findings showed that valence and arousal of landmarks increase landmark’s salience and improve performance in navigational memory tasks. However, no study has directly explored the interplay between valence and arousal of emotionally laden landmarks in embodied and not-embodied navigational tasks. At the aim, 115 college students have been subdivided in five groups according to the landmarks they were exposed (High Positive Landmarks HPL; Low Positive Landmarks LPL; High Negative Landmarks HNL; Low Negative Landmarks LNL and Neutral Landmarks NeuL). In the embodied tasks participants were asked to learn a path in a first-person perspective and to recall it after five minutes, whereas in the not-embodied tasks participants were asked to track the learned path on a silent map and to recognize landmarks among distractors. Results highlighted firstly the key role of valence in the embodied task related to the immediate learning, but not to the delayed recall of the path, probably because of the short retention interval used. Secondly, results showed the importance of the interplay between valence and arousal in the non-embodied tasks, specifically, neutral and high negative emotional landmarks yielded the lowest performance probably because of the avoidance learning effect. Implications for future research directions are discussed.

25 June 2021 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMarco Giancola
Marco Giancola
PVPaola Verde
Paola Verde
LCLuigi Cacciapuoti
Luigi Cacciapuoti
GAGregorio Angelino
Gregorio Angelino
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi
Raffaella NoriRaffaella Nori
Raffaella Nori
Background: Military pilots show advanced visuospatial skills. Previous studies demonstrate that they are better at mentally rotating a target, taking different perspectives, estimating distances and planning travel and have a topographic memory. Here, we compared navigational cognitive styles between military pilots and people without flight experience. Pilots were expected to be more survey-style users than nonpilots, showing more advanced navigational strategies. Method: A total of 106 military jet pilots from the Italian Air Force and 92 nonpilots from the general population matched for education with the pilots were enrolled to investigate group differences in navigational styles. The participants were asked to perform a reduced version of the Spatial Cognitive Style Test (SCST), consisting of six tasks that allow us to distinguish individuals in terms of landmark (people orient themselves by using a figurative memory for environmental objects), route (people use an egocentric representation of the space) and survey (people have a map-like representation of the space) user styles. Results: In line with our hypothesis, military pilots mainly adopt the survey style, whereas nonpilots mainly adopt the route style. In addition, pilots outperformed nonpilots in both the 3D Rotation Task and Map Description Task. Conclusions: Military flight expertise influences some aspects of spatial ability, leading to enhanced human navigation. However, it must be considered that they are a population whose navigational skills were already high at the time of selection at the academy before formal training began.

23 March 2024 in Safety Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Raffaella NoriRaffaella Nori
Raffaella Nori
MZMicaela Maria Zucchelli
Micaela Maria Zucchelli
PCPierluigi Cordellieri
Pierluigi Cordellieri
Alessandro QuaglieriAlessandro Quaglieri
Alessandro Quaglieri
Massimiliano PalmieroMassimiliano Palmiero
Massimiliano Palmiero
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi