The estimation of single tree and complete stand information is one of the central tasks of forest inventory. In recent years, automatic algorithms have been successfully developed for the detection and measurement of trees with laser scanning technology. Nevertheless, most of the forest inventories are nowadays carried out with manual tree measurements using traditional instruments. This is due to the high investment costs for modern laser scanner equipment and, in particular, the time-consuming and incomplete nature of data acquisition with stationary terrestrial laser scanners. Traditionally, forest inventory data are collected through manual surveys with calipers or tapes. Practically, this is both labor and time-consuming. In 2020, Apple implemented a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor in the new Apple iPad Pro (4th Gen) and iPhone Pro 12. Since then, access to LiDAR-generated 3D point clouds has become possible with consumer-level devices. In this study, an Apple iPad Pro was tested to produce 3D point clouds, and its performance was compared with a personal laser scanning (PLS) approach to estimate individual tree parameters in different forest types and structures. Reference data were obtained by traditional measurements on 21 circular forest inventory sample plots with a 7 m radius. The tree mapping with the iPad showed a detection rate of 97.3% compared to 99.5% with the PLS scans for trees with a lower diameter at a breast height (dbh) threshold of 10 cm. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the best dbh measurement out of five different dbh modeling approaches was 3.13 cm with the iPad and 1.59 cm with PLS. The data acquisition time with the iPad was approximately 7.51 min per sample plot; this is twice as long as that with PLS but 2.5 times shorter than that with traditional forest inventory equipment. In conclusion, the proposed forest inventory with the iPad is generally feasible and achieves accurate and precise stem counts and dbh measurements with efficient labor effort compared to traditional approaches. Along with future technological developments, it is expected that other consumer-level handheld devices with integrated laser scanners will also be developed beyond the iPad, which will serve as an accurate and cost-efficient alternative solution to the approved but relatively expensive TLS and PLS systems. Such a development would be mandatory to broadly establish digital technology and fully automated routines in forest inventory practice. Finally, high-level progress is generally expected for the broader scientific community in forest ecosystem monitoring, as the collection of highly precise 3D point cloud data is no longer hindered by financial burdens.

The use of new and modern sensors in forest inventory has become increasingly efficient. Nevertheless, the majority of forest inventory data are still collected manually, as part of field surveys. The reason for this is the sometimes time-consuming and incomplete data acquisition with static terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). The use of personal laser scanning (PLS) can reduce these disadvantages. In this study, we assess a new personal laser scanner and compare it with a TLS approach for the estimation of tree position and diameter in a wide range of forest types and structures. Traditionally collected forest inventory data are used as reference. A new density-based algorithm for position finding and diameter estimation is developed. In addition, several methods for diameter fitting are compared. For circular sample plots with a maximum radius of 20 m and lower diameter at breast height (dbh) threshold of 5 cm, tree mapping showed a detection of 96% for PLS and 78.5% for TLS. Using plot radii of 20 m, 15 m, and 10 m, as well as a lower dbh threshold of 10 cm, the respective detection rates for PLS were 98.76%, 98.95%, and 99.48%, while those for TLS were considerably lower (86.32%, 93.81%, and 98.35%, respectively), especially for larger sample plots. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the best dbh measurement was 2.32 cm (12.01%) for PLS and 2.55 cm (13.19%) for TLS. The highest precision of PLS and TLS, in terms of bias, were 0.21 cm (1.09%) and −0.74 cm (−3.83%), respectively. The data acquisition time for PLS took approximately 10.96 min per sample plot, 4.7 times faster than that for TLS. We conclude that the proposed PLS method is capable of efficient data capture and can detect the largest number of trees with a sufficient dbh accuracy.

The most efficient way to obtain stand inventory data with terrestrial laser systems (TLS) is with the single-scan mode, which involves taking one scan at a single point. With a single-scan setup, there will be a nondetection of trees in a plot and the representation of the individual trees will be incomplete. We explore how stand-level volume estimates, based on the single-scan mode, perform compared with standard inventory estimates. We base our study on 166 plots in 12 mature stands dominated by Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) in southern Norway. First, we compare individual-tree volume estimates from TLS with estimates from volume functions and measurements from harvesters. We show that individual-tree volumes can be estimated with high precision and accuracy with TLS in single-scan mode. Secondly, we test three approaches for correction of nondetection relying on model-based estimates of the detection probability obtained by point transect sampling estimators. We show that all three approaches adjust for nondetection and yield stand-level volume estimates that are similar to those obtained by fixed-area sampling. In conclusion, our results indicate that stand-level volume estimates, based on single-scan mode TLS data, perform well compared with standard inventory estimates.

This research tested how different scanner positions and sample plot sizes affect the tree detection and diameter measurement in forest inventories. For this, a multistage density-based clustering approach was further developed for the automatic mapping of tree positions and simultaneously applied with automatic measurements of tree diameters. This further development of the algorithm reduced the proportion of falsely detected tree locations by about 64%. The algorithms were tested in different settings with respect to the number and spatial alignment of scanner positions and under manifold forest conditions, covering different age classes and a mixture of scenarios, and representing a broad gradient of structural complexity. For circular sample plots with a maximum radius of 20 m, the tree mapping algorithm showed a detection rate of 82.4% with seven scanner positions at the vertices of a hexagon plus the center coordinates, and 68.3% with four scanner positions aligned in a triangle plus the center. Detection rates were significantly increased with smaller maximum radii. Thus, with a maximum radius of 10 m, the hexagon setting yielded a detection rate of 90.5% and the triangle 92%. Other alignments of scanner positions were also tested, but proved to be either unfavorable or too labor-intensive. The commission rates were on average less than 3%. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the dbh (diameter at breast height) measurement was between 2.66 cm and 4.18 cm for the hexagon and between 3.0 cm and 4.7 cm for the triangle design. The robustness of the algorithm was also demonstrated via tests by means of an international benchmark dataset. It has been shown that the number of stems per hectare had a significant impact on the detection rate.

Mapping of exact tree positions can be regarded as a crucial task of field work associated with forest monitoring, especially on intensive research plots. We propose a two-stage density clustering approach for the automatic mapping of tree positions, and an algorithm for automatic tree diameter estimates based on terrestrial laser-scanning (TLS) point cloud data sampled under limited sighting conditions. We show that our novel approach is able to detect tree positions in a mixed and vertically structured stand with an overall accuracy of 91.6%, and with omission- and commission error of only 5.7% and 2.7% respectively. Moreover, we were able to reproduce the stand’s diameter in breast height (DBH) distribution, and to estimate single trees DBH with a mean average deviation of ±2.90 cm compared with tape measurements as reference.

In forest inventory, trees are usually measured using handheld instruments; among the most relevant are calipers, inclinometers, ultrasonic devices, and laser range finders. Traditional forest inventory has been redesigned since modern laser scanner technology became available. Laser scanners generate massive data in the form of 3D point clouds. We have developed a novel methodology to provide estimates of the tree positions, stem diameters, and tree heights from these 3D point clouds. This dataset was made publicly accessible to test new software routines for the automatic measurement of forest trees using laser scanner data. Benchmark studies with performance tests of different algorithms are welcome. The dataset contains co-registered raw 3D point-cloud data collected on 20 forest inventory sample plots in Austria. The data were collected by two different laser scanning systems: (1) A mobile personal laser scanner (PLS) (ZEB Horizon, GeoSLAM Ltd., Nottingham, UK) and (2) a static terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) (Focus3D X330, Faro Technologies Inc., Lake Mary, FL, USA). The data also contain digital terrain models (DTMs), field measurements as reference data (ground-truth), and the output of recent software routines for the automatic tree detection and the automatic stem diameter measurement.