The estimation of single tree and complete stand information is one of the central tasks of forest inventory. In recent years, automatic algorithms have been successfully developed for the detection and measurement of trees with laser scanning technology. Nevertheless, most of the forest inventories are nowadays carried out with manual tree measurements using traditional instruments. This is due to the high investment costs for modern laser scanner equipment and, in particular, the time-consuming and incomplete nature of data acquisition with stationary terrestrial laser scanners. Traditionally, forest inventory data are collected through manual surveys with calipers or tapes. Practically, this is both labor and time-consuming. In 2020, Apple implemented a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor in the new Apple iPad Pro (4th Gen) and iPhone Pro 12. Since then, access to LiDAR-generated 3D point clouds has become possible with consumer-level devices. In this study, an Apple iPad Pro was tested to produce 3D point clouds, and its performance was compared with a personal laser scanning (PLS) approach to estimate individual tree parameters in different forest types and structures. Reference data were obtained by traditional measurements on 21 circular forest inventory sample plots with a 7 m radius. The tree mapping with the iPad showed a detection rate of 97.3% compared to 99.5% with the PLS scans for trees with a lower diameter at a breast height (dbh) threshold of 10 cm. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the best dbh measurement out of five different dbh modeling approaches was 3.13 cm with the iPad and 1.59 cm with PLS. The data acquisition time with the iPad was approximately 7.51 min per sample plot; this is twice as long as that with PLS but 2.5 times shorter than that with traditional forest inventory equipment. In conclusion, the proposed forest inventory with the iPad is generally feasible and achieves accurate and precise stem counts and dbh measurements with efficient labor effort compared to traditional approaches. Along with future technological developments, it is expected that other consumer-level handheld devices with integrated laser scanners will also be developed beyond the iPad, which will serve as an accurate and cost-efficient alternative solution to the approved but relatively expensive TLS and PLS systems. Such a development would be mandatory to broadly establish digital technology and fully automated routines in forest inventory practice. Finally, high-level progress is generally expected for the broader scientific community in forest ecosystem monitoring, as the collection of highly precise 3D point cloud data is no longer hindered by financial burdens.

Introduction: Cable yarding is a technology that enables efficient and sustainable use of timber resources in mountainous areas. Carriages as an integral component of cable yarding systems have undergone significant development in recent decades. In addition to mechanical and functional developments, carriages are increasingly used as carrier platforms for various sensors. The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of individual standing tree and stand variable estimates obtained by a mobile laser scanning system mounted on a cable yarder carriage.Methods: Eight cable corridors were scanned across two forest stands. Four different scan variants were conducted, differing in the movement speed of the carriage and the direction of movement during scanning. An algorithm for tree detection, diameter and height estimation was applied to the 3D datasets and evaluated against manual tree measurements.Results: The analysis of the 3D scans showed that the individual tree parameters strongly depend on the scan variant and the distance of each individual tree to the skyline. This was due to changing 3D point densities and occlusion effects. It turned out that scan variant 1, in which the scan was performed during slow carriage movement downwards and back upwards again, was advantageous. At a distance of 10 m, which is half of the recommended corridor spacing of 20 m for whole tree cable yarding, 95.44% of the trees in stand 1 and 92.16% of the trees in stand 2 could be detected automatically. The corresponding root mean sqare errors of the diameter at breast height estimatimations were 1.59 cm and 2.23 cm, respectively. The root mean square errors of the height measurements were 2.94 m and 4.63 m.Conclusions: The results of this study can help to further advance the digitization of cable yarding and timber flow from the standing tree to the sawmill. However, this requires further development steps in cable yarder, carriage, and laserscanner technology. Furthermore, there is also a need for more efficient software routines to take the next steps towards precision forestry.

The utilization of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data for forest inventory purposes has increasingly gained recognition in the past two decades. Volume estimates from TLS data are usually derived from the integral of cross-section area estimates along the stem axis. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of circle, ellipse, and spline fits applied to cross-section area modeling, and to evaluate the influence of different modeling parameters on the cross-section area estimation. For this purpose, 20 trees were scanned with FARO Focus^3D X330 and afterward felled to collect stem disks at different heights. The contours of the disks were digitized under in vitro laboratory conditions to provide reference data for the evaluation of the in situ TLS-based cross-section modeling. The results showed that the spline model fit achieved the most precise and accurate estimate of the cross-section area when compared to the reference cross-section area (RMSD (Root Mean Square Deviation) and bias of only 3.66% and 0.17%, respectively) and was able to exactly represent the shape of the stem disk (ratio between intersection and union of modeled and reference cross-section area of 88.69%). In comparison, contour fits with ellipses and circles yielded higher RMSD (5.28% and 10.08%, respectively) and bias (1.96% and 3.27%, respectively). The circle fit proved to be especially robust with respect to varying parameter settings, but provided exact estimates only for regular-shaped stem disks, such as those from the upper parts of the stem. Spline-based models of the cross-section at breast height were further used to examine the influence of caliper orientation on the volume estimation. Simulated caliper measures of the DBH showed an RMSD of 3.99% and a bias of 1.73% when compared to the reference DBH, which was calculated via the reference cross-section area, resulting in biased estimates of basal area and volume. DBH estimates obtained by simulated cross-calipering showed statistically significant deviations from the reference. The findings cast doubt on the customary utilization of manually calipered diameters as reference data when evaluating the accuracy of TLS data, as TLS-based estimates have reached an accuracy level surpassing traditional caliper measures.

The presence of sufficient natural regeneration in mature forests is regarded as a pivotal criterion for their future stability, ensuring seamless reforestation following final harvesting operations or forest calamities. Consequently, forest regeneration is typically quantified as part of forest inventories to monitor its occurrence and development over time. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology, particularly ground-based LiDAR, has emerged as a powerful tool for assessing typical forest inventory parameters, providing high-resolution, three-dimensional data on the forest structure. Therefore, it is logical to attempt a LiDAR-based quantification of forest regeneration, which could greatly enhance area-wide monitoring, further supporting sustainable forest management through data-driven decision making. However, examples in the literature are relatively sparse, with most relevant studies focusing on an indirect quantification of understory density from airborne LiDAR data (ALS). The objective of this study is to develop an accurate and reliable method for estimating regeneration coverage from data obtained through personal laser scanning (PLS). To this end, 19 forest inventory plots were scanned with both a personal and a high-resolution terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) for reference purposes. The voxelated point clouds obtained from the personal laser scanner were converted into raster images, providing either the canopy height, the total number of filled voxels (containing at least one LiDAR point), or the ratio of filled voxels to the total number of voxels. Local maxima in these raster images, assumed to be likely to contain tree saplings, were then used as seed points for a raster-based tree segmentation, which was employed to derive the final regeneration coverage estimate. The results showed that the estimates differed from the reference in a range of approximately −10 to +10 percentage points, with an average deviation of around 0 percentage points. In contrast, visually estimated regeneration coverages on the same forest plots deviated from the reference by between −20 and +30 percentage points, approximately −2 percentage points on average. These findings highlight the potential of PLS data for automated forest regeneration quantification, which could be further expanded to include a broader range of data collected during LiDAR-based forest inventory campaigns.