Enrico Fabris

Dr. Enrico Fabris

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 July 2021 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKElvin Kedhi
Elvin Kedhi
BBBalazs Berta
Balazs Berta
TRTomasz Roleder
Tomasz Roleder
RHRenicus S Hermanides
Renicus S Hermanides
EFEnrico Fabris
Enrico Fabris
WWWojciech Wojakowski
Wojciech Wojakowski
The aim of this study was to understand the impact of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) on clinical outcomes of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative lesions. COMBINE OCT-FFR study was a prospective, double-blind, international, natural history study. After FFR assessment, and revascularization of FFR-positive lesions, patients with ≥1 FFR-negative lesions (target lesions) were classified in two groups based on the presence or absence of ≥1 TCFA lesion. The primary endpoint compared FFR-negative TCFA-positive patients with FFR-negative TCFA-negative patients for a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization or unstable angina requiring hospitalization at 18 months. Among 550 patients enrolled, 390 (81%) patients had ≥1 FFR-negative lesions. Among FFR-negative patients, 98 (25%) were TCFA positive and 292 (75%) were TCFA negative. The incidence of the primary endpoint was 13.3% and 3.1% in TCFA-positive vs. TCFA-negative groups, respectively (hazard ratio 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.99–10.89; P < 0.001). The Cox regression multivariable analysis identified TCFA as the strongest predictor of major adverse clinical events (MACE) (hazard ratio 5.12; 95% confidence interval 2.12–12.34; P < 0.001). Among DM patients with ≥1 FFR-negative lesions, TCFA-positive patients represented 25% of this population and were associated with a five-fold higher rate of MACE despite the absence of ischaemia. This discrepancy between the impact of vulnerable plaque and ischaemia on future adverse events may represent a paradigm shift for coronary artery disease risk stratification in DM patients. Study design and main results.

10 October 2020 in Current Cardiology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRossana Bussani
Rossana Bussani
MCMatteo Castrichini
Matteo Castrichini
LRLuca Restivo
Luca Restivo
EFEnrico Fabris
Enrico Fabris
APAldostefano Porcari
Aldostefano Porcari
GSGianfranco Sinagra
Gianfranco Sinagra
Purpose of Review: Cardiac masses frequently present significant diagnostic and therapeutic clinical challenges and encompass a broad set of lesions that can be either neoplastic or non-neoplastic. We sought to provide an overview of cardiac tumors using a cardiac chamber prevalence approach and providing epidemiology, imaging, histopathology, diagnostic workup, treatment, and prognoses of cardiac tumors.Recent Findings: Cardiac tumors are rare but remain an important component of cardio-oncology practice. Over the past decade, the advances in imaging techniques have enabled a noninvasive diagnosis in many cases. Indeed, imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography are important tools for diagnosing and characterizing the lesions. Although an epidemiological and multimodality imaging approach is useful, the definite diagnosis requires histologic examination in challenging scenarios, and histopathological characterization remains the diagnostic gold standard.Summary: A comprehensive clinical and multimodality imaging evaluation of cardiac tumors is fundamental to obtain a proper differential diagnosis, but histopathology is necessary to reach the final diagnosis and subsequent clinical management.

12 August 2024 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRocco Antonio Montone
Rocco Antonio Montone
RRRiccardo Rinaldi
Riccardo Rinaldi
GNGiampaolo Niccoli
Giampaolo Niccoli
Giuseppe AndòGiuseppe Andò
Giuseppe Andò
Felice GragnanoFelice Gragnano
Felice Gragnano
FCFilippo Crea
Filippo Crea

1 January 2020 in Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAntonio Cannata
Antonio Cannata
EFEnrico Fabris
Enrico Fabris
MMMarco Merlo
Marco Merlo
JAJessica Artico
Jessica Artico
PGPiero Gentile
Piero Gentile
GSGianfranco Sinagra
Gianfranco Sinagra

1 September 2021 in Atherosclerosis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Leonardo De LucaLeonardo De Luca
Leonardo De Luca
NDNiels Debel
Niels Debel
MCMiha Cercek
Miha Cercek
LJLisette Okkels Jensen
Lisette Okkels Jensen
MVMarija Vavlukis
Marija Vavlukis
MVMonica Verdoia
Monica Verdoia

27 October 2021 in Heart
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Leonardo De LucaLeonardo De Luca
Leonardo De Luca
Magdy AlgowharyMagdy Algowhary
Magdy Algowhary
BUBerat Uguz
Berat Uguz
DODinaldo C Oliveira
Dinaldo C Oliveira
VGVladimir Ganyukov
Vladimir Ganyukov
MVMonica Verdoia
Monica Verdoia
Objective The initial data of the International Study on Acute Coronary Syndromes - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction COVID-19 showed in Europe a remarkable reduction in primary percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and higher in-hospital mortality during the initial phase of the pandemic as compared with the prepandemic period. The aim of the current study was to provide the final results of the registry, subsequently extended outside Europe with a larger inclusion period (up to June 2020) and longer follow-up (up to 30 days). Methods This is a retrospective multicentre registry in 109 high-volume primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centres from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia and North Africa, enrolling 16 674 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPPCI in March/June 2019 and 2020. The main study outcomes were the incidence of PPCI, delayed treatment (ischaemia time >12 hours and door-to-balloon >30 min), in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Results In 2020, during the pandemic, there was a significant reduction in PPCI as compared with 2019 (incidence rate ratio 0.843, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.861, p75 years) (p=0.015), and was not related to the peak of cases or deaths due to COVID-19. The heterogeneity among centres was high (p<0.001). Furthermore, the pandemic was associated with a significant increase in door-to-balloon time (40 (25–70) min vs 40 (25–64) min, p=0.01) and total ischaemia time (225 (135–410) min vs 196 (120–355) min, p<0.001), which may have contributed to the higher in-hospital (6.5% vs 5.3%, p<0.001) and 30-day (8% vs 6.5%, p=0.001) mortality observed during the pandemic. Conclusion Percutaneous revascularisation for STEMI was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 16% reduction in PPCI procedures, especially among older patients (about 20%), and longer delays to treatment, which may have contributed to the increased in-hospital and 30-day mortality during the pandemic. Trial registration number NCT04412655.