In this study, we evaluated the performance of GeoSLAM ZEB Horizon and Stonex X120GO SLAM handheld mobile laser scanners (HMLS) to address two primary objectives. First, we aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of positioning achieved using HMLS instruments. Second, we sought to investigate the influencing factors and their impact on estimation accuracies. The factors influencing the accuracy of positioning in HMLS Simultaneous Localization and Mapping-aided solutions were defined, considering the scanner type, distance from the trajectory, forest structure, tree species, and Diameter at Breast Height. The same type of trajectory was tested in five different stand structures. The evaluation of GeoSLAM HMLS point clouds yielded an average positional RMSE of 17.91 cm, while the data extracted from the Stonex HMLS resulted in an average positional RMSE of 17.33 cm. These results underscore the significant potential of HMLS technology in addressing the critical need for precise positioning data in various applications, from forestry management to environmental monitoring, wildlife habitat assessment, and climate change studies. By harnessing the power of handheld mobile laser scanners, our research aims to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of geospatial data capture in challenging.

Circle-fitting methods are commonly used to estimate diameter at breast height (DBH) of trees from horizontal cross-section of point clouds. In this paper, we addressed the problem of cross-section thickness optimization regarding DBH estimation bias and accuracy. DBH of 121 European beeches (Fagus sylvatica L.) and 43 Sessile oaks (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) was estimated from cross-sections with thicknesses ranging from 1 to 100 cm. The impact of cross-section thickness on the bias, standard error, and accuracy of DBH estimation was statistically significant. However, the biases, standard errors, and accuracies of DBH estimation were not significantly different among 1–10-cm cross-sections, except for oak DBH estimation accuracy from an 8-cm cross-section. DBH estimations from 10–100-cm cross-sections were considerably different. These results provide insight to the influence of cross-section thickness on DBH estimation by circle-fitting methods, which is beneficial for point cloud data acquisition planning and processing. The optimal setting of cross-section thickness facilitates point cloud processing and DBH estimation by circle-fitting algorithms.

During the summer of 2022, heat waves exacerbated drought conditions across Europe, significantly deteriorating Slovakia’s forest health (FH). The main symptoms were defoliation and discolouration (mainly browning). According to the literature, completely brown leaves/needles are considered defoliation, and premature yellowing halts assimilation and reduces production. Thus, evaluating FH based solely on defoliation may underestimate the impact severity. To address this issue, we proposed a formula that integrates both defoliation and discolouration metrics. Then, by linking terrestrial and satellite data (a mosaic from Sentinel-2 and Landsat 9), regression models were developed using two-phase sampling to estimate defoliation, discolouration, and their combination. In the first phase, the Gram–Schmidt transformation of four satellite mosaic bands was used to derive two orthogonal components: one optimized for FH estimation (NSC2) and one for eliminating the influence of species composition on FH classification (NSC1). In the second phase, ground data were collected for the construction of a regression and to improve the first-phase results. The NSC2 component showed a strong correlation with defoliation, discolouration, and their combination. The standard error of the estimate was ±9.7% and the R² was 0.83 for the combined symptoms, which enabled a detailed assessment of the intensity of forest damage. Our method is independent of tree species and has potential in FH assessments of temperate forests in Europe.

Our work aimed to compare the chip pile volumes calculated by laser ground scanning, UAV technology, and laser ground measurement and also to determine the accuracy, speed, and economic efficiency of each method. The large chip pile was measured in seven different ways: band measurement, laser measurement with Vertex, global navigation satellite system, handheld mobile laser scanner, terrestrial laser scanner, drone, and smartphone with a light detection and ranging sensor. All the methods were compared in terms of accuracy, price, user-friendliness, and time required to obtain results. The calculated pile volume, depending on the method, varied from 2588 to 3362 m³. The most accurate results were provided by the terrestrial laser scanning method, which, however, was the most expensive and the most demanding in terms of collecting and evaluating the results. From a time and economic point of view, the most effective methods were UAVs and smartphones with LiDAR.

Forestry is essential for environmental sustainability, biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, and renewable resource management. Traditional methods for forest inventory, particularly the manual measurement of diameter at breast height (DBH), are labor-intensive and prone to error. Recent advancements in proximal sensing, including lidar and photogrammetry, have paved the way for more efficient approaches, yet high costs remain a barrier to widespread adoption. This study investigates the potential of close-range photogrammetry (CRP) using low-cost devices, such as smartphones, cameras, and specialized handheld laser scanners (Stonex and LIVOX prototype), to generate 3D point clouds for accurate DBH estimation. We compared these devices by assessing their agreement and efficiency when compared to conventional methods in diverse forest conditions across multiple tree species. Additionally, we analyze factors influencing measurement errors and propose a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide technology selection in forest inventory. The results show that the lowest-cost devices and photogrammetric methods achieved the highest agreement with the conventional (caliper-based) measurements, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate. Photogrammetry provided the most accurate DBH estimates (error ≈ 0.7 cm) but required the highest effort; handheld laser scanners achieved an average accuracy of about 1.5 cm at substantially higher cost, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate (3–3.5 cm error). The outcomes of this research aim to facilitate more accessible, reliable, and sustainable forest management practices.

Aerial laser scanning technology has excellent potential in landscape management and forestry. Due to its specific characteristics, the application of this type of data is the subject of intensive research, with the search for new areas of application. This work aims to identify the boundaries of forest stands, and forest patches on non-forest land. The research objectives cover the diversity of conditions in the forest landscapes of Slovakia, with its high variability of tree species composition (coniferous, mixed, deciduous stands), age, height, and stand density. A semi-automatic procedure was designed and verified (consisting of the creation of a digital terrain model, a digital surface model, and the identification of peaks and contours of tree crowns), which allows after identification of homogeneous areas of forest stands and/or forest patches (areas covered with trees species canopy) with selected parameters (height, crown size, gap size), with high accuracy. The applicability of the proposed procedure increases the use of freely available ALS data (provided by the Office of Geodesy, Cartography, and Cadastre of the Slovak Republic) and freely distributable software tools (QGIS, CloudCompare).