Georgios Xanthopoulos

Prof. Georgios Xanthopoulos

Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Attikí, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 June 2018 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evangelos AnastasiouEvangelos Anastasiou
Evangelos Anastasiou
Athanasios BalafoutisAthanasios Balafoutis
Athanasios Balafoutis
NDNicoleta Darra
Nicoleta Darra
VPVasilis Psiroukis
Vasilis Psiroukis
KBKaterina Biniari
Katerina Biniari
Spyros FountasSpyros Fountas
Spyros Fountas
Table grapes are a crop with high nutritional value that need to be monitored often to achieve high yield and quality. Non-destructive methods, such as satellite and proximal sensing, are widely used to estimate crop yield and quality characteristics, and spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) are commonly used to present site specific information. The aim of this study was the assessment of SVIs derived from satellite and proximal sensing at different growth stages of table grapes from veraison to harvest. The study took place in a commercial table grape vineyard (Vitis vinifera cv. Thompson Seedless) during three successive cultivation years (2015–2017). The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI) were calculated by employing satellite imagery (Landsat 8) and proximal sensing (Crop Circle ACS 470) to assess the yield and quality characteristics of table grapes. The SVIs exhibited different degrees of correlations with different measurement dates and sensing methods. Satellite-based GNDVI at harvest presented higher correlations with crop quality characteristics (r = 0.522 for berry diameter, r = 0.537 for pH, r = 0.629 for berry deformation) compared with NDVI. Proximal-based GNDVI at the middle of veraison presented higher correlations compared with NDVI (r = −0.682 for berry diameter, r = −0.565 for berry deformation). Proximal sensing proved to be more accurate in terms of table grape yield and quality characteristics compared to satellite sensing.

3 August 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nikos TsouliasNikos Tsoulias
Nikos Tsoulias
Dimitrios S. ParaforosDimitrios S. Paraforos
Dimitrios S. Paraforos
Georgios XanthopoulosGeorgios Xanthopoulos
Georgios Xanthopoulos
Manuela Zude-SasseManuela Zude-Sasse
Manuela Zude-Sasse
Yield monitoring systems in fruit production mostly rely on color features, making the discrimination of fruits challenging due to varying light conditions. The implementation of geometric and radiometric features in three-dimensional space (3D) analysis can alleviate such difficulties improving the fruit detection. In this study, a light detection and range (LiDAR) system was used to scan apple trees before (TL) and after defoliation (TD) four times during seasonal tree growth. An apple detection method based on calibrated apparent backscattered reflectance intensity (RToF) and geometric features, capturing linearity (L) and curvature (C) derived from the LiDAR 3D point cloud, is proposed. The iterative discretion of apple class from leaves and woody parts was obtained at RToF > 76.1%, L < 15.5%, and C > 73.2%. The position of fruit centers in TL and in TD was compared, showing a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.7%. The diameter of apples estimated from the foliated trees was related to the reference values based on the perimeter of the fruits, revealing an adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj) of 0.95 and RMSE of 9.5% at DAFB120. When comparing the results obtained on foliated and defoliated tree’s data, the estimated number of fruit’s on foliated trees at DAFB42, DAFB70, DAFB104, and DAFB120 88.6%, 85.4%, 88.5%, and 94.8% of the ground truth values, respectively. The algorithm resulted in maximum values of 88.2% precision, 91.0% recall, and 89.5 F1 score at DAFB120. The results point to the high capacity of LiDAR variables [RToF, C, L] to localize fruit and estimate its size by means of remote sensing.

1 July 2012 in Journal of Food Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Georgios XanthopoulosGeorgios Xanthopoulos
Georgios Xanthopoulos
EKE.D. Koronaki
E.D. Koronaki
Andreas BoudouvisAndreas Boudouvis
Andreas Boudouvis

1 June 2017 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Georgios XanthopoulosGeorgios Xanthopoulos
Georgios Xanthopoulos
CTCharalampos G. Templalexis
Charalampos G. Templalexis
NANikolaos P. Aleiferis
Nikolaos P. Aleiferis
DLDiamanto I. Lentzou
Diamanto I. Lentzou

1 August 2007 in Journal of Food Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Georgios XanthopoulosGeorgios Xanthopoulos
Georgios Xanthopoulos
NON. Oikonomou
N. Oikonomou
GLG. Lambrinos
G. Lambrinos

1 August 2010 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMH. Manolopoulou
H. Manolopoulou
Georgios XanthopoulosGeorgios Xanthopoulos
Georgios Xanthopoulos
NDN. Douros
N. Douros
GLGr. Lambrinos
Gr. Lambrinos