Fabio Maglitto

Dr. Fabio Maglitto

Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II” , 80138 Napoli, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FIFranco Ionna
Franco Ionna
PBPaolo Bossi
Paolo Bossi
Agostino GuidaAgostino Guida
Agostino Guida
Andrea AlbertiAndrea Alberti
Andrea Alberti
PMPaolo Muto
Paolo Muto
FPFrancesco Perri
Francesco Perri
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a complex group of malignancies, posing several challenges to treating physicians. Most patients are diagnosed with a locally advanced disease and treated with strategies integrating surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. About 50% of these patients will experience a recurrence of disease. Recurrent/metastatic SCCHN have poor prognosis with a median survival of about 12 months despite treatments. In the last years, the strategy to manage recurrent/metastatic SCCHN has profoundly evolved. Salvage treatments (surgery or re-irradiation) are commonly employed in patients suffering from locoregional recurrences and their role has gained more and more importance in the last years. Re-irradiation, using some particularly fractionating schedules, has the dual task of reducing the tumor mass and eliciting an immune response against cancer (abscopal effect). In this review, we will analyze the main systemic and/or locoregional strategies aimed at facing the recurrent/metastatic disease, underlining the enormous importance of the multidisciplinary approach in these types of patients.

1 December 2019 in British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPaola Bonavolontà
Paola Bonavolontà
GOGiovanni Dell'AVersana Orabona
Giovanni Dell'AVersana Orabona
Fabio MaglittoFabio Maglitto
Fabio Maglitto
VAVincenzo Abbate
Vincenzo Abbate
UCUmberto Committeri
Umberto Committeri
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano

19 January 2022 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luigi Angelo VairaLuigi Angelo Vaira
Luigi Angelo Vaira
CGClaudia Gessa
Claudia Gessa
Giovanna DeianaGiovanna Deiana
Giovanna Deiana
Giovanni SalzanoGiovanni Salzano
Giovanni Salzano
Fabio MaglittoFabio Maglitto
Fabio Maglitto
GRGiacomo De Riu
Giacomo De Riu
(1) Background: Persistent olfactory (POD) and gustatory (PGD) dysfunctions are one of the most frequent symptoms of long-Coronavirus Disease 2019 but their effect on the quality of life (QoL) of patients is still largely unexplored. (2) Methods: An online survey was administered to individuals who reported to have had SARS-CoV-2 infection at least 6 months prior with persisting COVID-19 symptoms (using the COVID symptom index), including ratings of POD and PGD, and their physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) components of quality of life were assessed using the standardized short form 12 questionnaire (SF-12). (3) Results: Responses from 431 unique individuals were included in the analyses. The most frequent persistent symptoms were: fatigue (185 cases, 42.9%), olfactory dysfunction (127 cases, 29.5%), gustatory dysfunction (96 cases, 22.3%) and muscle pain (83 cases, 19.3%). Respondents who reported persisting muscle pain, joint pain, fatigue, headache, gastrointestinal disturbances, and dyspnea had significantly worse PCS. Those experiencing persistent fatigue and dyspnea also showed significantly lower MCS. Respondents reporting POD or PGD showed significantly worse QoL, but only pertaining to the MCS. Multiple regressions predicted MCS based on olfactory and marginally on gustatory ratings, but not PCS. Age significantly affected the prediction of PCS but not MCS, and gender and temporal distance from the COVID-19 diagnosis had no effect. (4) Conclusions: POD and PGD are frequent symptoms of the long-COVID-19 syndrome and significantly reduce QoL, specifically in the mental health component. This evidence should stimulate the establishment of appropriate infrastructure to support individuals with persistent CD, while research on effective therapies scales up.

1 June 2018 in Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GOGiovanni Dell’aVersana Orabona
Giovanni Dell’aVersana Orabona
VAVincenzo Abbate
Vincenzo Abbate
Fabio MaglittoFabio Maglitto
Fabio Maglitto
PBPaola Bonavolontà
Paola Bonavolontà
Giovanni SalzanoGiovanni Salzano
Giovanni Salzano
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano

28 October 2024 in Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Luigi Angelo VairaLuigi Angelo Vaira
Luigi Angelo Vaira
Jerome R. LechienJerome R. Lechien
Jerome R. Lechien
Antonino ManiaciAntonino Maniaci
Antonino Maniaci
GTGiuseppe Tanda
Giuseppe Tanda
VAVincenzo Abbate
Vincenzo Abbate
GRGiacomo De Riu
Giacomo De Riu
This study evaluates the quality and readability of informed consent documents generated by AI platforms ChatGPT-4 and Bard Gemini Advanced compared to those written by a first-year oral surgery resident for common oral surgery procedures. The evaluation, conducted by 18 experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons, assessed consents for accuracy, completeness, readability, and overall quality. ChatGPT-4 consistently outperformed both Bard and human-written consents. ChatGPT-4 consents had a median accuracy score of 4 [IQR 4-4], compared to Bard's 3 [IQR 3-4] and human's 4 [IQR 3-4]. Completeness scores were higher for ChatGPT-4 (4 [IQR 4-5]) than Bard (3 [IQR 3-4]) and human (4 [IQR 3-4]). Readability was also superior for ChatGPT-4, with a median score of 4 [IQR 4-5] compared to Bard and human consents, both at 4 [IQR 4-4] and 4 [IQR 3-4], respectively. The Gunning Fog Index for ChatGPT-4 was 17.2 [IQR 16.5-18.2], better than Bard's 23.1 [IQR 20.5-24.7] and the human consents' 20 [IQR 19.2-20.9]. Overall, ChatGPT-4's consents received the highest quality ratings, underscoring AI's potential in enhancing patient communication and the informed consent process. The study suggests AI can reduce misinformation risks and improve patient understanding, but continuous evaluation, oversight, and patient feedback integration are crucial to ensure the effectiveness and appropriateness of AI-generated content in clinical practice.

1 April 2021 in Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGiovanni Salzano
Giovanni Salzano
Fabio MaglittoFabio Maglitto
Fabio Maglitto
ABAntonella Bisogno
Antonella Bisogno
Luigi Angelo VairaLuigi Angelo Vaira
Luigi Angelo Vaira
GRGiacomo De Riu
Giacomo De Riu
FSFrancesco Antonio Salzano
Francesco Antonio Salzano
Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) is a disease characterised by upper airway obstruction during sleep, quite frequent in the general population, even if underestimated. Snoring, sleep apnoea and diurnal hypersomnia are common in these patients. Central obesity plays a key role: it reduces the size and changes the conformation of the upper airways, besides preventing lung expansion, with consequent reduction of lung volumes. Furthermore, obese people are also resistant to leptin, which physiologically stimulates ventilation; as a result, this causes scarce awakening during apnoea. OSAHS diagnosis is based on the combination of clinical parameters, such as apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI), medical history, physical examination and Mallampati score. The first objective reference method to identify OSAHS is polysomnography followed by sleep endoscopy. Therapy provides in the first instance reduction of body weight, followed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which still remains the treatment of choice in most patients, mandibular advancement devices (MAD) and finally otolaryngology or maxillofacial surgery. Among surgical techniques, central is barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP), used in the field of multilevel surgery.