Paolo Muto

Dr. Paolo Muto

Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italia
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2014 in OncoImmunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AGAntonio M Grimaldi
Antonio M Grimaldi
ESEster Simeone
Ester Simeone
DGDiana Giannarelli
Diana Giannarelli
PMPaolo Muto
Paolo Muto
SFSara Falivene
Sara Falivene
PAPaolo A Ascierto
Paolo A Ascierto
Cancer radiotherapy (RT) may induce what is referred to as the “abscopal effect,” a regression of non-irradiated metastatic lesions distant from the primary tumor site directly subject to irradiati...

14 May 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FIFranco Ionna
Franco Ionna
PBPaolo Bossi
Paolo Bossi
Agostino GuidaAgostino Guida
Agostino Guida
Andrea AlbertiAndrea Alberti
Andrea Alberti
PMPaolo Muto
Paolo Muto
FPFrancesco Perri
Francesco Perri
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a complex group of malignancies, posing several challenges to treating physicians. Most patients are diagnosed with a locally advanced disease and treated with strategies integrating surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. About 50% of these patients will experience a recurrence of disease. Recurrent/metastatic SCCHN have poor prognosis with a median survival of about 12 months despite treatments. In the last years, the strategy to manage recurrent/metastatic SCCHN has profoundly evolved. Salvage treatments (surgery or re-irradiation) are commonly employed in patients suffering from locoregional recurrences and their role has gained more and more importance in the last years. Re-irradiation, using some particularly fractionating schedules, has the dual task of reducing the tumor mass and eliciting an immune response against cancer (abscopal effect). In this review, we will analyze the main systemic and/or locoregional strategies aimed at facing the recurrent/metastatic disease, underlining the enormous importance of the multidisciplinary approach in these types of patients.

4 September 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GEGiovanna Esposito
Giovanna Esposito
GPGiuliano Palumbo
Giuliano Palumbo
Guido CarillioGuido Carillio
Guido Carillio
AMAnna Manzo
Anna Manzo
AMAgnese Montanino
Agnese Montanino
Alessandro MorabitoAlessandro Morabito
Alessandro Morabito
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor type with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Chemotherapy regimens containing platinum represent the cornerstone of treatment for patients with extensive disease, but there has been no real progress for 30 years. The evidence that SCLC is characterized by a high mutational burden led to the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. Randomized phase III trials demonstrated that the combination of atezolizumab (IMpower-133) or durvalumab (CASPIAN) with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy improved overall survival of patients with extensive disease. Instead, the KEYNOTE-604 study demonstrated that the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy failed to significantly improve overall survival, but it prolonged progression-free survival. The safety profile of these combinations was similar with the known safety profiles of all single agents and no new adverse events were observed. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab single agents showed anti-tumor activity and acceptable safety profile in Checkmate 032 and KEYNOTE 028/158 trials, respectively, in patients with SCLC after platinum-based therapy and at least one prior line of therapy. Future challenges are the identification predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in SCLC and the definition of the role of immunotherapy in patients with limited stage SCLC, in combination with radiotherapy or with other biological agents.

1 August 2010 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSilvia Scoccianti
Silvia Scoccianti
SMStefano Magrini
Stefano Magrini
URUmberto Ricardi
Umberto Ricardi
BDBeatrice Detti
Beatrice Detti
MBMichela Buglione
Michela Buglione
GBGiampaolo Biti
Giampaolo Biti
OBJECTIVE. To investigate the pattern of care and outcomes for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in Italy and compare our results with the previous Italian

1 September 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPriscilla Cascetta
Priscilla Cascetta
VSVincenzo Sforza
Vincenzo Sforza
AMAnna Manzo
Anna Manzo
Guido CarillioGuido Carillio
Guido Carillio
GPGiuliano Palumbo
Giuliano Palumbo
Alessandro MorabitoAlessandro Morabito
Alessandro Morabito
RET rearrangements are observed in 1–2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and result in the constitutive activation of downstream pathways normally implied in cell proliferation, growth, differentiation and survival. In NSCLC patients, RET rearrangements have been associated with a history of non-smoking, a higher rate of brain metastasis at initial diagnosis and a low immune infiltrate. Traditionally, RET fusions are considered mutually exclusive with other oncogenic drivers, even though a co-occurrence with EGFR mutations and MET amplifications has been observed. Cabozantinib, vandetanib and lenvatinib are the first multi-kinase inhibitors tested in RET-rearranged NSCLC patients with contrasting results. More recently, two selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, demonstrated higher efficacy rates and good tolerability and they were approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC on the bases of the results of phase II studies. Two ongoing phase III clinical trials are currently comparing selpercatinib or pralsetinib to standard first line treatments and will definitively establish their efficacy in RET-positive NSCLC patients.

25 November 2016 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFrancesco Caponigro
Francesco Caponigro
EGElena Di Gennaro
Elena Di Gennaro
FIFranco Ionna
Franco Ionna
Francesco LongoFrancesco Longo
Francesco Longo
CACorrado Aversa
Corrado Aversa
Alfredo BudillonAlfredo Budillon
Alfredo Budillon
Recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has a poor prognosis and the combination of cisplatin and cetuximab, with or without 5-fluorouracil, is the gold standard treatment in this stage. Thus, the concomitant use of novel compounds represents a critical strategy to improve treatment results. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) enhance the activity of several anticancer drugs including cisplatin and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (anti-EGFR) compounds. Preclinical studies in models have shown that vorinostat is able to down regulate Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) expression and to revert epithelial to mesenchimal transition (EMT). Due to its histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibiting activity and its safe use as a chronic therapy for epileptic disorders, valproic acid (VPA) has been considered a good candidate for anticancer therapy. A reasonable option may be to employ the combination of cisplatin, cetuximab and VPA in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN taking advantage of the possible positive interaction between histone deacetylase inhibitors, cisplatin and/or anti-EGFR. V-CHANCE is a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating, in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck never treated with first-line chemotherapy, the concomitant standard administration of cisplatin (on day 1, every 3 weeks) and cetuximab (on day 1, weekly), in combination with oral VPA given daily from day −14 with a titration strategy in each patient (target serum level of 50–100 μg/ml). Primary end point is the objective response rate measured according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Sample size, calculated according to Simon 2 stage minimax design will include 21 patients in the first stage with upper limit for rejection being 8 responses, and 39 patients in the second stage, with upper limit for rejection being 18 responses. Secondary endpoints are time to progression, duration of response, overall survival, safety. Objectives of the translational study are the evaluation on tumor samples of markers of treatment efficacy/resistance (i.e. γH2AX, p21/WAF, RAD51, XRCC1, EGFR, p-EGFR, Ki-67) and specific markers of VPA HDAC inhibitory activity (histones and proteins acetylation, Histone deacetylase isoforms) as well as valproate test, histones and proteins acetylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell, tested on blood samples at baseline and at different time points during treatment. Overall, this study could provide a less toxic and more effective first-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by demonstrating the feasibility and efficacy of cisplatin/cetuximab plus valproic acid. Moreover, correlative studies could help to identify responder patients, and will add insights in the mechanism of the synergistic interaction between these agents. 2014-001523-69 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02624128