SUMMARY: The prevalence of anti-HEV isotype-specific antibodies and viraemia were investigated in serum samples collected from slaughter-age pigs (aged 22–24 weeks) from 23 farms in Scotland. Of 176 serum samples tested, 29·0% (n = 51) were anti-HEV IgG positive, 36·9% (n = 65) anti-HEV IgA positive and 29·0% (n = 51) anti-HEV IgM positive. Overall seroprevalence (anti-HEV IgG+ and/or IgA+ and/or IgM+) was 61·4% (n = 108). HEV RNA was detected in 72/162 serum samples (44·4%). Partial sequence of ORF2 (98 nt) was obtained from eight HEV RNA-positive samples and phylogenetic analysis confirmed that they were all of genotype 3. This is the first report on the prevalence of HEV in pigs in Scotland. Given the increasing incidence of locally acquired HEV infection in the UK, evidence that HEV is a foodborne zoonosis emphasizes the need for surveillance in pigs.
The emergence of leukemia following gene transfer to restore common cytokine receptor γ chain (γC) function in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1) has raised important questions with respect to gene therapy safety. To explore the risk factors involved, we tested the oncogenic potential of human γC in new strains of transgenic mice expressing the gene under the control of the CD2 promoter and locus control region (LCR). These mice demonstrated mildly perturbed T-cell development, with an increased proportion of thymic CD8 cells, but showed no predisposition to tumor development even on highly tumor prone backgrounds or after γ-retrovirus infection. The human CD2-γC transgene rescued T and B-cell development in γC−/− mice but with an age-related delay, mimicking postnatal reconstitution in SCID-X1 gene therapy subjects. However, we noted that γC−/− mice are acutely susceptible to murine leukemia virus (MLV) leukemogenesis, and that this trait was not corrected by the γC transgene. We conclude that the SCID-X1 phenotype can be corrected safely by stable ectopic expression of γC and that the transgene is not significantly oncogenic when expressed in this context. However, an underlying predisposition conferred by the SCID-X1 background appears to collaborate with insertional mutagenesis to increase the risk of tumor development.
Clinical xenotransplantation has the potential to address shortages of human organs for patients with end-stage organ failure. Advances in genetic engineering, immunosuppressive regimens, and infectious disease diagnostics have improved prospects for clinical xenotransplantation. Management of the infectious risks posed by clinical xenotransplantation requires biosecure breeding and validated methods for microbiological surveillance of source animals and recipients. Novel infection control protocols may complement biosafety requirements. Infectious risks in xenotransplantation include both known human pathogens common to immunosuppressed organ recipients and from porcine organisms or xenozoonoses for which the clinical manifestations are less well defined and for which microbial assays and therapies are more limited. Some pig-specific organisms do not infect human cells but have systemic manifestations when active within the xenograft. The human risk posed by porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) is uncertain. There are no documented transmissions of PERV in humans and swine are available with inactivated genomic PERV loci. Metagenomic sequencing will complement more traditional diagnostic tools in the detection of any unknown pathogens in xenotransplantation recipients. Such data are required for the development of protocols for donor and recipient microbiological surveillance, infection control, and antimicrobial therapies that will enhance the safety of clinical xenotransplantation.