LIDIA DEL PICCOLO

Prof. LIDIA DEL PICCOLO

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2011 in Patient Education and Counseling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPLIDIA DEL PICCOLO
LIDIA DEL PICCOLO
HHHanneke de Haes
Hanneke de Haes
CHCathy Heaven
Cathy Heaven
JJJesse Jansen
Jesse Jansen
WVWilliam Verheul
William Verheul
AFArnstein Finset
Arnstein Finset

21 July 2023 in eClinicalMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EGElisa Gentilotti
Elisa Gentilotti
AGAnna Gorska
Anna Gorska
ATAdriana Tami
Adriana Tami
RGRoy Gusinow
Roy Gusinow
MMMassimo Mirandola
Massimo Mirandola
ETEvelina Tacconelli
Evelina Tacconelli
Lack of specific definitions of clinical characteristics, disease severity, and risk and preventive factors of post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) severely impacts research and discovery of new preventive and therapeutics drugs. This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted from February 2020 to June 2022 in 5 countries, enrolling SARS-CoV-2 out- and in-patients followed at 3-, 6-, and 12-month from diagnosis, with assessment of clinical and biochemical features, antibody (Ab) response, Variant of Concern (VoC), and physical and mental quality of life (QoL). Outcome of interest was identification of risk and protective factors of PCS by clinical phenotype, setting, severity of disease, treatment, and vaccination status. We used SF-36 questionnaire to assess evolution in QoL index during follow-up and unsupervised machine learning algorithms (principal component analysis, PCA) to explore symptom clusters. Severity of PCS was defined by clinical phenotype and QoL. We also used generalized linear models to analyse the impact of PCS on QoL and associated risk and preventive factors. CT registration number: NCT05097677. Among 1796 patients enrolled, 1030 (57%) suffered from at least one symptom at 12-month. PCA identified 4 clinical phenotypes: chronic fatigue-like syndrome (CFs: fatigue, headache and memory loss, 757 patients, 42%), respiratory syndrome (REs: cough and dyspnoea, 502, 23%); chronic pain syndrome (CPs: arthralgia and myalgia, 399, 22%); and neurosensorial syndrome (NSs: alteration in taste and smell, 197, 11%). Determinants of clinical phenotypes were different (all comparisons p < 0.05): being female increased risk of CPs, NSs, and CFs; chronic pulmonary diseases of REs; neurological symptoms at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis of REs, NSs, and CFs; oxygen therapy of CFs and REs; and gastrointestinal symptoms at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis of CFs. Early treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection with monoclonal Ab (all clinical phenotypes), corticosteroids therapy for mild/severe cases (NSs), and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (CPs) were less likely to be associated to PCS (all comparisons p < 0.05). Highest reduction in QoL was detected in REs and CPs (43.57 and 43.86 vs 57.32 in PCS-negative controls, p < 0.001). Female sex (p < 0.001), gastrointestinal symptoms (p = 0.034) and renal complications (p = 0.002) during the acute infection were likely to increase risk of severe PCS (QoL <50). Vaccination and early treatment with monoclonal Ab reduced the risk of severe PCS (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). Our study provides new evidence suggesting that PCS can be classified by clinical phenotypes with different impact on QoL, underlying possible different pathogenic mechanisms. We identified factors associated to each clinical phenotype and to severe PCS. These results might help in designing pathogenesis studies and in selecting high-risk patients for inclusion in therapeutic and management clinical trials. The study received funding from the Horizon 2020 ORCHESTRA project, grant 101016167; from the 10.13039/501100001826 Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), grant 10430012010023; from 10.13039/501100001677 Inserm , REACTing (REsearch & ACtion emergING infectious diseases) consortium and the French Ministry of Health, grant PHRC 20-0424.

1 December 2017 in Patient Education and Counseling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPLIDIA DEL PICCOLO
LIDIA DEL PICCOLO
AFArnstein Finset
Arnstein Finset
AMAnneli V. Mellblom
Anneli V. Mellblom
MFMargarida Figueiredo-Braga
Margarida Figueiredo-Braga
LKLive Korsvold
Live Korsvold
GHGerald Humphris
Gerald Humphris

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFStefania Fochi
Stefania Fochi
GGGaia Giuriato
Gaia Giuriato
TSTonia De Simone
Tonia De Simone
MGMacarena Gomez-Lira
Macarena Gomez-Lira
Stefano TamburinStefano Tamburin
Stefano Tamburin
Maria RomanelliMaria Romanelli
Maria Romanelli
Sarcopenia refers to a condition of progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and function associated with a higher risk of falls and fractures in older adults. Musculoskeletal aging leads to reduced muscle mass and strength, affecting the quality of life in elderly people. In recent years, several studies contributed to improve the knowledge of the pathophysiological alterations that lead to skeletal muscle dysfunction; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying sarcopenia are still not fully understood. Muscle development and homeostasis require a fine gene expression modulation by mechanisms in which microRNAs (miRNAs) play a crucial role. miRNAs modulate key steps of skeletal myogenesis including satellite cells renewal, skeletal muscle plasticity, and regeneration. Here, we provide an overview of the general aspects of muscle regeneration and miRNAs role in skeletal mass homeostasis and plasticity with a special interest in their expression in sarcopenia and skeletal muscle adaptation to exercise in the elderly.

Marialuisa GandolfiMarialuisa Gandolfi
Marialuisa Gandolfi
Valeria DonisiValeria Donisi
Valeria Donisi
SBSimone Battista
Simone Battista
Alessandro PicelliAlessandro Picelli
Alessandro Picelli
Nicola ValèNicola Valè
Nicola Valè
Nicola SmaniaNicola Smania
Nicola Smania
This study aims at exploring disability, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), psychological distress, and psychological features in post-stroke patients with chronic pain. An observational cross-sectional study involving 50 post-stroke patients (25 with chronic pain and 25 without pain) was conducted. The primary outcome was the self-reported level of disability and HrQoL which were both assessed through the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. Both psychological distress and specific psychological features (i.e., self-efficacy, coping strategies, psychological flexibility, perceived social support) were examined. Post-stroke patients with chronic pain reported statistically significant higher levels of disability and worse HrQoL, higher psychological distress and inflexibility, as well as a lower level of self-efficacy and problem-oriented coping strategies than patients without pain (p < 0.001). Finally, correlation analysis in the group of stroke survivors with pain showed that higher levels of disability were significantly related to higher psychological distress. This study confirms the negative influence of chronic pain on disability and HrQoL in post-stroke patients and presents preliminary insights on the association between chronic pain, disability, HrQoL, psychosocial distress, and the patient’s approach in dealing with personal difficulties and emotions. These findings carry further implications for multidisciplinary management of post-stroke patients with chronic pain.

5 March 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVeronica Marinelli
Veronica Marinelli
ODOlivia Purnima Danzi
Olivia Purnima Danzi
MMMaria Angela Mazzi
Maria Angela Mazzi
ESErica Secchettin
Erica Secchettin
MTMassimiliano Tuveri
Massimiliano Tuveri
LPLIDIA DEL PICCOLO
LIDIA DEL PICCOLO
Introduction: The aim of the present paper is to establish feasibility and required power of a one-session psychological intervention devoted to increasing patient’s self-efficacy and awareness in dealing with anxiety symptoms before major pancreatic cancer surgery. Methods: Parallel assignment RCT. All consenting patients listed for pancreatic major surgery during day-hospital visits (T0) between June 2017–June 2018 were assigned randomly in blocks of ten to a psychological intervention vs usual care group to be held the day before surgery (T1). The psychological intervention provided the patient the opportunity to increase self-efficacy in dealing with anxiety by talking with a psychologist about personal concerns and learning mindfulness based techniques to cope with anxiety. Results: 400 patients were randomized into the experimental vs. usual care group. 49 and 65, respectively, completed baseline and post-intervention measures. The dropout rate between day-hospital (T0) and pre-surgery intervention (T1) was high (74.5%) due to several management and organization pitfalls. The main outcome, perceived self-efficacy in managing anxiety, showed a significant increase in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.001), and was related to a reduction in state anxiety (p < 0.001). The intervention group perceived also lower emotional pain (p = 0.03). A power analysis was performed to define the appropriate sample size in a definitive RCT. Conclusion: Beneath the complexity in retaining patients along their trajectory in pancreatic surgery department, when they had the opportunity to follow a brief psychological intervention, most of them adhered, showing a significant reduction in preoperative emotional distress and less emotional pain perception after surgery. Even if results need caution because of the high attrition rate, we can infer that our psychological intervention has the potential to be proposed in surgical setting, being short, easy to learn and applicable to a wide range of patients. Clinical Trial Registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03408002). The full protocol is available from the last author.