Sven Vanneste

Prof. Dr. Sven Vanneste

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
AAAndrea Antal
Andrea Antal
Samar AyacheSamar Ayache
Samar Ayache
DBDAVID BENNINGER
DAVID BENNINGER
JBJerome Brunelin
Jerome Brunelin
WPWalter Paulus
Walter Paulus

15 August 2010 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSven Vanneste
Sven Vanneste
MPMark Plazier
Mark Plazier
ELElsa van der Loo
Elsa van der Loo
CHCaroline Van De Heyning
Caroline Van De Heyning
MCMarco Congedo
Marco Congedo
DRDirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder

1 July 2014 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder
SVSven Vanneste
Sven Vanneste
NWNathan Weisz
Nathan Weisz
ALAlain Londero
Alain Londero
Winfried SchleeWinfried Schlee
Winfried Schlee
BLBerthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth

1 May 2010 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder
SVSven Vanneste
Sven Vanneste
MPMark Plazier
Mark Plazier
ELElsa van der Loo
Elsa van der Loo
TMTomas Menovsky
Tomas Menovsky
Spinal cord stimulation is commonly used for neuropathic pain modulation. The major side effect is the onset of paresthesia. The authors describe a new stimulation design that suppresses pain as well as, or even better than, the currently used stimulation, but without creating paresthesia. A spinal cord electrode (Lamitrode) for neuropathic pain was implanted in 12 patients via laminectomy: 4 at the C2 level and 7 at the T8-T9 level for cervicobrachialgia and lumboischialgia, respectively (1 at T11 at another center). During external stimulation, the patients received the classic tonic stimulation (40 or 50 Hz) and the new burst stimulation (40-Hz burst with 5 spikes at 500 Hz per burst). Pain scores were measured using a visual analog scale and the McGill Short Form preoperatively and during tonic and burst stimulation. Paresthesia was scored as present or not present. Burst stimulation was significantly better for pain suppression, by both the visual analog scale score and the McGill Short Form score. Paresthesia was present in 92% of patients during tonic stimulation, and in only 17% during burst stimulation. Average follow-up was 20.5 months. The authors present a new method of spinal cord stimulation using bursts that suppress neuropathic pain without the mandatory paresthesia. Pain suppression seems as good as or potentially better than that achieved with the currently used stimulation. Average follow-up after nearly 2 years (20.5 months) suggests that this stimulation design is stable.

1 November 2013 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder
MPMark Plazier
Mark Plazier
NKNiels Kamerling
Niels Kamerling
TMTomas Menovsky
Tomas Menovsky
SVSven Vanneste
Sven Vanneste

16 September 2015 in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AEAna Belén Elgoyhen
Ana Belén Elgoyhen
BLBerthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth
DRDirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder
SVSven Vanneste
Sven Vanneste