Giovanni Ottoboni

Prof. Dr. Giovanni Ottoboni

Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni, 33, 40126 Bologna BO, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2004 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRaffaella Ida Rumiati
Raffaella Ida Rumiati
PWPeter H Weiss
Peter H Weiss
TSTim Shallice
Tim Shallice
GOGiovanni Ottoboni
Giovanni Ottoboni
JNJohannes Noth
Johannes Noth
GFGereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink

24 March 2021 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAlessandro Pappadà
Alessandro Pappadà
RCRabih Chattat
Rabih Chattat
ICIlaria Chirico
Ilaria Chirico
MVMarco Valente
Marco Valente
GOGiovanni Ottoboni
Giovanni Ottoboni
Objectives: Technology can assist and support both people with dementia (PWD) and caregivers. Recently, technology has begun to embed remote components. Timely with respect to the pandemic, the present work reviews the most recent literature on technology in dementia contexts together with the newest studies about technological support published until October 2020. The final aim is to provide a synthesis of the timeliest evidence upon which clinical and non-clinical decision-makers can rely to make choices about technology in the case of further pandemic waves.Methods: A review of reviews was performed alongside a review of the studies run during the first pandemic wave. PsycInfo, CINAHL, and PubMed-online were the databases inspected for relevant papers published from January 2010.Results: The search identified 420 articles, 30 of which were reviews and nine of which were new studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Studies were first sorted according to the target population, then summarized thematically in a narrative synthesis. The studies targeting technologies for PWD were categorized as follows: monitoring and security purposes, sustaining daily life, and therapeutic interventions. Each category showed potential benefits. Differently, the interventions for caregivers were classified as informative, psycho-education programs, psychosocial-supportive, therapeutic, and cognitive/physical training. Benefits to mental health, skills learning, and social aspects emerged.Conclusions: The evidence shows that technology is well-accepted and can support PWD and caregivers to bypass physical and environmental problems both during regular times and during future pandemic waves. Nevertheless, the lack of a common methodological background is revealed by this analysis. Further and more standardized research is necessary to improve the implementation of technologies in everyday life while respecting the necessary personalization.

1 August 2008 in Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LVLari Vainio
Lari Vainio
ESEd Symes
Ed Symes
RERob Ellis
Rob Ellis
MTMike Tucker
Mike Tucker
GOGiovanni Ottoboni
Giovanni Ottoboni

1 January 2008 in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEd Symes
Ed Symes
MTMike Tucker
Mike Tucker
RERob Ellis
Rob Ellis
LVLari Vainio
Lari Vainio
GOGiovanni Ottoboni
Giovanni Ottoboni
A series of experiments provided converging support for the hypothesis that action preparation biases selective attention to action-congruent object features. When visual transients are masked in so-called change-blindness scenes, viewers are blind to substantial changes between 2 otherwise identical pictures that flick back and forth. The authors report data in which participants planned a grasp prior to the onset of a change-blindness scene in which 1 of 12 objects changed identity. Change blindness was substantially reduced for grasp-congruent objects (e.g., planning a whole-hand grasp reduced change blindness to a changing apple). A series of follow-up experiments ruled out an alternative explanation that this reduction had resulted from a labeling or strategizing of responses and provided converging support that the effect genuinely arose from grasp planning.

MVMarco Valente
Marco Valente
ICIlaria Chirico
Ilaria Chirico
GOGiovanni Ottoboni
Giovanni Ottoboni
RCRabih Chattat
Rabih Chattat
Most studies have been concerned with the experiences and needs of women with breast cancer and spouses/partners separately. In this review, the relationship dynamics that characterize the couple’s experience of breast cancer treatment were investigated. Findings will inform both researchers and professionals in the area of oncology. A systematic literature search was performed in CINAHL, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. A checklist for qualitative and observational studies was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Seventeen studies were included, and the synthesis of the literature revealed five domains that characterized the dyadic process: dyadic coping strategies, psychosocial support, communication, the couple’s sexual life and spirituality. The included studies provide the basis for knowledge and awareness about the experience of couples with cancer, the specific dimensions enacted during the breast cancer treatment path and the type of responses that are associated with a positive couple’s adjustment to the disease.

25 August 2022 in International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICIlaria Chirico
Ilaria Chirico
CGClarissa Giebel
Clarissa Giebel
Katarzyna Malgorzata LionKatarzyna Malgorzata Lion
Katarzyna Malgorzata Lion
MMMaria Mackowiak
Maria Mackowiak
RCRabih Chattat
Rabih Chattat
GOGiovanni Ottoboni
Giovanni Ottoboni