Background: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, particularly extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales, has brought renewed interest in temocillin, a narrow-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic first introduced in the 1980s. Objectives: We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the microbiological, pharmacological, and clinical profile of temocillin. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature using the PubMed database to identify relevant studies concerning the microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical applications, and safety of temocillin. Results: Temocillin shows strong in vitro activity against ESBL- and AmpC-producing organisms, and partial efficacy against certain Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing strains. Its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, including β-lactamase stability and low ecological impact, support its use in urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, intra-abdominal infections, pneumonia, and central nervous system infections. Additionally, evidence supports its utility in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), including subcutaneous administration, and in vulnerable populations such as pediatric, elderly, and immunocompromised patients. Temocillin demonstrates a favorable safety profile, minimal disruption of gut microbiota, and cost-effectiveness. It also exhibits synergistic activity with agents like fosfomycin, further enhancing its clinical value. Most of the current evidence is derived from retrospective and observational studies. Conclusions: Temocillin emerges as a promising carbapenem-sparing option for the treatment of challenging infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

A continuous demand for assistance and an overcrowded emergency department (ED) require early and safe discharge of low-risk severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients. We developed (n = 128) and validated (n = 330) the acute PNeumonia early assessment (aPNea) score in a tertiary hospital and preliminarily tested the score on an external secondary hospital (n = 97). The score’s performance was compared to that of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). The composite outcome of either death or oral intubation within 30 days from admission occurred in 101 and 28 patients in the two hospitals, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the aPNea model was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78–0.93) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73–0.89) for the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The aPNea score discriminated low-risk patients better than NEWS2 at a 10% outcome probability, corresponding to five cut-off points and one cut-off point, respectively. aPNea’s cut-off reduced the number of unnecessary hospitalizations without missing outcomes by 27% (95% CI, 9–41) in the validation cohort. NEWS2 was not significant. In the external cohort, aPNea’s cut-off had 93% sensitivity (95% CI, 83–102) and a 94% negative predictive value (95% CI, 87–102). In conclusion, the aPNea score appears to be appropriate for discharging low-risk SARS-CoV-2-infected patients from the ED.

Infliximab is an IgG1 antitumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody that is commonly used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other autoimmune disorders. However, it is known to increase the risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis (LTBI) due to its capability to disrupt TB granulomas. We describe a case of extrapulmonary TB in a patient with ulcerative colitis who was treated with Infliximab after a negative Quantiferon Test. In addition, we report briefly on the current controversy about the appropriateness, interval, and methods for the repeated screening of latent TB in IBD patients that are treated with antitumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) antibodies.

Background and aim: There is a need to determine which clinical variables predict the severity of COVID-19. We analyzed a series of critically ill COVID-19 patients to see if any of our dataset's clinical variables were associated with patient outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of the Hospital in Pordenone from March 11, 2020, to April 17, 2020. Patients' characteristics of survivors and deceased groups were compared. The variables with a different distribution between the two groups were implemented in a generalized linear regression model (LM) and in an Artificial Neural Network (NN) model to verify the "robustness" of the association with mortality. Results: In the considered period, we reviewed the data of 22 consecutive patients: 8 died. The causes of death were a severe respiratory failure (3), multi-organ failure (1), septic shock (1), pulmonary thromboembolism (2), severe hemorrhage (1). Lymphocyte and the platelet count were significantly lower in the group of deceased patients (p-value 0.043 and 0.020, respectively; cut-off values: 660/mm3; 280,000/mm3, respectively). Prothrombin time showed a statistically significant trend (p-value= 0.065; cut-off point: 16.8/sec). The LM model (AIC= 19.032), compared to the NN model (Mean Absolute Error, MAE = 0.02), was substantially alike (MSE 0.159 vs. 0.136). Conclusions: In the context of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU, lymphocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and lengthening of prothrombin time were strictly correlated with higher mortality. Additional clinical data are needed to be able to validate this prognostic score.

SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events, especially during severe forms of disease. Here we describe the clinical history of a patient with a mild form of Covid-19 infection presenting with multiple cerebral ischemic lesions that evolved in an atypical way.

Clostridioides difficile infection complicating severe bacterial infections presents a therapeutic challenge, when antimicrobial discontinuation is unfeasible. Eravacycline, a synthetic fluorocycline with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria, including C. difficile, carries a relatively low risk of inducing C. difficile. Although approved for complicated intra-abdominal infections, emerging evidence indicates its potential for other severe infections. We report three cases of C. difficile infection during systemic antibacterial therapy for severe infections complicated by sepsis. In all cases, antibiotics could not be discontinued due to uncontrolled infection. Switching to intravenous eravacycline, alongside C. difficile-directed therapy, allowed clinical improvement of the underlying infection and resolution of diarrhea, with no eravacycline-related adverse events. Two patients survived to discharge without recurrence at 90-day follow-up, whereas one patient died from unrelated complications. This limited experience indicates that eravacycline might be a microbiome-sparing stewardship option in selected severe infections complicated by C. difficile infection.