Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium renowned for its resilience and adaptability across diverse environments, including clinical settings, where it emerges as a formidable pathogen. Notorious for causing nosocomial infections, P. aeruginosa presents a significant challenge due to its intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. This comprehensive review aims to delve into the intricate resistance mechanisms employed by P. aeruginosa and to discern how these mechanisms can be inferred by analyzing sensitivity patterns displayed in antibiograms, emphasizing the complexities encountered in clinical management. Traditional monotherapies are increasingly overshadowed by the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains, necessitating a paradigm shift towards innovative combination therapies and the exploration of novel antibiotics. The review accentuates the critical role of accurate antibiogram interpretation in guiding judicious antibiotic use, optimizing therapeutic outcomes, and mitigating the propagation of antibiotic resistance. Misinterpretations, it cautions, can inadvertently foster resistance, jeopardizing patient health and amplifying global antibiotic resistance challenges. This paper advocates for enhanced clinician proficiency in interpreting antibiograms, facilitating informed and strategic antibiotic deployment, thereby improving patient prognosis and contributing to global antibiotic stewardship efforts.

Background: Biofilm-associated infections frequently span multiple body sites and represent a significant clinical challenge, often requiring a multidisciplinary approach involving surgery and antimicrobial therapy. These infections are commonly healthcare-associated and frequently related to internal or external medical devices. The formation of biofilms complicates treatment, as they create environments that are difficult for most antimicrobial agents to penetrate. Fluoroquinolones play a critical role in the eradication of biofilm-related infections. Numerous studies have investigated the synergistic potential of combining fluoroquinolones with other chemical agents to augment their efficacy while minimizing potential toxicity. Comparative research suggests that the antibiofilm activity of fluoroquinolones is superior to that of beta-lactams and glycopeptides. However, their activity remains less effective than that of minocycline and fosfomycin. Noteworthy combinations include fluoroquinolones with fosfomycin and aminoglycosides for enhanced activity against Gram-negative organisms and fluoroquinolones with minocycline and rifampin for more effective treatment of Gram-positive infections. Despite the limitations of fluoroquinolones due to the intrinsic characteristics of this antibiotic, they remain fundamental in this setting thanks to their bioavailability and synergisms with other drugs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/Google Scholar) and books written by experts in microbiology and infectious diseases to identify relevant studies on fluoroquinolones and biofilm. Results: This review critically assesses the role of fluoroquinolones in managing biofilm-associated infections in various clinical settings while also exploring the potential benefits of combination therapy with these antibiotics. Conclusions: The literature predominantly consists of in vitro studies, with limited in vivo investigations. Although real world data are scarce, they are in accordance with fluoroquinolones’ effectiveness in managing early biofilm-associated infections. Also, future perspectives of newer treatment options to be placed alongside fluoroquinolones are discussed. This review underscores the role of fluoroquinolones in the setting of biofilm-associated infections, providing a comprehensive guide for physicians regarding the best use of this class of antibiotics while highlighting the existing critical issues.

Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) are a heterogeneous group of opportunistic pathogens increasingly associated with healthcare-associated infections. While Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are well known, rarer species such as Burkholderia cepacia complex, Achromobacter spp., Chryseobacterium spp., Elizabethkingia spp., Ralstonia spp., and others pose emerging therapeutic challenges. Their intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms limit effective treatment options, making targeted therapy essential. Objectives: This narrative review summarizes the current understanding of rare and unusual NFGNB, their clinical significance, resistance profiles, and evidence-based therapeutic strategies. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies on the epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment approaches to rare NFGNB. Results: Rare NFGNB exhibits diverse resistance mechanisms, including β-lactamase production, efflux pumps, and porin modifications. Treatment selection depends on species-specific susceptibility patterns, but some cornerstones can be individuated. Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors and combination therapy approaches are being explored for multidrug-resistant isolates. However, clinical data remain limited. Conclusions: The increasing incidence of rare NFGNB requires heightened awareness and a tailored therapeutic approach. Given the paucity of clinical guidelines, antimicrobial stewardship and susceptibility-guided treatment are crucial in optimizing patient outcomes.

Cryptic Aspergillus species are increasingly recognized as pathogens involved in human disease. They are ubiquitarian fungi with high tenacity in their environment and can express various resistance mechanisms, often due to exposure to antifungal agents employed in agriculture and farming. The identification of such species is increasing thanks to molecular techniques, and a better description of this type of pathogen is granted. Nevertheless, the number of species and their importance in the clinical setting still need to be well studied. Furthermore, their cross-sectional involvement in animal disease, plants, and human activities requires a multidisciplinary approach involving experts from various fields. This comprehensive review aims to provide a sharp vision of the cryptic Aspergillus species, from the importance of correct identification to the better management of the infections caused by these pathogens. The review also accentuates the importance of the One Health approach for this kind of microorganism, given the interconnection between environmental exposure and aspergillosis, embracing transversely the multidisciplinary process for managing the cryptic Aspergillus species. The paper advocates the need for improving knowledge in this little-known species, given the burden of economic and health implications related to the diffusion of these bugs.

The cutoff value of the commercial interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (QuantiFERON-CMV) proposed by the manufacturer is assumed to be predictive. We aimed to determine the optimal cutoff value for protection against clinically significant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection within 30 days. We analyzed two different cohorts: adult CMV seropositive kidney transplant (KT) recipients with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction from the TIMOVAL study and seropositive lung transplant (LT) patients from the CYTOCOR study. The optimal cutoff value was established using Youden’s index. We estimated the predictive capacity of the cutoff value through the AUROC and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the assay at the different cutoff values. We finally evaluated clinical variables that could improve the predictive ability of the assay on a predictive score. Four hundred-four samples from 130 transplant recipients were analyzed. The optimal cutoff value was ≥2.2 IU/mL for both populations, with a positive predictive value of 99% and 99.5% (95% CI, 98–100%) for KT and LT recipients, respectively. The AUROC of the predictive score was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73–0.97). Using the proposed cutoff value and the Quanti-CMV score may allow the individualization of preventive strategies and serve as an objective tool to support clinical decision-making.