Background: Ubiquitous digital technologies such as smartphone sensors promise to fundamentally change biomedical research and treatment monitoring in neurological diseases such as PD, creating a new domain of digital biomarkers.Objectives: The present study assessed the feasibility, reliability, and validity of smartphone‐based digital biomarkers of PD in a clinical trial setting.Methods: During a 6‐month, phase 1b clinical trial with 44 Parkinson participants, and an independent, 45‐day study in 35 age‐matched healthy controls, participants completed six daily motor active tests (sustained phonation, rest tremor, postural tremor, finger‐tapping, balance, and gait), then carried the smartphone during the day (passive monitoring), enabling assessment of, for example, time spent walking and sit‐to‐stand transitions by gyroscopic and accelerometer data.Results: Adherence was acceptable: Patients completed active testing on average 3.5 of 7 times/week. Sensor‐based features showed moderate‐to‐excellent test‐retest reliability (average intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84). All active and passive features significantly differentiated PD from controls with P < 0.005. All active test features except sustained phonation were significantly related to corresponding International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society–Sponsored UPRDS clinical severity ratings. On passive monitoring, time spent walking had a significant (P = 0.005) relationship with average postural instability and gait disturbance scores. Of note, for all smartphone active and passive features except postural tremor, the monitoring procedure detected abnormalities even in those Parkinson participants scored as having no signs in the corresponding International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society–Sponsored UPRDS items at the site visit.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of smartphone‐based digital biomarkers and indicate that smartphone‐sensor technologies provide reliable, valid, clinically meaningful, and highly sensitive phenotypic data in Parkinson's disease. © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Background: Current clinical assessments of people with multiple sclerosis are episodic and may miss critical features of functional fluctuations between visits. Objective: The goal of the research was to assess the feasibility of remote active testing and passive monitoring using smartphones and smartwatch technology in people with multiple sclerosis with respect to adherence and satisfaction with the FLOODLIGHT test battery. Methods: People with multiple sclerosis (aged 20 to 57 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale 0-5.5; n=76) and healthy controls (n=25) performed the FLOODLIGHT test battery, comprising active tests (daily, weekly, every two weeks, or on demand) and passive monitoring (sensor-based gait and mobility) for 24 weeks using a smartphone and smartwatch. The primary analysis assessed adherence (proportion of weeks with at least 3 days of completed testing and 4 hours per day passive monitoring) and questionnaire-based satisfaction. In-clinic assessments (clinical and magnetic resonance imaging) were performed. Results: People with multiple sclerosis showed 70% (16.68/24 weeks) adherence to active tests and 79% (18.89/24 weeks) to passive monitoring; satisfaction score was on average 73.7 out of 100. Neither adherence nor satisfaction was associated with specific population characteristics. Test-battery assessments had an at least acceptable impact on daily activities in over 80% (61/72) of people with multiple sclerosis. Conclusions: People with multiple sclerosis were engaged and satisfied with the FLOODLIGHT test battery. FLOODLIGHT sensor-based measures may enable continuous assessment of multiple sclerosis disease in clinical trials and real-world settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02952911; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02952911

Background: Sensor-based monitoring tools fill a critical gap in multiple sclerosis (MS) research and clinical care. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess performance characteristics of the Floodlight Proof-of-Concept (PoC) app. Methods: In a 24-week study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02952911), smartphone-based active tests and passive monitoring assessed cognition (electronic Symbol Digit Modalities Test), upper extremity function (Pinching Test, Draw a Shape Test), and gait and balance (Static Balance Test, U-Turn Test, Walk Test, Passive Monitoring). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and age- or sex-adjusted Spearman’s rank correlation determined test–retest reliability and correlations with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measures, respectively. Results: Seventy-six people with MS (PwMS) and 25 healthy controls were enrolled. In PwMS, ICCs were moderate-to-good (ICC(2,1) = 0.61–0.85) across tests. Correlations with domain-specific standard clinical disability measures were significant for all tests in the cognitive ( r = 0.82, p < 0.001), upper extremity function (|r|= 0.40–0.64, all p < 0.001), and gait and balance domains ( r = −0.25 to −0.52, all p < 0.05; except for Static Balance Test: r = −0.20, p > 0.05). Most tests also correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale, 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale items or subscales, and/or normalized brain volume. Conclusion: The Floodlight PoC app captures reliable and clinically relevant measures of functional impairment in MS, supporting its potential use in clinical research and practice.