Na Cap

Ms. Na Cap

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in Neuroscience Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNa Cap
Na Cap
YPYanling Pi
Yanling Pi
KLKe Liu
Ke Liu
HMHaijiang Meng
Haijiang Meng
YWYanqiu Wang
Yanqiu Wang
XTXiaoying Tan
Xiaoying Tan

18 September 2020 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXiaoxia Yuan
Xiaoxia Yuan
YYYuan Yang
Yuan Yang
NCNa Cap
Na Cap
CJChanghao Jiang
Changhao Jiang
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive brain-stimulation technique that transiently modulates cerebral cortex excitability, achieving overall positive results in poststroke motor-function recovery. Excessive inhibition of the ipsilesional-affected hemisphere by the contralesional-unaffected hemisphere has seriously hindered poststroke motor-function recovery. Hence, intracortical disinhibition can be used as an approach to managing poststroke brain injury. This technique promotes neural plasticity for faster motor-function recovery. rTMS relieves unilateral inhibition of the brain function by regulatinga interhemispheric-imbalanced inhibition. This paper summarized 12 studies from 2016 to date, focusing on rTMS on motor function after acute and chronic stroke by regulating the interhemispheric imbalance of inhibitory inputs. Although rTMS studies have shown promising outcomes on recovery of motor functions in stroke patients, different intervention methods may lead to discrepancies in results. A uniform optimal stimulus model cannot routinely be used, mainly due to the stimulus schemes, stroke types and outcome-measuring differences among studies. Thus, the effect of rTMS on poststroke motor-function recovery should be investigated further to standardize the rTMS program for optimal poststroke motor-function recovery. More randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials with standardized rTMS protocols are needed to ensure the effectiveness of the treatment.

1 March 2022 in Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYitong Lin
Yitong Lin
YPYanling Pi
Yanling Pi
YWYanqiu Wang
Yanqiu Wang
XXXue Xia
Xue Xia
FQFanghui Qiu
Fanghui Qiu
XTXiaoying Tan
Xiaoying Tan

18 March 2019 in Brain and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHai‐Jiang Meng
Hai‐Jiang Meng
NCNa Cap
Na Cap
YLYi‐Tong Lin
Yi‐Tong Lin
KLKe Liu
Ke Liu
JZJian Zhang​
Jian Zhang​
YPYan‐Ling Pi
Yan‐Ling Pi
Background: Motor imagery (MI) improves motor skill learning, which is further enhanced when MI is paired with primary motor cortex transcranial brain stimulation or with electrical stimulation of the peripheral median nerve. Applying both stimulation types (here with 25 ms intervals) is called paired associative stimulation (PAS25). The final primary motor cortex output is determined by combined excitatory and intracortical inhibitory circuits, and reducing the latter is associated with enhanced synaptic transmission and efficacy. Indeed, short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) inhibits motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and motor learning has been associated with decreased SICI and increased cortical excitability. Here, we investigated whether cortical excitability and SICI are altered by PAS25 applied after MI‐induced modulation of motor learning.Methods: Peak acceleration of a hand‐grasping movement and MEPs and SICI were measured before and after MI alone, PAS25 alone, and MI followed by PAS25 in 16 healthy participants to evaluate changes in motor learning, corticospinal excitability, and intracortical inhibition.Results: After PAS25 alone, MEP amplitude increased while peak acceleration was unchanged. However, PAS25 applied following MI not only significantly enhanced both peak acceleration (p = 0.011) and MEP amplitude (p = 0.004) but also decreased SICI (p = 0.011). Moreover, we found that this decrease in SICI was significantly correlated with both the peak acceleration (r = 0.49, p = 0.029) and the MEP amplitude (r = 0.56, p = 0.013).Conclusions: These results indicate that brain function altered by PAS25 of the motor cortex enhances MI‐induced motor learning and corticospinal excitability and decreases SICI, suggesting that SICI underlies, at least in part, PAS25 modulation of motor learning.