Current legislation in Spain indicates that table olives must be free of off-odors and off-flavors and without symptoms of ongoing alteration or abnormal fermentations. In this regard, the International Olive Council (IOC) has developed a protocol for the sensory classification of table olives according to the intensity of the predominantly perceived defect (PPD). An electronic nose (e-nose) was used to assess the abnormal fermentation defects of Spanish-style table olives that were previously classified by a tasting panel according to the IOC protocol, namely zapateria, butyric, putrid, and musty or humidity. When olives with different defects were mixed, the putrid defect had the greatest sensory impact on the others, while the butyric defect had the least sensory dominance. A total of 49 volatile compounds were identified by gas chromatography, and each defect was characterized by a specific profile. The e-nose data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). The different defects were clearly separated from each other and from the control treatment, independently of PPD intensity. Moreover, the e-nose differentiated control olives from table olives with combined sensory defects despite the dilution effect resulting from the combination. These results demonstrate that e-nose can be used as an olfactory sensor for the organoleptic classification of table olives and can successfully support the tasting panel.
Acrylamide, a compound identified as a probable carcinogen, is generated during the sterilization phase employed during the processing of Californian-style green ripe olives. It is possible to reduce the content of this toxic compound by applying different strategies during the processing of green ripe olives. The influence of different processing conditions on acrylamide content was studied in three olives varieties (“Manzanilla de Sevilla”, “Hojiblanca”, and “Manzanilla Cacereña”). Olives harvested during the yellow–green stage presented higher acrylamide concentrations than green olives. A significant reduction in acrylamide content was observed when olives were washed with water at 25 °C for 45 min (25% reduction) and for 2 h (45% reduction) prior to lye treatment. Stone olives had 21–26% higher acrylamide levels than pitted olives and 42–50% higher levels than sliced olives in the three studied varieties. When calcium chloride (CaCl2) was added to the brine and brine sodium chloride (NaCl) increased from 2% to 4%, olives presented higher concentrations of this contaminant. The addition of additives did not affect acrylamide levels when olives were canned without brine. Results from this study are very useful for the table olive industry to identify critical points in the production of Californian-style green ripe olives, thus, helping to control acrylamide formation in this foodstuff.
The degradation process of virgin olive oil (VOO) is related to storage time and the type of storage container used. The aim of this work is to explore the evolution of the VOO quality stored in different container types over a defined storage period in order to predict the organoleptic characteristics using a non-destructive technique such as the electronic-nose (E-nose). The “Picual” variety VOO was stored in different containers over a period of 21 months and monitored using sensory analysis, volatile compounds, and an E-nose. The panelists showed that oil stored in dark glass bottles and in green polyethylene bottles began to show defects after 12 and 15 weeks, respectively. However, oil stored in tin containers retained its quality throughout the 21 months studied. A total of 31 volatile compounds were identified, and the evolution of the volatile profile in the different containers during the storage period was studied. The E-nose data were able to classify oil quality by container using principal component analysis (PCA). Furthermore, the E-nose data combined with partial least squares (PLS) regression enabled the building of a predictive model to quantify sensory defect values ( = 0.92; = 0.86), evidencing that this technique would be an appropriate screening tool to support a sensory panel.