Barton Forman

Dr. Barton Forman

University of Maryland College Park
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2011 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRolf Reichle
Rolf Reichle
RKRandal D. Koster
Randal D. Koster
GLGabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
Barton FormanBarton Forman
Barton Forman
QLQing Liu
Qing Liu
ATAlly Touré
Ally Touré
The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) is a state-of-the-art reanalysis that provides, in addition to atmospheric fields, global estimates of soil moisture, latent heat flux, snow, and runoff for 1979–present. This study introduces a supplemental and improved set of land surface hydrological fields (“MERRA-Land”) generated by rerunning a revised version of the land component of the MERRA system. Specifically, the MERRA-Land estimates benefit from corrections to the precipitation forcing with the Global Precipitation Climatology Project pentad product (version 2.1) and from revised parameter values in the rainfall interception model, changes that effectively correct for known limitations in the MERRA surface meteorological forcings. The skill (defined as the correlation coefficient of the anomaly time series) in land surface hydrological fields from MERRA and MERRA-Land is assessed here against observations and compared to the skill of the state-of-the-art ECMWF Re-Analysis-Interim (ERA-I). MERRA-Land and ERA-I root zone soil moisture skills (against in situ observations at 85 U.S. stations) are comparable and significantly greater than that of MERRA. Throughout the Northern Hemisphere, MERRA and MERRA-Land agree reasonably well with in situ snow depth measurements (from 583 stations) and with snow water equivalent from an independent analysis. Runoff skill (against naturalized stream flow observations from 18 U.S. basins) of MERRA and MERRA-Land is typically higher than that of ERA-I. With a few exceptions, the MERRA-Land data appear more accurate than the original MERRA estimates and are thus recommended for those interested in using MERRA output for land surface hydrological studies.

17 February 2021 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRhae Sung Kim
Rhae Sung Kim
Sujay KumarSujay Kumar
Sujay Kumar
CVCarrie Vuyovich
Carrie Vuyovich
PHPaul Houser
Paul Houser
JLJessica Lundquist
Jessica Lundquist
SWShugong Wang
Shugong Wang
The Snow Ensemble Uncertainty Project (SEUP) is an effort to establish a baseline characterization of snow water equivalent (SWE) uncertainty across North America with the goal of informing global snow observational needs. An ensemble-based modeling approach, encompassing a suite of current operational models is used to assess the uncertainty in SWE and total snow storage (SWS) estimation over North America during the 2009–2017 period. The highest modeled SWE uncertainty is observed in mountainous regions, likely due to the relatively deep snow, forcing uncertainties, and variability between the different models in resolving the snow processes over complex terrain. This highlights a need for high-resolution observations in mountains to capture the high spatial SWE variability. The greatest SWS is found in Tundra regions where, even though the spatiotemporal variability in modeled SWE is low, there is considerable uncertainty in the SWS estimates due to the large areal extent over which those estimates are spread. This highlights the need for high accuracy in snow estimations across the Tundra. In midlatitude boreal forests, large uncertainties in both SWE and SWS indicate that vegetation–snow impacts are a critical area where focused improvements to modeled snow estimation efforts need to be made. Finally, the SEUP results indicate that SWE uncertainty is driving runoff uncertainty, and measurements may be beneficial in reducing uncertainty in SWE and runoff, during the melt season at high latitudes (e.g., Tundra and Taiga regions) and in the western mountain regions, whereas observations at (or near) peak SWE accumulation are more helpful over the midlatitudes.

11 January 2012 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Barton FormanBarton Forman
Barton Forman
RRRolf Reichle
Rolf Reichle
MRMatthew Rodell
Matthew Rodell

10 July 2017 in Nature Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lu LiuLu Liu
Lu Liu
MHMohamad Hejazi
Mohamad Hejazi
HLHongyi Li
Hongyi Li
Barton FormanBarton Forman
Barton Forman
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang

24 May 2019 in Frontiers in Earth Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYeosang Yoon
Yeosang Yoon
SKSujay V. Kumar
Sujay V. Kumar
Barton FormanBarton Forman
Barton Forman
BZBenjamin Zaitchik
Benjamin Zaitchik
YKYonghwan Kwon
Yonghwan Kwon
AMAbhijit Mukherjee
Abhijit Mukherjee
This study explores the uncertainties in terrestrial water budget estimation over High Mountain Asia (HMA) using a suite of uncoupled land surface model (LSM) simulations. The uncertainty in the water balance components of precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET), runoff (R), and terrestrial water storage (TWS) is significantly impacted by the uncertainty in the driving meteorology, with precipitation being the most important boundary condition. Ten gridded precipitation datasets along with a mix of model-, satellite-, and gauge-based products, are evaluated first to assess their suitability for LSM simulations over HMA. The datasets are evaluated by quantifying the systematic and random errors of these products as well as the temporal consistency of their trends. Though the broader spatial patterns of precipitation are generally well captured by the datasets, they differ significantly in their means and trends. In general, precipitation datasets that incorporate information from gauges are found to have higher accuracy with low Root Mean Square Errors and high correlation coefficient values. An ensemble of LSM simulations with selected subset of precipitation products is then used to produce the mean annual fluxes and their uncertainty over HMA in P, ET, and R to be 2.11 ± 0.45, 1.26 ± 0.11, and 0.85 ± 0.36 mm per day, respectively. The mean annual estimates of the surface mass (water) balance components from this model ensemble are comparable to global estimates from prior studies. However, the uncertainty/spread of P, ET, and R is significantly larger than the corresponding estimates from global studies. A comparison of ET, snow cover fraction, and changes in TWS estimates against remote sensing-based references confirms the significant role of the input meteorology in influencing the water budget characterization over HMA and points to the need for improving meteorological inputs.

1 January 2008 in Ecohydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EVEnrique Vivoni
Enrique Vivoni
ARAlex J. Rinehart
Alex J. Rinehart
LMLuis Méndez
Luis Méndez
CACarlos A. Aragón
Carlos A. Aragón
GBGautam Bisht
Gautam Bisht
RWRobert L. Wyckoff
Robert L. Wyckoff