Emmanuel Gabriel

Dr. Emmanuel Gabriel

Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in International Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEisar Al-Sukhni
Eisar Al-Sukhni
KAKristopher Attwood
Kristopher Attwood
Emmanuel GabrielEmmanuel Gabriel
Emmanuel Gabriel
CLCharles M. LeVea
Charles M. LeVea
KKKazunori Kanehira
Kazunori Kanehira
SNSteven J. Nurkin
Steven J. Nurkin
Lymphovascular and perineural invasion (LVI and PNI) are associated with poor outcomes in several cancers. We sought to identify clinical variables associated with LVI and PNI in colorectal cancer (CRC) and to determine their impact on survival. A retrospective review was performed of the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), 2004-2011. Patients with CRC and a documented LVI or PNI status were included. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the associations between clinical variables and LVI/PNI, PNI and survival, and LVI/PNI and lymph node (LN) status in patients with T1 and T2 tumors. In total, 158,777 patients were included. LVI status was documented for 139,026 patients, 26.3% of whom were positive. PNI status was documented in 142,034 patients, 11.1% of whom were positive. The multivariable model identified a number of pathologic and clinical characteristics associated with the presence of LVI and PNI, including a number of features of advanced CRC. PNI was independently associated with reduced survival (HR 3.55, 95%CI 1.78-7.09). In T1 or T2 tumors, LVI and PNI were significantly associated with LN involvement. LVI and PNI are associated with advanced CRC. PNI is an independent poor prognostic marker for survival in CRC. LVI and PNI are associated with LN involvement in T1 and T2 tumors. Documentation of LVI and PNI status on biopsy specimens may help in prognostication and decision-making in the management of these early tumors.

19 December 2017 in Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSanjay P Bagaria
Sanjay P Bagaria
Emmanuel GabrielEmmanuel Gabriel
Emmanuel Gabriel
GMGary N. Mann
Gary N. Mann

9 January 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNavpreet Rana
Navpreet Rana
RGRohit Gosain
Rohit Gosain
RLRiccardo Lemini
Riccardo Lemini
CWChong Wang
Chong Wang
Emmanuel GabrielEmmanuel Gabriel
Emmanuel Gabriel
Sarbajit MukherjeeSarbajit Mukherjee
Sarbajit Mukherjee
Background: Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for 8.2% of cancer-related deaths. The purpose of this study was to investigate the geographic and sociodemographic disparities in gastric adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in gastric adenocarcinoma patients between 2004 and 2013. Data were obtained from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS). Socio-demographic factors, including the location of residence [metro area (MA) or rural area (RA)], gender, race, insurance status, and marital status, were analyzed. Results: A total of 88,246 [RA, N = 12,365; MA, N = 75,881] patients were included. Univariate and multivariable analysis showed that RA had worse OS (univariate HR = 1.08, p < 0.01; multivariate HR = 1.04; p < 0.01) compared to MA. When comparing different racial backgrounds, Native American and African American populations had poorer OS when compared to the white population; however, Asian patients had a better OS (multivariable HR = 0.68, p < 0.01). From a quality of care standpoint, MA patients had fewer median days to surgery (28 vs. 33; p < 0.01) with fewer positive margins (6.3% vs. 6.9%; p < 0.01) when compared to RA patients. When comparing the extent of lymph node dissection, 19.6% of MA patients underwent an extensive dissection (more than or equal to 15 lymph nodes) in comparison to 18.7% patients in RA (p = 0.03). Discussion: This study identifies socio-demographic disparities in gastric adenocarcinoma. Future health policy initiatives should focus on equitable allocation of resources to improve the outcomes.

20 June 2015 in Surgical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Emmanuel GabrielEmmanuel Gabriel
Emmanuel Gabriel
PTPragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu
Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu
EAEisar Al-Sukhni
Eisar Al-Sukhni
KAKristopher Attwood
Kristopher Attwood
SNSteven J. Nurkin
Steven J. Nurkin

1 February 2023 in Molecular Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SVSneha Vivekanandhan
Sneha Vivekanandhan
DBDeborah Bahr
Deborah Bahr
AKAshish Kothari
Ashish Kothari
MAMohammed Ali Ashary
Mohammed Ali Ashary
MBMizba Baksh
Mizba Baksh
Emmanuel GabrielEmmanuel Gabriel
Emmanuel Gabriel
Cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide, placing a significant burden on healthcare systems as well as the global economy. Rare cancers comprise a group of about 200 cancers that individually occur at extremely low frequencies. In the United States (US), their frequency is approximately 15 cases per 100,000 people, and it is even lower in Europe with approximately 6 cases per 100,000 people. However, combined their frequency of occurrence is much higher than any singular cancer. Cancer treatment and management has tremendously improved in the last decade, particularly with the administration of immune-based therapies. The four most prevalent immune-based therapies are (1) the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, (2) macrophage therapy, (3) Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, and (4) neoantigen-based therapies. In our review, we discuss these various aproaches and their implementation in the treatment of a variety of rare cancers. Furthermore, we discuss their limitations and potential strategies to overcome them to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of these approaches. Finally, our article presents the future directions and other additional immune therapies that may be incorporated into the treatment of rare cancers.

11 May 2020
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Andrea SistiAndrea Sisti
Andrea Sisti
MHMaria T Huayllani
Maria T Huayllani
DBDaniel Boczar
Daniel Boczar
DRDavid J Restrepo
David J Restrepo
ASAaron Spaulding
Aaron Spaulding
Antonio Jorge ForteAntonio Jorge Forte
Antonio Jorge Forte
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in the United States. National Cancer Database (NCDB) is one of the largest tumor databases of the United States. This study aimed to evaluate the features of breast cancer in women from a large updated database. We describe and analyze the frequencies and percentages of the clinical and pathological features of women diagnosed with breast cancer registered in NCDB, in a period from 2004 to 2015. A total of 2,423,875 women were diagnosed with breast cancer between 2004 and 2015. The nationally representative analysis demonstrated that the incidence of breast cancer among women increased over the years. Upper-outer quadrant was the most frequent primary tumor site, and the intraductal carcinoma was the most frequent histology. The prevalence of breast cancer increased with age. The most frequent grade at diagnosis was grade II. Broadly, invasive characteristics were noted more frequently in younger patients. Left and right breast were affected with almost the same frequency, with a slight predominance of the left breast. The most frequent surgical treatment was a partial mastectomy. Reconstruction with implant was the most frequent choice. Post-mastectomy radiation therapy was administered in the majority of patients. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the largest descriptive analysis to date on the clinical and pathological features of breast cancer in a population-based database. The increase in incidence over the years indicates an important need for etiologic research and innovative approaches to improve breast cancer prevention.