Nina Jeliazkova

Dr. Nina Jeliazkova

Ideaconsult Ltd., Sofia, Bulgaria

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2005 in Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNTatiana I. Netzeva
Tatiana I. Netzeva
AWAndrew Worth
Andrew Worth
TATom Aldenberg
Tom Aldenberg
RBRomualdo Benigni
Romualdo Benigni
MCMark Cronin
Mark Cronin
CYChihae Yang
Chihae Yang

1 October 2005 in Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJoanna Jaworska
Joanna Jaworska
Nina JeliazkovaNina Jeliazkova
Nina Jeliazkova
TATom Aldenberg
Tom Aldenberg
As the use of Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models for chemical management increases, the reliability of the predictions from such models is a matter of growing concern. The OECD QSAR Validation Principles recommend that a model should be used within its applicability domain (AD). The Setubal Workshop report provided conceptual guidance on defining a (Q)SAR AD, but it is difficult to use directly. The practical application of the AD concept requires an operational definition that permits the design of an automatic (computerised), quantitative procedure to determine a model's AD. An attempt is made to address this need, and methods and criteria for estimating AD through training set interpolation in descriptor space are reviewed. It is proposed that response space should be included in the training set representation. Thus, training set chemicals are points in n-dimensional descriptor space and m-dimensional model response space. Four major approaches for estimating interpolation regions in a multivariate space are reviewed and compared: range, distance, geometrical, and probability density distribution.

1 July 2008 in SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGrace Patlewicz
Grace Patlewicz
Nina JeliazkovaNina Jeliazkova
Nina Jeliazkova
RSR.J. Safford
R.J. Safford
AWAndrew Worth
Andrew Worth
BAB. Aleksiev
B. Aleksiev
Risk assessment for most human health effects is based on the threshold of a toxicological effect, usually derived from animal experiments. The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a concept that refers to the establishment of a level of exposure for all chemicals below which there would be no appreciable risk to human health. When carefully applied, the TTC concept can provide a means of waiving testing based on knowledge of exposure limits. Two main approaches exist; the first of these is a General Threshold of Toxicological Concern; the second approach is a TTC in relation to structural information and/or toxicological data of chemicals. The structural scheme most routinely used is that of Cramer and co-workers from 1978. Recently this scheme was encoded into a software program called Toxtree, specifically commissioned by the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Here we evaluate two published datasets using Toxtree to demonstrate its concordance and highlight potential software modifications. The results were promising with an overall good concordance between the reported classifications and those generated by Toxtree. Further evaluation of these results highlighted a number of inconsistencies which were examined in turn and rationalised as far as possible. Improvements for Toxtree were proposed where appropriate. Notable of these is a necessity to update the lists of common food components and normal body constituents as these accounted for the majority of false classifications observed. Overall Toxtree was found to be a useful tool in facilitating the systematic evaluation of compounds through the Cramer scheme.

6 June 2017 in Journal of Cheminformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEgon Willighagen
Egon Willighagen
JMJohn W. Mayfield
John W. Mayfield
JAJonathan Alvarsson
Jonathan Alvarsson
ABArvid Berg
Arvid Berg
LCLars Carlsson
Lars Carlsson
CSChristoph Steinbeck
Christoph Steinbeck
The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) is a widely used open source cheminformatics toolkit, providing data structures to represent chemical concepts along with methods to manipulate such structures and perform computations on them. The library implements a wide variety of cheminformatics algorithms ranging from chemical structure canonicalization to molecular descriptor calculations and pharmacophore perception. It is used in drug discovery, metabolomics, and toxicology. Over the last 10 years, the code base has grown significantly, however, resulting in many complex interdependencies among components and poor performance of many algorithms. We report improvements to the CDK v2.0 since the v1.2 release series, specifically addressing the increased functional complexity and poor performance. We first summarize the addition of new functionality, such atom typing and molecular formula handling, and improvement to existing functionality that has led to significantly better performance for substructure searching, molecular fingerprints, and rendering of molecules. Second, we outline how the CDK has evolved with respect to quality control and the approaches we have adopted to ensure stability, including a code review mechanism. This paper highlights our continued efforts to provide a community driven, open source cheminformatics library, and shows that such collaborative projects can thrive over extended periods of time, resulting in a high-quality and performant library. By taking advantage of community support and contributions, we show that an open source cheminformatics project can act as a peer reviewed publishing platform for scientific computing software.

7 March 2017 in Journal of Cheminformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJiangming Sun
Jiangming Sun
Nina JeliazkovaNina Jeliazkova
Nina Jeliazkova
VCVladimir Chupakhin
Vladimir Chupakhin
JGJose-Felipe Golib-Dzib
Jose-Felipe Golib-Dzib
OEOla Engkvist
Ola Engkvist
HCHongming Chen
Hongming Chen
Chemogenomics data generally refers to the activity data of chemical compounds on an array of protein targets and represents an important source of information for building in silico target prediction models. The increasing volume of chemogenomics data offers exciting opportunities to build models based on Big Data. Preparing a high quality data set is a vital step in realizing this goal and this work aims to compile such a comprehensive chemogenomics dataset. This dataset comprises over 70 million SAR data points from publicly available databases (PubChem and ChEMBL) including structure, target information and activity annotations. Our aspiration is to create a useful chemogenomics resource reflecting industry-scale data not only for building predictive models of in silico polypharmacology and off-target effects but also for the validation of cheminformatics approaches in general.

1 February 2020 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKamel Mansouri
Kamel Mansouri
NKNicole Kleinstreuer
Nicole Kleinstreuer
AAAhmed M. Abdelaziz
Ahmed M. Abdelaziz
DADomenico Alberga
Domenico Alberga
VAVinicius Alves
Vinicius Alves
RJRichard Judson
Richard Judson
Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.