Andrew Worth

Dr. Andrew Worth

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2003 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LELennart Eriksson
Lennart Eriksson
JJJoanna Jaworska
Joanna Jaworska
AWAndrew Worth
Andrew Worth
MCMark Cronin
Mark Cronin
RMRobert M McDowell
Robert M McDowell
PGPaola Gramatica
Paola Gramatica
Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

1 April 2005 in Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNTatiana I. Netzeva
Tatiana I. Netzeva
AWAndrew Worth
Andrew Worth
TATom Aldenberg
Tom Aldenberg
RBRomualdo Benigni
Romualdo Benigni
MCMark Cronin
Mark Cronin
CYChihae Yang
Chihae Yang

1 July 2008 in SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGrace Patlewicz
Grace Patlewicz
Nina JeliazkovaNina Jeliazkova
Nina Jeliazkova
RSR.J. Safford
R.J. Safford
AWAndrew Worth
Andrew Worth
BAB. Aleksiev
B. Aleksiev
Risk assessment for most human health effects is based on the threshold of a toxicological effect, usually derived from animal experiments. The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a concept that refers to the establishment of a level of exposure for all chemicals below which there would be no appreciable risk to human health. When carefully applied, the TTC concept can provide a means of waiving testing based on knowledge of exposure limits. Two main approaches exist; the first of these is a General Threshold of Toxicological Concern; the second approach is a TTC in relation to structural information and/or toxicological data of chemicals. The structural scheme most routinely used is that of Cramer and co-workers from 1978. Recently this scheme was encoded into a software program called Toxtree, specifically commissioned by the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Here we evaluate two published datasets using Toxtree to demonstrate its concordance and highlight potential software modifications. The results were promising with an overall good concordance between the reported classifications and those generated by Toxtree. Further evaluation of these results highlighted a number of inconsistencies which were examined in turn and rationalised as far as possible. Improvements for Toxtree were proposed where appropriate. Notable of these is a necessity to update the lists of common food components and normal body constituents as these accounted for the majority of false classifications observed. Overall Toxtree was found to be a useful tool in facilitating the systematic evaluation of compounds through the Cramer scheme.

1 May 2011 in Archives of Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASarah Adler
Sarah Adler
DBDavid Basketter
David Basketter
SCStuart Creton
Stuart Creton
OPOlavi Pelkonen
Olavi Pelkonen
JBJan van Benthem
Jan van Benthem
JZJosé-Manuel Zaldivar
José-Manuel Zaldivar

1 July 2016 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKamel Mansouri
Kamel Mansouri
AAAhmed Abdelaziz
Ahmed Abdelaziz
ARAleksandra Rybacka
Aleksandra Rybacka
ARAlessandra Roncaglioni
Alessandra Roncaglioni
ATAlexander Tropsha
Alexander Tropsha
RJRichard Judson
Richard Judson
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

1 December 2014 in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KTKnut Erik Tollefsen
Knut Erik Tollefsen
SSStefan Scholz
Stefan Scholz
MCMark Cronin
Mark Cronin
SEStephen W. Edwards
Stephen W. Edwards
JKJoop de Knecht
Joop de Knecht
GPGrace Patlewicz
Grace Patlewicz
Chemical regulation is challenged by the large number of chemicals requiring assessment for potential human health and environmental impacts. Current approaches are too resource intensive in terms of time, money and animal use to evaluate all chemicals under development or already on the market. The need for timely and robust decision making demands that regulatory toxicity testing becomes more cost-effective and efficient. One way to realize this goal is by being more strategic in directing testing resources; focusing on chemicals of highest concern, limiting testing to the most probable hazards, or targeting the most vulnerable species. Hypothesis driven Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) have been proposed as practical solutions to such strategic testing. In parallel, the development of the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework, which provides information on the causal links between a molecular initiating event (MIE), intermediate key events (KEs) and an adverse outcome (AO) of regulatory concern, offers the biological context to facilitate development of IATA for regulatory decision making. This manuscript summarizes discussions at the Workshop entitled "Advancing AOPs for Integrated Toxicology and Regulatory Applications" with particular focus on the role AOPs play in informing the development of IATA for different regulatory purposes.