Deivanayagam Hariharan

Dr. Deivanayagam Hariharan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZRZhongnan Ran
Zhongnan Ran
DHDeivanayagam Hariharan
Deivanayagam Hariharan
Benjamin LawlerBenjamin Lawler
Benjamin Lawler
SMSotirios Mamalis
Sotirios Mamalis

1 January 2020 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZRZhongnan Ran
Zhongnan Ran
DHDeivanayagam Hariharan
Deivanayagam Hariharan
Benjamin LawlerBenjamin Lawler
Benjamin Lawler
SMSotirios Mamalis
Sotirios Mamalis

1 June 2019 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDeivanayagam Hariharan
Deivanayagam Hariharan
RYRuinan Yang
Ruinan Yang
YZYingcong Zhou
Yingcong Zhou
BGBrian Gainey
Brian Gainey
SMSotirios Mamalis
Sotirios Mamalis
Benjamin LawlerBenjamin Lawler
Benjamin Lawler

11 November 2018 in International Journal of Engine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBrian Gainey
Brian Gainey
DHDeivanayagam Hariharan
Deivanayagam Hariharan
ZYZiming Yan
Ziming Yan
SZSteven Zilg
Steven Zilg
MBMozhgan Rahimi Boldaji
Mozhgan Rahimi Boldaji
BLBenjamin Lawler
Benjamin Lawler
Thermally stratified compression ignition is a new advanced, low-temperature combustion mode that aims to control the heat release process in a lean, premixed, compression ignition combustion mode by controlling the level of thermal stratification in the cylinder. Specifically, this work uses a mixture of 80% ethanol and 20% water by mass, referred to as “wet ethanol” herein, to increase thermal stratification via evaporative cooling of areas targeted by an injection event during the compression stroke. The experiments conducted aim to both fundamentally understand the effect that a late cycle injection of wet ethanol has on the heat release process, and to use that effect to explore the high-load limit of thermally stratified compression ignition with wet ethanol. At an equivalence ratio of 0.5, injecting just 8% of the fuel during the compression stroke was shown to reduce the peak heat release rate by a factor of 2, subsequently avoiding excessive pressure rise rates. Under pure homogeneous charge compression ignition using wet ethanol as the fuel, the load range was found to be 2.5–3.9 bar gross indicated mean effective pressure. Using a split injection of wet ethanol, the high-load limit was extended to 7.0 bar gross indicated mean effective pressure under naturally aspirated conditions. Finally, intake boost was used to achieve high-load operation with low NOx (oxides of nitrogen (NO or NO2)) emissions and was shown to further increase the high-load limit to 7.6 bar gross indicated mean effective pressure at an intake pressure of 1.43 bar. These results show the ability of a split injection of wet ethanol to successfully control the heat release process and expand the operable load range in low-temperature combustion.

1 February 2019 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYingcong Zhou
Yingcong Zhou
DHDeivanayagam Hariharan
Deivanayagam Hariharan
RYRuinan Yang
Ruinan Yang
SMSotirios Mamalis
Sotirios Mamalis
Benjamin LawlerBenjamin Lawler
Benjamin Lawler

3 April 2018 in SAE International Journal of Engines
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RYRuinan Yang
Ruinan Yang
DHDeivanayagam Hariharan
Deivanayagam Hariharan
SZSteven Zilg
Steven Zilg
BLBenjamin Lawler
Benjamin Lawler
SMSotirios Mamalis
Sotirios Mamalis
This article investigates the effects of various primary reference fuel (PRF) blends, compression ratios, and intake temperatures on the thermodynamics and performance of homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion in a Cooperative Fuels Research (CFR) engine. Combustion phasing was kept constant at a CA50 phasing of 5° after top dead center (aTDC) and the equivalence ratio was kept constant at 0.3. Meanwhile, the compression ratio varied from 8:1 to 15:1 as the PRF blends ranged from pure n-heptane to nearly pure isooctane. The intake temperature was used to match CA50 phasing. In addition to the experimental results, a GT-Power model was constructed to simulate the experimental engine and the model was validated against the experimental data. The GT-Power model and simulation results were used to help analyze the energy flows and thermodynamic conditions tested in the experiment. The results indicate that an increase of compression ratio causes higher thermal efficiency and fuel conversion efficiency; however, at the same compression ratio, an increase in PRF number results in lower efficiency due to the required increase in intake temperature and the associated decrease in charge density. While the efficiency does increase with compression ratio, the results show that the effect of increased expansion work is partially offset by higher heat transfer losses and lower ratios of specific heats at higher compression ratios. The results indicate that the maximum pressure rise rate (MPRR) in HCCI significantly increases with compression ratio. Combustion efficiency shows a strong trend with peak temperature regardless of the PRF number or compression ratio, indicating that the CO-to-CO2 conversion is independent of the parent fuel chemistry in the case of the PRFs, whereas the unburned hydrocarbon emissions showed the opposite trend, depending mostly on the parent fuel’s autoignition tendency.