Fouad Jaber

Dr. Fouad Jaber

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2010 in Journal of Environmental Horticulture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PAPeter A.Y. Ampim
Peter A.Y. Ampim
JSJohn J. Sloan
John J. Sloan
RCRaul I. Cabrera
Raul I. Cabrera
DHDerald A. Harp
Derald A. Harp
Fouad JaberFouad Jaber
Fouad Jaber
Although development of low (extensive) and high (intensive) maintenance green roof systems has progressed significantly, studies on the function of the growing substrate as a living constituent are lacking. The objective of this review paper is to summarize current scientific knowledge on the components, composition, and characteristics of green roof substrates and to identify future research needs. Due to variations in climate and desired plant types, there is no universal growing substrate. An appropriate substrate is expected to provide permanent physical support for plants and possess a fine balance between free drainage and adequate plant available water and nutrient retention. Typical substrate components include minerals in natural or modified forms such as sand, lava rock, or expanded shale, clay and slate; recycled waste materials like crushed bricks or tiles, crushed or aerated concrete and subsoil; stabilized organic matter such as composts; and plastic materials and slow release fertilizers. Proportions of components vary among substrates based on target vegetation, green roof type, and other considerations. Better green roof management for maximum benefits will require characterizing, quantifying and understanding the impacts of plant species and building attributes such as aspect, slope, height and heating on substrate performance, and should be considered for future research.

1 January 2012 in Transactions of the ASABE
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fouad JaberFouad Jaber
Fouad Jaber
SSS. Shukla
S. Shukla

1 October 2017 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YHYoung Gu Her
Young Gu Her
JJJaehak Jeong
Jaehak Jeong
JAJeffrey Arnold
Jeffrey Arnold
LGLeila Gosselink
Leila Gosselink
RGRoger Glick
Roger Glick
Fouad JaberFouad Jaber
Fouad Jaber

7 March 2017 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMijin Seo
Mijin Seo
Fouad JaberFouad Jaber
Fouad Jaber
Raghavan SrinivasanRaghavan Srinivasan
Raghavan Srinivasan
Jaehak JeongJaehak Jeong
Jaehak Jeong
The effects of Low Impact Development (LID) practices on urban runoff and pollutants have proven to be positive in many studies. However, the effectiveness of LID practices can vary depending on different urban patterns. In the present study, the performance of LID practices was explored under three land uses with different urban forms: (1) a compact high-density urban form; (2) a conventional medium-density urban form; and (3) a conservational medium-density urban form. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used and model development was performed to reflect hydrologic behavior by the application of LID practices. Rain gardens, permeable pavements, and rainwater harvesting tanks were considered for simulations, and a modeling procedure for the representation of LID practices in SWAT was specifically illustrated in this context. Simulations were done for each land use, and the results were compared and evaluated. The application of LID practices demonstrated a decrease in surface runoff and pollutant loadings for all land uses, and different reductions were represented in response to the land uses with different urban forms on a watershed scale. In addition, the results among post-LIDs scenarios generally showed lower values for surface runoff and nitrate in the compact high-density urban land use and for total phosphorus in the conventional medium-density urban land use compared to the other land uses. We suggest effective strategies for implementing LID practices.

1 November 2003 in Advances in Water Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fouad JaberFouad Jaber
Fouad Jaber
RMRabi H Mohtar
Rabi H Mohtar

1 March 2021 in Environmental Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAmanda Marie Goldsmith
Amanda Marie Goldsmith
Fouad JaberFouad Jaber
Fouad Jaber
HAHabib Ahmari
Habib Ahmari
CRCharles R. Randklev
Charles R. Randklev
Freshwater unionid mussels are among the most imperiled fauna in North America, and their decline has been partially attributed to sediment from anthropogenic activities. However, there remains a debate regarding the role played by sediment in mussel declines due to a lack of field and laboratory evidence. If sediment is responsible for mussel declines, then a lack of information will likely impede efforts to mitigate species declines and protect remaining habitat. However, if the impacts of sediment are overstated, time and resources may be wasted on a threat that has little bearing on mussel declines or habitat loss. Given this knowledge gap, the purpose of this paper is to review the literature focused on the potential impact of suspended sediment and sedimentation on freshwater mussels. We focused our search on suspended sediment, expressed either as suspended sediment concentration (SSC) or total suspended solids (TSS), and sediment deposition and scour. We found increases in suspended solids could impact mussels by decreasing food availability, physically interfering with filter feeding and respiration, and impeding various aspects of the mussel–host relationship. We also found mussel–sediment thresholds, wherein certain concentrations of sediment caused significant declines in population performance, which could serve as reference points for ecological research and management. Specifically, we found clearance rates (a measure of feeding) were negatively impacted by TSS concentrations >8 mg/L, and respiratory stress occurred at ∼600 mg/L. Declines in fertilization success and glochidial (i.e., mussel larvae) development were observed at TSS values of 15 mg/L, and reproductive failure occurred at 20 mg/L. Impacts on host fish attachment and glochidial encystment occurred at TSS concentrations of 1250–5000 mg/L. Impacts on fish varied depending on the biological endpoint but typically occurred at TSS values ranging from 20 to 5000 mg/L. We also found mussels were sensitive to smothering and mortality occurred at depths as low as 0.6–2.5 cm of substrate. Finally, we found relative shear stress (RSS) values >1, which is a measure of substrate stability in response to scour and entrainment, resulted in significant declines in mussel biodiversity.