BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Normal biometry of the fetal posterior fossa rules out most major anomalies of the cerebellum and vermis. Our aim was to provide new reference data of the fetal vermis in 4 biometric parameters by using 3 imaging modalities, 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging, and to assess the relation among these modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between June 2011 and June 2013. Three different imaging modalities were used to measure vermis biometry: 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging. The vermian parameters evaluated were the maximum superoinferior diameter, maximum anteroposterior diameter, the perimeter, and the surface area. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate centiles for gestational age and to assess the agreement among the 3 imaging modalities. RESULTS: The number of fetuses in the study group was 193, 172, and 151 for 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging, respectively. The mean and median gestational ages were 29.1 weeks, 29.5 weeks (range, 21–35 weeks); 28.2 weeks, 29.05 weeks (range, 21–35 weeks); and 32.1 weeks, 32.6 weeks (range, 27–35 weeks) for 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging, respectively. In all 3 modalities, the biometric measurements of the vermis have shown a linear growth with gestational age. For all 4 biometric parameters, the lowest results were those measured by MR imaging, while the highest results were measured by 3D ultrasound. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was excellent for all measures and all imaging modalities. Limits of agreement were considered acceptable for clinical purposes for all parameters, with excellent or substantial agreement defined by the intraclass correlation coefficient. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging technique–specific reference data should be used for the assessment of the fetal vermis in pregnancy.

Anogenital distance (AGD) is a biomarker for the prenatal hormonal environment. Androgen excess is a key element in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The aim of this study was to assess the sonographic foetal AGD in a population of PCOS mothers in comparison to the general population. Foetal AGD was measured prospectively by 2D ultrasound in PCOS mothers and compared to prenatal AGD nomograms. The results were interpreted regarding maternal and foetal characteristics. The mean sonographic foetal AGD centile measurement in PCOS mothers was significantly longer in comparison to the general population (86.04% ± 18.22; p < 0.001). Estimated foetal weight and birthweight were appropriate for gestational age and did not correlate with AGD. Sonographic foetal AGD was significantly longer in PCOS diabetic mothers and in those who conceived following assisted reproduction treatments when compared to the general population (p < 0.001). Our results support the role of AGD as a biomarker of the prenatal hormonal environment and provide evidence for the hyperandrogenic effect in PCOS pregnancies on foetal androgenic status and genitalia development.

Placenta accreta spectrum constitutes one of the most complicated challenges in modern obstetrics. Given the conflicting data regarding the added value of MRI in the diagnosis of invasive placentat...

Background: Assessment of pelvic configuration is an important factor in the prediction of a successful vaginal birth. However, manual evaluation of the pelvis is practically a vanishing art, and imaging techniques are not available as a real-time bed-side tool. Unlike the obstetrical conjugate diameter (OC) and inter spinous diameter (ISD), the pubic arch angle (PAA) can be easily measured by transperineal ultrasound. Objectives: Three-dimensional computed tomography bone reconstructions were used to measure the three main birth canal diameters, evaluate the correlation between them, and establish the normal reference range for the inlet, mid-, and pelvic outlet. Study design: Measurements of the PAA, obstetric conjugate (OC), and ISD were performed offline using three-dimensional post processing reconstruction in bone algorithm application of the pelvis on examinations performed for suspected renal colic in nonpregnant reproductive age woman. The mean of two measurements was used for statistical analysis which included reproducibility of measurements, regression curve estimation between PAA, OC, and ISD, and calculation of the respective reference range centiles for each PAA degree. Results: Two hundred ninety-eight women comprised the study group. The mean ± SD of the PAA, ISD, and OC were 104.9° (±7.4), 103.8 mm (±7.3), and 129.9 mm (±8.3), respectively. The intra- and interobserver agreement defined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was excellent for all parameters (range 0.905–0.993). A significant positive correlation was found between PAA and ISD and between PAA and OCD (Pearson’s correlation = 0.373 (p < .001), and 0.163 (p = .022), respectively). The best regression formula was found with quadratic regression for inter spinous diameter (ISD): 34.122778 + (0.962182*PAA − 0.002830*PAA²), and linear regression for obstetric conjugate (OC): 110.638397 + 0.183156*PAA. Modeled mean, SD, and reference centiles of the ISD and OCD were calculated using the above regression models as function of the PAA. Conclusions: We report significant correlation between the three pelvic landmarks with greatest impact on the prediction of a successful vaginal delivery: the PAA which is easily measured sonographically and the ISD and OC which are not measurable by ultrasound. This correlation may serve as a basis for future studies to assess its utility and prognostic value for a safe vaginal delivery.

Introduction: The aim of our study was to assess fetal pancreas size of the in a population of well controlled mothers with gestational diabetes. Material and methods: A cross sectional, prospective observational study. Pregnant women at 19-38 weeks of gestation who received glycemic control...

Objective: To assess the capacity of fetal pancreatic size, before standard blood glucose testing for screening and diagnosis, to predict maternal gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of low‐risk pregnant women recruited during routine second‐trimester fetal anatomical screening at 20–25 weeks' gestation at two ultrasound units in Israel between 2017 and 2020. The predictive performance of fetal pancreatic circumference ≥ 80^th and ≥ 90^th centiles and glucose challenge test (GCT) was examined for the outcome of GDM. The independent‐samples t‐test was used to compare mean pancreatic circumference centile between pregnancies with GDM and those without GDM. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with 2 × 2 contingency tables and receiver‐operating‐characteristics (ROC) curves.Results: Overall, 195 women were selected for statistical analysis. Twenty‐four (12.3%) women were diagnosed subsequently with GDM. The mean ± SD fetal pancreatic circumference centile was significantly higher in the GDM group compared with the non‐GDM group (82.4 ± 14.6 vs 62.8 ± 27.6; P < 0.001). The pancreatic circumference centile was correlated positively with the estimated fetal weight centile (Pearson's coefficient, 0.243; P = 0.001). The 80^th centile cut‐off for pancreatic circumference had the highest sensitivity (70.8%) and positive predictive value (23.3%) for future maternal GDM, with the best trade‐off between sensitivity and specificity achieved at the 75^th centile cut‐off (sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 60%). The GCT had better specificity (90.2%) and negative predictive value (97.9%) compared with both cut‐offs in pancreatic circumference. The area under the ROC curve was higher for pancreatic circumference compared with GCT (0.71 vs 0.64) and only the former was statistically significant (P = 0.001).Conclusions: Fetal pancreatic circumference has a higher positive predictive capacity compared with GCT. Measuring pancreatic circumference can identify pregnancies at high risk for maternal GDM, thereby promoting earlier diagnosis and treatment, decreasing the time period during which the fetus is exposed to high maternal glucose levels and improving infant outcome. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.