Jakub Lickiewicz

Dr. Jakub Lickiewicz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 June 2021 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGIrina Georgieva
Irina Georgieva
PLPeter Lepping
Peter Lepping
VBVasil Bozev
Vasil Bozev
JLJakub Lickiewicz
Jakub Lickiewicz
JPJaroslav Pekara
Jaroslav Pekara
TLTella Lantta
Tella Lantta
We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and panic disorder (PD) among citizens in 11 countries during the Covid-19 pandemic. We explored risks and protective factors most associated with the development of these mental health disorders and their course at 68 days follow up. We acquired 9543 unique responses via an online survey that was disseminated in UK, Belgium, Netherlands, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, India, Latvia, Poland, Romania, and Sweden. The prevalence and new incidence during the pandemic for at least one disorder was 48.6% and 17.6%, with the new incidence of PTSD, anxiety, depression, and panic disorder being 11.4%, 8.4%, 9.3%, and 3%, respectively. Higher resilience was associated with lower mental health burden for all disorders. Ten to thirteen associated factors explained 79% of the variance in PTSD, 80% in anxiety, 78% in depression, and 89% in PD. To reduce the mental health burden, governments should refrain from implementing many highly restrictive and lasting containment measures. Public health campaigns should focus their effort on alleviating stress and fear, promoting resilience, building public trust in government and medical care, and persuading the population of the measures’ effectiveness. Psychosocial services and resources should be allocated to facilitate individual and community-level recovery from the pandemic.

IGIrina Georgieva
Irina Georgieva
TLTella Lantta
Tella Lantta
JLJakub Lickiewicz
Jakub Lickiewicz
JPJaroslav Pekara
Jaroslav Pekara
SWSofia Wikman
Sofia Wikman
PLPeter Lepping
Peter Lepping
National governments took action to delay the transmission of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by implementing different containment measures. We developed an online survey that included 44 different containment measures. We aimed to assess how effective citizens perceive these measures, which measures are perceived as violation of citizens’ personal freedoms, which opinions and demographic factors have an effect on compliance with the measures, and what governments can do to most effectively improve citizens’ compliance. The survey was disseminated in 11 countries: UK, Belgium, Netherlands, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, India, Latvia, Poland, Romania, and Sweden. We acquired 9543 unique responses. Our findings show significant differences across countries in perceived effectiveness, restrictiveness, and compliance. Governments that suffer low levels of trust should put more effort into persuading citizens, especially men, in the effectiveness of the proposed measures. They should provide financial compensation to citizens who have lost their job or income due to the containment measures to improve measure compliance. Policymakers should implement the least restrictive and most effective public health measures first during pandemic emergencies instead of implementing a combination of many restrictive measures, which has the opposite effect on citizens’ adherence and undermines human rights.

JLJakub Lickiewicz
Jakub Lickiewicz
KPKatarzyna Piotrowicz
Katarzyna Piotrowicz
PHPatricia Paulsen Hughes
Patricia Paulsen Hughes
MMMarta Makara-Studzinska
Marta Makara-Studzinska
Background: The number of meteoropaths, or people negatively affected by weather conditions, is rising dramatically. Meteoropathy is developing rapidly due to ever poorer adaptations of people to changes in weather conditions. Strong weather stimuli may not only exacerbate symptoms in people with diseases of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems but may also induce aggressive behavior. Researchers have shown that patients suffering from mental illnesses are most vulnerable to changes in the weather and postulate a connection between the seasons and aggressive behavior. Methods: The goal of the study was to analyze the relationship between coercive measures and weather factors. The researchers identified what meteorological conditions prevailed on days with an increased number of incidents of aggressive behavior leading to the use of physical coercion towards patients in a psychiatric hospital in Poland. In order to determine the impact of weather conditions on the frequency at which physical coercion measures were used, the hospital’s “coercion sheets” from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2017 were analyzed. The data were correlated with meteorological data. In order to determine the relationship between the occurrence of specific weather conditions and the number of coercive interventions (N), researchers utilized Spearman’s rank correlation analysis together with two-dimensional scatter diagrams (dependency models), multiple regression, stepwise regression, frequencies, and conditional probability (%). Results: Lower barometric pressure and foehn wind increased aggressive behavior in patients that led to coercive measures. For temperature (positive correlation) and humidity (negative correlation), there was a poor but statistically significant correlation. Conclusions: Monitoring weather conditions might be useful in predicting and preventing aggression by patients who are susceptible to weather changes

27 January 2025 in International Nursing Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAllison Squires
Allison Squires
HDHillary J. Dutton
Hillary J. Dutton
MCMaria Guadalupe Casales‐Hernandez
Maria Guadalupe Casales‐Hernandez
JLJavier Isidro Rodriguez López
Javier Isidro Rodriguez López
JJJuana Jimenez‐Sanchez
Juana Jimenez‐Sanchez
SJSimon Jones
Simon Jones

23 May 2022 in International Journal of Nursing Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AZAnna Zisberg
Anna Zisberg
JLJakub Lickiewicz
Jakub Lickiewicz
ARAmos Rogozinski
Amos Rogozinski
SHSabine Hahn
Sabine Hahn
CMCedric Mabire
Cedric Mabire
ASAllison Squires
Allison Squires

JLJakub Lickiewicz
Jakub Lickiewicz
PJPawel Jagielski
Pawel Jagielski
PHPatricia Paulsen Hughes
Patricia Paulsen Hughes
MMMarta Makara-Studzinska
Marta Makara-Studzinska
Phenomenon: Patient aggression directed toward medical personnel, including medical school students during their internships, is an increasingly important issue. To minimize this phenomenon, violence management training programs were carried out. Approach: To assess the efficacy of a violence management training program among medical school students and evaluate changes in the perception of aggressive behavior in relation to the participants’ sense of self-efficacy and self-confidence by sex. A quasi-experimental examination of medical school students was performed before and after completion of a training program. Two hundred seventy-six students, including students of medicine, nursing, emergency medical services, and physiotherapy, participated in the study. Three standardized questionnaires were used: The Perception of Aggression Scale (POAS), the Hope for Success Questionnaire (HSQ), and the General Self -Efficacy Scale (GSES). Findings: The training program had a positive impact on the sense of self-efficacy in both men and women. However, the perception of aggressive behavior changed only in women and the impact of such intervention was higher for women. Further studies should look at the long-term outcomes.