Ian Ashton

Dr. Ian Ashton

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAndrew J. Watson
Andrew J. Watson
USUte Schuster
Ute Schuster
JSJamie D. Shutler
Jamie D. Shutler
THThomas Holding
Thomas Holding
IAIan Ashton
Ian Ashton
Lonneke Goddijn-MurphyLonneke Goddijn-Murphy
Lonneke Goddijn-Murphy
The ocean is a sink for ~25% of the atmospheric CO2 emitted by human activities, an amount in excess of 2 petagrams of carbon per year (PgC yr−1). Time-resolved estimates of global ocean-atmosphere CO2 flux provide an important constraint on the global carbon budget. However, previous estimates of this flux, derived from surface ocean CO2 concentrations, have not corrected the data for temperature gradients between the surface and sampling at a few meters depth, or for the effect of the cool ocean surface skin. Here we calculate a time history of ocean-atmosphere CO2 fluxes from 1992 to 2018, corrected for these effects. These increase the calculated net flux into the oceans by 0.8–0.9 PgC yr−1, at times doubling uncorrected values. We estimate uncertainties using multiple interpolation methods, finding convergent results for fluxes globally after 2000, or over the Northern Hemisphere throughout the period. Our corrections reconcile surface uptake with independent estimates of the increase in ocean CO2 inventory, and suggest most ocean models underestimate uptake.

28 May 2018 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RPRyan Pereira
Ryan Pereira
IAIan Ashton
Ian Ashton
BSBita Sabbaghzadeh
Bita Sabbaghzadeh
JSJamie D. Shutler
Jamie D. Shutler
RURobert C. Upstill-Goddard
Robert C. Upstill-Goddard

1 August 2021 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJiaxin Chen
Jiaxin Chen
APAjit C. Pillai
Ajit C. Pillai
LJLars Johanning
Lars Johanning
IAIan Ashton
Ian Ashton

2 March 2022 in Reviews in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SCSophie Corrigan
Sophie Corrigan
ABAndrew Ross Brown
Andrew Ross Brown
IAIan Ashton
Ian Ashton
DSDan A Smale
Dan A Smale
CTCharles R. Tyler
Charles R. Tyler
Macroalgal cultivation is expanding rapidly, and promises to contribute significantly towards future food and energy security, sustainable livelihoods, ecosystem services and habitat provisioning for a range of associated organisms globally. Habitat provisioning underpins biodiversity and ecosystem structure and functioning, supports many ecosystem services and has possible benefits to other marine industries, including enhancement of commercial fish stocks. In macroalgal cultivation, however, only recently has habitat provisioning started to be assessed at a local scale (within a farm's footprint) and with a range of different approaches. This review evaluates techniques used to quantify habitat provisioning in and around macroalgal cultivation sites, for species ranging from microorganisms to megafauna, and outlines recommendations to enable a more comprehensive ecological valuation of macroalgal cultivation in the future. The majority of information on biodiversity associated with macroalgal cultivation is associated with quantifying biofouling or pest organisms, rather than the contribution of colonising species to healthy ecosystem functioning. We suggest how better monitoring of macroalgal cultivation could enable an ecosystem approach to aquaculture (EAA) in the future. To achieve this, we highlight the need for standardised and robust methods for quantifying habitat provisioning that will enable assessment and monitoring of macroalgal cultivation sites of varying scales and within different regions and environmental settings. Increased evidence for the potential habitat value of macroalgal cultivation sites will help inform and shape marine legislation, licencing and certification for macroalgal farmers and potentially reduce marine user conflicts, helping the industry to continue to grow sustainably using EAA.

27 December 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKVassilis Kitidis
Vassilis Kitidis
JSJamie D. Shutler
Jamie D. Shutler
IAIan Ashton
Ian Ashton
MWMark Warren
Mark Warren
IBIan Brown
Ian Brown
PNPhilip D. Nightingale
Philip D. Nightingale
Shelf seas play an important role in the global carbon cycle, absorbing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and exporting carbon (C) to the open ocean and sediments. The magnitude of these processes is poorly constrained, because observations are typically interpolated over multiple years. Here, we used 298500 observations of CO2 fugacity (fCO2) from a single year (2015), to estimate the net influx of atmospheric CO2 as 26.2 ± 4.7 Tg C yr−1 over the open NW European shelf. CO2 influx from the atmosphere was dominated by influx during winter as a consequence of high winds, despite a smaller, thermally-driven, air-sea fCO2 gradient compared to the larger, biologically-driven summer gradient. In order to understand this climate regulation service, we constructed a carbon-budget supplemented by data from the literature, where the NW European shelf is treated as a box with carbon entering and leaving the box. This budget showed that net C-burial was a small sink of 1.3 ± 3.1 Tg C yr−1, while CO2 efflux from estuaries to the atmosphere, removed the majority of river C-inputs. In contrast, the input from the Baltic Sea likely contributes to net export via the continental shelf pump and advection (34.4 ± 6.0 Tg C yr−1).

4 November 2019 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJamie D Shutler
Jamie D Shutler
RWRik Wanninkhof
Rik Wanninkhof
PNPhilip D Nightingale
Philip D Nightingale
DWDavid K Woolf
David K Woolf
DBDorothee Ce Bakker
Dorothee Ce Bakker
CDCraig J Donlon
Craig J Donlon
The ability to routinely quantify global carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption by the oceans has become crucial: it provides a powerful constraint for establishing global and regional carbon (C) budgets, and enables identification of the ecological impacts and risks of this uptake on the marine environment. Advances in understanding, technology, and international coordination have made it possible to measure CO2 absorption by the oceans to a greater degree of accuracy than is possible in terrestrial landscapes. These advances, combined with new satellite‐based Earth observation capabilities, increasing public availability of data, and cloud computing, provide important opportunities for addressing critical knowledge gaps. Furthermore, Earth observation in synergy with in‐situ monitoring can provide the large‐scale ocean monitoring that is necessary to support policies to protect ocean ecosystems at risk, and motivate societal shifts toward meeting C emissions targets; however, sustained effort will be needed.