Francesco Longo

Dr. Francesco Longo

Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital IRCCS
+1
orcid
Director of Maxillo-faciale Department, Ospedale Antonio Ca...

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 January 2019 in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IPIacopo Panarese
Iacopo Panarese
GAGabriella Aquino
Gabriella Aquino
ARAndrea Ronchi
Andrea Ronchi
Francesco LongoFrancesco Longo
Francesco Longo
MMMarco Montella
Marco Montella
RFRenato Franco
Renato Franco
Introduction: Oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC and OPSCC) represents an increasing problem in the global public health. Indeed, squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequent malignancy in oral cavity and one of the ten most common cancers worldwide. According to the most recent GLOBOCAN estimate in Europe between 2012 and 2015, there was an overall increasing incidence and mortality for oral cancer, mostly HPV-related in the oropharyngeal region with evidence of significant differences from the prognostic and therapeutic point of view. Areas covered: Until now, the management of the patients is based on classical histologic parameters such as TNM and tumor grading, but new molecular and cell markers have been investigated to improve patients’ treatment and survival. Therefore, there is a need for new biomarkers characterizing the cancer diversity, with the consequent possibility of patient stratification for specific treatment. Expert commentary: This review aims to discuss some of the most relevant and novel genetic, epigenetic and histological prognostic biomarkers in oral cancer, highlighting the main differences between HPV-unrelated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) that may aid in stratifying prognostic subgroups and rationalizing treatment decisions.

1 November 2003 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesco LongoFrancesco Longo
Francesco Longo
PMPietro Maremonti
Pietro Maremonti
GMGiuseppe Michele Mangone
Giuseppe Michele Mangone
GMGiuseppe De Maria
Giuseppe De Maria
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano
A retrospective review of 16 cases of midline (dermoid) cysts of the floor of the mouth is presented, evaluating the different surgical approaches. Sixteen cases of patients with a diagnosis of midline cyst of the floor of the mouth, treated at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of the School of Medicine and Surgery of the "Federico II" University of Naples (Naples, Italy), were observed over a 10-year period, between 1988 and 1998; age, sex, localization, diagnostic technique, and type of treatment were evaluated. Male patients were more frequently affected, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1 (12:4 cases). Patients ranged in age from 5 to 51 years (average age, 27.8 years). The preoperative assessment was made using ultrasonography in all cases but one, computed tomography in eight cases, and magnetic resonance imaging in three cases. Regarding surgical techniques used, a transcutaneous approach was adopted for median geniohyoid cysts, an extended median glossotomy technique was used for very large median genioglossal cysts, a median glossotomy technique was used for median genioglossal cysts, and a midline incision of the oral mucosa along the lingual frenulum was used for sublingual cysts. During the postoperative course, there were no complications except for modest edema in three cases. Follow-up ranged between 24 months and 12 years; no relapses or malignant changes were observed. In the authors' experience, the intraoral approach was also effective for the treatment of large lesions and led to very good cosmetic and functional results, whereas the extraoral incision was necessary only when the cysts were under the geniohyoid muscle.

1 March 2017 in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFrancesco Perri
Francesco Perri
Francesco LongoFrancesco Longo
Francesco Longo
MGM. Giuliano
M. Giuliano
Francesco SabbatinoFrancesco Sabbatino
Francesco Sabbatino
GFG. Favia
G. Favia
SPS. Pisconti
S. Pisconti

1 February 2019 in OncoTargets and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Perri
Francesco Perri
GSG Della Vittoria Scarpati
G Della Vittoria Scarpati
FCF Caponigro
F Caponigro
FIF Ionna
F Ionna
Francesco LongoFrancesco Longo
Francesco Longo
RSR Solla
R Solla
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare disease in Western countries. Nevertheless, its incidence in China, Singapore, and other Eastern countries reaches 20 cases per 100,000 people. Being an extremely chemo- and radiosensitive disease, upfront treatment often consists in the association of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin. Unfortunately, about 20% of the patients suffer from a radioresistant disease which recurs after upfront therapy. For these patients, mainly available therapeutic options consist in systemic therapy, in particular poly-chemotherapy. In those showing a single locoregional recurrence, chemotherapy is not considered to be the preferred approach and other different strategies may be employed. Re-irradiation and surgery are strategies that are always used more often, albeit related to high risk of morbidity. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy, such as heavy ions-based re-irradiations, are experimental but very intriguing options.

14 May 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FIFranco Ionna
Franco Ionna
PBPaolo Bossi
Paolo Bossi
Agostino GuidaAgostino Guida
Agostino Guida
Andrea AlbertiAndrea Alberti
Andrea Alberti
PMPaolo Muto
Paolo Muto
FPFrancesco Perri
Francesco Perri
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a complex group of malignancies, posing several challenges to treating physicians. Most patients are diagnosed with a locally advanced disease and treated with strategies integrating surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. About 50% of these patients will experience a recurrence of disease. Recurrent/metastatic SCCHN have poor prognosis with a median survival of about 12 months despite treatments. In the last years, the strategy to manage recurrent/metastatic SCCHN has profoundly evolved. Salvage treatments (surgery or re-irradiation) are commonly employed in patients suffering from locoregional recurrences and their role has gained more and more importance in the last years. Re-irradiation, using some particularly fractionating schedules, has the dual task of reducing the tumor mass and eliciting an immune response against cancer (abscopal effect). In this review, we will analyze the main systemic and/or locoregional strategies aimed at facing the recurrent/metastatic disease, underlining the enormous importance of the multidisciplinary approach in these types of patients.

1 June 2010 in Anti-Cancer Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFrancesco Caponigro
Francesco Caponigro
Francesco LongoFrancesco Longo
Francesco Longo
FIFranco Ionna
Franco Ionna
FPFrancesco Perri
Francesco Perri
Early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (T1–2a;N0;M0) represents a small proportion of nasopharyngeal tumors. Radiotherapy alone is the current treatment approach for this tumor and the emerging role of new radiotherapy techniques will hopefully further improve the treatment outcome for these patients. The vast majority of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma is diagnosed with locally advanced disease. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy is now acknowledged as being a standard treatment option, even though it induces a considerable incidence of acute mucosal and hematologic toxicity. The issue of adding adjuvant chemotherapy is somewhat more controversial. Similarly, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before concomitant chemoradiotherapy is a matter of interest. In patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma the prognosis is generally grim, as platinum-based chemotherapy results in a 50–70% response rate and in a median survival time of 11 months. Several trials have been performed on this subset of patients with both cytotoxic and biologic agents, but the results have not been particularly encouraging thus far. Epstein–Barr virus is associated with the vast majority of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Concentrations of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA have been associated with treatment outcome in the clinic. Immunotherapy is generally well tolerated and can sometimes elicit significant immune response, which possibly induces clinical benefit in some patients.