Gabriele Weigelhofer

Dr. Gabriele Weigelhofer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 November 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMatthias Pucher
Matthias Pucher
UWUrban Wünsch
Urban Wünsch
GWGabriele Weigelhofer
Gabriele Weigelhofer
KMKathleen Murphy
Kathleen Murphy
Thomas HeinThomas Hein
Thomas Hein
Daniel GraeberDaniel Graeber
Daniel Graeber
The roles of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in microbial processes and nutrient cycles depend on its composition, which requires detailed measurements and analyses. We introduce a package for R, called staRdom (“spectroscopic analysis of DOM in R”), to analyze DOM spectroscopic data (absorbance and fluorescence), which is key to deliver fast insight into DOM composition of many samples. staRdom provides functions that standardize data preparation and analysis of spectroscopic data and are inspired by practical work. The user can perform blank subtraction, dilution correction, Raman normalization, scatter removal and interpolation, and fluorescence normalization. The software performs parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) of excitation–emission matrices (EEMs), including peak picking of EEMs, and calculates fluorescence indices, absorbance indices, and absorbance slope indices from EEMs and absorbance spectra. A comparison between PARAFAC solutions by staRdom in R compared with drEEM in MATLAB showed nearly identical solutions for most datasets, although different convergence criteria are needed to obtain similar results and interpolation of missing data is important when working with staRdom. In conclusion, staRdom offers the opportunity for standardized multivariate decomposition of spectroscopic data without requiring software licensing fees and presuming only basic R knowledge.

1 February 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Thomas HeinThomas Hein
Thomas Hein
USUlrich Schwarz
Ulrich Schwarz
Helmut HabersackHelmut Habersack
Helmut Habersack
INIulian Nichersu
Iulian Nichersu
SPStefan Preiner
Stefan Preiner
GWGabriele Weigelhofer
Gabriele Weigelhofer

1 August 2012 in Oecologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSStefanie Schabhüttl
Stefanie Schabhüttl
PHPeter Hingsamer
Peter Hingsamer
GWGabriele Weigelhofer
Gabriele Weigelhofer
Thomas HeinThomas Hein
Thomas Hein
AWAchim Weigert
Achim Weigert
MSMaren Striebel
Maren Striebel
Phytoplankton play an important role as primary producers and thus can affect higher trophic levels. Phytoplankton growth and diversity may, besides other factors, be controlled by seasonal temperature changes and increasing water temperatures. In this study, we investigated the combined effects of temperature and diversity on phytoplankton growth. In a controlled laboratory experiment, monocultures of 15 freshwater phytoplankton taxa (green algae, cyanobacteria, and diatoms) as well as 25 mixed communities of different species richness (2–12 species) and taxa composition were exposed to constant temperatures of 12, 18, and 24 °C. Additionally, they were exposed to short-term daily temperature peaks of +4 °C. Increased species richness had a positive effect on phytoplankton growth rates and phosphorous content at all temperature levels, with maximum values occurring at 18 °C. Overyielding was observed at almost all temperature levels and could mostly be explained by complementary traits. Higher temperatures resulted in higher fractions of cyanobacteria in communities. This negative effect of temperature on phytoplankton diversity following a shift in community composition was most obvious in communities adapted to cooler temperatures, pointing to the assumption that relative temperature changes may be more important than absolute ones.

1 January 2022 in Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAlexander Eder
Alexander Eder
GWGabriele Weigelhofer
Gabriele Weigelhofer
MPMatthias Pucher
Matthias Pucher
ATAlexandra Tiefenbacher
Alexandra Tiefenbacher
PSPeter Strauss
Peter Strauss
Günter BlöschlGünter Blöschl
Günter Blöschl

1 January 2019 in Earth-Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMaría Isabel Arce
María Isabel Arce
CMClara Mendoza-Lera
Clara Mendoza-Lera
MAMaría Almagro
María Almagro
Núria CatalánNúria Catalán
Núria Catalán
ARAnna M. Romaní
Anna M. Romaní
Daniel von SchillerDaniel von Schiller
Daniel von Schiller

25 January 2018 in River Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thomas HeinThomas Hein
Thomas Hein
AFAndrea Funk
Andrea Funk
FPF. Pletterbauer
F. Pletterbauer
WGW. Graf
W. Graf
IZI. Zsuffa
I. Zsuffa
GWGabriele Weigelhofer
Gabriele Weigelhofer
For centuries, rivers have experienced massive changes of their hydromorphic structures due to human activities. The Danube River, the second largest river in Europe, is a case in point for long‐term societal imprint. Resulting human‐induced pressures are a key issue for river management, aiming to improve the ecological conditions and guarantee the provision of ecosystem services. As the most international river basin in the world, the management of the Danube is particularly challenging and needs a well‐organized cooperation of 19 nations. The recent river basin management plan has identified pollution and hydromorphological alterations as most pressing problems, but it has also acknowledged newly emerging issues. In this article, we present 3 specific examples of highly relevant issues for the future river basin management of the Danube: (a) long‐term impacts in the catchment such as changes in flood patterns and potential ecological consequences; (b) complex feedback loops linking the spread of neozoa with intertwined stressor responses due to river engineering for different purposes; and (c) linkages between different assessment approaches based on European legal frameworks to analyse the specific pressures at different spatial scales. These examples highlight the need for a more integrated approach in future Danube River Basin management schemes. Furthermore, large‐scale effects such as climate change and interactions of multiple pressures need to be addressed in future management to increase resilience of the river system and to allow a sustainable ecosystem‐based management of rivers.