Adam Cobb

Dr. Adam Cobb

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAdam Cobb
Adam Cobb
GWGail W.T. Wilson
Gail W.T. Wilson
CGCarla L. Goad
Carla L. Goad
SBScott R. Bean
Scott R. Bean
RKRhett C. Kaufman
Rhett C. Kaufman
JWJeff D. Wilson
Jeff D. Wilson

6 January 2019 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JZJiqiong Zhou
Jiqiong Zhou
GWGail W.T. Wilson
Gail W.T. Wilson
ACAdam Cobb
Adam Cobb
GYGaowen Yang
Gaowen Yang
YZYingJun Zhang
YingJun Zhang

2 July 2018 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXin Yang
Xin Yang
YSYue Shen
Yue Shen
NLNan Liu
Nan Liu
GWGail W. T. Wilson
Gail W. T. Wilson
ACAdam Cobb
Adam Cobb
YZYingJun Zhang
YingJun Zhang
Overgrazing substantially contributes to global grassland degradation by decreasing plant community productivity and diversity through trampling, defoliation, and removal of nutrients. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi also play a critical role in plant community diversity, composition, and primary productivity, maintaining ecosystem functions. However, interactions between grazing disturbances, such as trampling and defoliation, and AM fungi in grassland communities are not well known. We examined influences of trampling, defoliation, and AM fungi on semiarid grassland plant community composition for 3 yr, by comparing all combinations of these factors. Benomyl fungicide was applied to reduce AM fungal abundance. Overgrazing typically resulted in reduced dominance of Stipa Krylovii, contributing to degradation of typical steppe grasslands. Our results indicated trampling generally had little effect on plant community composition, unless combined with defoliation or AM fungal suppression. Defoliation was the main component of grazing that promoted dominance of Potentilla acaulis over Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida, presumably by alleviating light limitation. In non‐defoliated plots, AM fungi promoted A. frigida, with a concomitant reduction in S. krylovii growth compared to corresponding AM suppressed plots. Our results indicate AM fungi and defoliation jointly suppress S. krylovii biomass; however, prolonged defoliation weakens mycorrhizal influence on plant community composition. These findings give new insight into dominant plant species shifts in degraded semiarid grasslands.

24 November 2021 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPShishir Paudel
Shishir Paudel
ACAdam Cobb
Adam Cobb
EBElizabeth Boughton
Elizabeth Boughton
SSSheri Spiegal
Sheri Spiegal
RBRaoul K. Boughton
Raoul K. Boughton
Jean SteinerJean Steiner
Jean Steiner
Increasing demand for agricultural products is driving grassland management intensification with subsequent impacts on ecosystem services and disservices. Key questions related to grassland production as well as environmental and social concerns must be addressed to ensure sustainability. We propose a unified perspective, addressing numerous trade‐offs and synergies between grassland ecosystem services and disservices, and considering an array of ecological and human consequences associated with history and ongoing shifts in management strategies. Much of our discussion utilizes evidence from humid grasslands; however, our examples and recommendations have global implications for the future of grassland management. We characterize four categories of ecosystem services and disservices (provisioning, supporting, regulating, and cultural) provided by perennial grasslands that are extensively managed (low or no input, never cultivated) or intensively managed (high‐input, cultivated). We explore a range of potential outcomes following transition from extensive to intensive agroecosystems around the globe. Additionally, we suggest specific research priorities to better evaluate ecosystem services and disservices across management intensities. Finally, we highlight potential benefits of landscape mosaics that include grasslands across a continuum of extensive to intensive strategies.

23 August 2018 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WGWeiyang Gui
Weiyang Gui
HRHaiyan Ren
Haiyan Ren
NLNan Liu
Nan Liu
YZYingJun Zhang
YingJun Zhang
ACAdam Cobb
Adam Cobb
GYGaowen Yang
Gaowen Yang

31 August 2022 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EDEric B. Duell
Eric B. Duell
ACAdam Cobb
Adam Cobb
GWGail W. Wilson
Gail W. Wilson
There has been a surge in industries built on the production of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal-based inoculants in the past few decades. This is not surprising, given the positive effects of AM fungi on plant growth and nutritional status. However, there is growing concern regarding the quality and efficacy of commercial inoculants. To assess the potential benefits and negative consequences of commercial AM fungal inoculants in grasslands, we conducted a controlled growth chamber study assessing the productivity and AM fungal root colonization of nine grassland plant species grown in grassland soil with or without one of six commercial AM fungal products. Our research showed no evidence of benefit; commercial inoculants never increased native plant biomass, although several inoculants decreased the growth of native species and increased the growth of invasive plant species. In addition, two commercial products contained excessive levels of phosphorus or nitrogen and consistently reduced AM fungal root colonization, indicating an unintentional de-coupling of the symbiosis. As there is little knowledge of the ecological consequences of inoculation with commercial AM fungal products, it is critical for restoration practitioners, scientists, and native plant growers to assess the presence of local AM fungal communities before investing in unnecessary, or possibly detrimental, AM fungal products.