Improving the energy efficiency of existing buildings by implementing building automation control strategies (BACS) besides building envelope and energy system retrofitting has been recommended by the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) 2018. This paper investigated this recommendation by conducting a simulation-based optimization to explore cost-effective retrofitting combinations of building envelope, energy systems and BACS measures in-line with automation standard EN 15232. Two cases (i.e., a typical single-family house and apartment block) were modeled and simulated using IDA Indoor Climate and Energy (IDA-ICE). The built-in optimization tool, GenOpt, was used to minimize energy consumption as the single objective function. The associated difference in life cycle cost, compared to the reference design, was calculated for each optimization iteration. Thermal comfort of the optimized solutions was assessed to verify the thermal comfort acceptability. Installing an air source heat pump had a greater energy-saving potential than reducing heat losses through the building envelope. Implementing BACS achieved cost-effective energy savings up to 24%. Energy savings up to 57% were estimated when BACS was combined with the other retrofitting measures. Particularly for compact buildings, where the potential of reducing heat losses through the envelope is limited, the impact of BACS increased. BACS also improved the thermal comfort.

In this study, the energy savings and cost-effectiveness of building automation measures in a retrofitting context are evaluated for a Norwegian single-family house. In addition, two methods for calculating savings from implementing building automation control systems (BACS) are compared: energy performance simulation and the BACS factor method proposed in EN 15232. Four retrofitting packages and four automation levels are combined to create 16 model versions. This study shows that BACS can increase energy savings and improve indoor comfort when implemented as a retrofitting measure. However, the relative impact on energy savings of building automation decreases when the delivered energy is lower. In addition, the impact of building automation on the energy savings is low compared to the effect of retrofitting the building envelope. When only BACS are implemented, savings up to 21% can be achieved, but when an integrated solution is implemented savings up to 60% can be achieved. Finally, some directions for future work are suggested.

Using firewood as a space heating source is a popular solution in Norwegian housing and can significantly reduce the electrical energy demand of houses. This study analysed habits and reasons for using a wood stove from survey data. From this, typical behaviour patterns were defined. These patterns were imported into a building performance simulation model of a typical Norwegian single-family detached house to evaluate the impact of the stove user behaviour on the electrical energy demand and on the overheating risk. Results showed that up to 32% of the electrical energy demand for space heating can be saved using a wood stove. The number of overheating hours increased when the wood stove was used more frequently. However, it decreased after full renovation because the stove is used less often, as the total space heating demand decreases and the indoor temperature drops less often below the temperature set-point when the stove is started. Active use of the wood stove is effective as retrofitting measure when the aim is to save electricity or fossil fuels. Nevertheless, if the stove power is not adapted to the building, it can be challenging to maintain a comfortable temperature in the room.