Eliza Kulbat

Dr. Eliza Kulbat

Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 11/12 Narutowicza st., 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSylwia Fudala-Ksiazek
Sylwia Fudala-Ksiazek
Mattia PierpaoliMattia Pierpaoli
Mattia Pierpaoli
EKEliza Kulbat
Eliza Kulbat
ALAneta Luczkiewicz
Aneta Luczkiewicz

19 August 2019 in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEliza Kulbat
Eliza Kulbat
ASAleksandra Sokołowska
Aleksandra Sokołowska
The concentrations of six metals (Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cr, and Cd) were investigated in bottom sediments of Straszyn Lake (North Poland). This study was designed to determine a total content of metals and to assess their mobility and bioavailability. The sequential extraction was used to fractionate metals into five fractions: exchangeable, bound to carbonates, bound to Fe–Mn oxides, bound to organic matter, and residual. The evaluation of sediments contamination degree by metals was performed by applying the geochemical quality guidelines, the pollution load index, and the geo-accumulation index (Igeo). The assessment based on these methods demonstrated that sediments were polluted with Cr and the sediments quality guidelines confirmed these results. Moreover, the average concentrations of Cu, Ni, and Cr were respectively 3.4, 3.9, and 21.2 times higher than their background values. According to ecological risk index and risk assessment code Cd was the most important factor affecting the ecological environment of the Straszyn Lake. The metal speciation analysis demonstrated that the mean percentage of metals in the exchangeable and carbonate fractions decreased in the following order: Cd (59.1%) > Zn (19.8%) = Ni (19.8%) > Pb (16.6%) > Cu (3.3%) > Cr (2.7%). The very strong correlation calculated between all the metals indicated their common origin.

20 March 2021 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRafał Bray
Rafał Bray
KJKatarzyna Jankowska
Katarzyna Jankowska
EKEliza Kulbat
Eliza Kulbat
ALAneta Luczkiewicz
Aneta Luczkiewicz
ASAleksandra Sokołowska
Aleksandra Sokołowska
The paper presents the results of research on the use of ultrafiltration, using membranes of 200 and 400 kDa separation, for disinfection of municipal treated wastewater. The research was conducted on a fractional technical scale using real municipal treated wastewater from two large wastewater treatment plants treating most of the wastewater over the one-million polycentric Gdańsk agglomeration (1.2 million inhabitants). UF 200 kDa and UF 400 kDa processes enabled further improvement of the physical and chemical parameters of treated wastewater. Total phosphorus (to below 0.2 mg/L–UF 200 kDa, 0.13 mg/L–UF 400 kDa) and turbid substances (to below 0.2 mg/L, both membranes) were removed in the highest degree. COD was reduced efficiently (to below 25.6 mgO2/L–UF 200 kDa, 26.8 mgO2/L–UF 400 kDa), while total nitrogen was removed to a small extent (to 7.12 mg/L–UF 200 kDa and 5.7 mg/L–UF 400 kDa. Based on the reduction of indicator bacteria; fecal coliforms including E. coli (FC) and fecal enterococci (FE) it was found that the ultrafiltration is an effective method of disinfection. Not much indicator bacterial were observed in the permeate after processes (UF 200 kDa; FC—5 CFU/L; FE—1 CFU/L and UF 400 kDa; FC—70 CFU/L; FE—10 CFU/L. However, microscopic analysis of prokaryotic cells and virus particles showed their presence after the application of both membrane types; TCN 3.0 × 102 cells/mL–UF 200 kDa, 5.0 × 103 cells/mL–UF 400 kDa, VP 1.0 × 105/mL. The presence of potentially pathogenic, highly infectious virus particles means that ultrafiltration cannot be considered a sufficient disinfection method for treated wastewater diverted for reuse or discharged from high load wastewater treatment plants to recreational areas. For full microbiological safety it would be advisable to apply an additional disinfection method (e.g., ozonation).

1 December 2011 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAneta Luczkiewicz
Aneta Luczkiewicz
KJKatarzyna Jankowska
Katarzyna Jankowska
RBR. Bray
R. Bray
EKEliza Kulbat
Eliza Kulbat
BQB. Quant
B. Quant
KOK. Olanczuk-Neyman
K. Olanczuk-Neyman
The main objective of the study was to assess the potential of three systems (UV irradiation, ozonation, and micro/ultrafiltration) operated in a pilot scale in removal of antimicrobial-resistant fecal bacteria from secondary effluent of the local wastewater treatment plant (700,000 population equivalent). The effectiveness of the processes was analysed using the removal ratio of fecal indicators (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp.). The susceptibility of fecal indicators to antimicrobial agents important in human therapy was examined. Resistance to nitrofurantoin and erythromycin was common among enterococci and followed by resistance to fluoroquinolones and tetracycline. Resistance to high-level aminoglycosides and glycopeptides was also observed. E. coli isolates were most frequently resistant to penicillins and tetracycline. The extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli was detected once, after ozonation. Substantial attention should be paid to the E. coli and enterococci resistant to three or more chemical classes of antimicrobials (MAR), which in general constituted up to 15 and 49% of the tested isolates, respectively. Although the applied methods were effective in elimination of fecal indicators (removal efficiency up to 99.99%), special attention has to be paid to the application of sufficient disinfection and operation conditions to avoid selection of antimicrobial resistant bacteria.

3 May 2017 in Environmental Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSylwia Fudala-Ksiazek
Sylwia Fudala-Ksiazek
EKEliza Kulbat
Eliza Kulbat
ALAneta Luczkiewicz
Aneta Luczkiewicz
This study focuses on the possible use and efficacy of the co-treatment of landfill leachate (intermediate-age) with municipal wastewater. The nitrification, denitrification, and dephosphatation capability of activated sludge acclimated with a mixture of raw municipal wastewater (RWW) with gradually increasing amounts of raw landfill leachate (RLL) (from 0.5 to 5% v/v) were tested. Biochemical tests were conducted simultaneously in batch reactors (BRs). According to the obtained data, the ammonia utilization rate (AUR) was 3.68 g N/(kg volatile suspended solids (VSS)·h) for RWW, and it increased to 5.78 g N/(kg VSS·h) with the addition of 5% RLL. The nitrate utilization rate under anoxic conditions (NURAX) remained at a comparable level of 1.55–1.98 g N/(kg VSS·h). During the anoxic phase, both nitrate utilization and phosphorus uptake occurred, suggesting that denitrifying phosphorus-accumulating organisms (DPAOs) utilized N–NO3. With the addition of RLL, the rates of anoxic and aerobic phosphate uptake (PURAX and PURAE) and phosphate release rate (PRR) decreased. The PRR was likely negatively influenced by high N–NO3 concentrations but not completely inhibited due to the availability of a biodegradable fraction of chemical oxygen demand (COD). Thus, monitoring the NH4–N load in wastewater treatment plant influent before co-treatment is more informative than that using hydraulic-based criteria. Abbreviations: σ – standard deviation; AUR – ammonia utilization rate; DPAO – denitrifying phosphorus-accumulating organisms; MLVSS – mixed liquor volatile suspended solids content; MSW – municipal solid waste; NURAE – nitrate production rate under aerobic conditions; NURAX – nitrate utilization rate under anoxic conditions; PAO – phosphorus-accumulating organisms; PRR – phosphate release rate under anaerobic conditions; PURAX – phosphate uptake rate under anoxic conditions; PURAE – phosphate uptake rate under aerobic conditions; RLL – raw landfill leachates; RM0.5 – raw mixture of RWW with 0.5% (vol.) of RLL; RM3 – raw mixture of RWW with 3% (vol.) of RLL; RM5 – raw mixture of RWW with 5% (vol.) of RLL; RWW – wastewater; VFA – volatile fatty acids; WWTP – wastewater treatment plant

1 November 2011 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jacek MakiniaJacek Makinia
Jacek Makinia
KCKrzysztof Czerwionka
Krzysztof Czerwionka
JOJ. Oleszkiewicz
J. Oleszkiewicz
EKEliza Kulbat
Eliza Kulbat
SFSylwia Fudala-Ksiazek
Sylwia Fudala-Ksiazek
The use of fusel oil as an 'alternative' carbon source for denitrification in the mainstream and sidestream treatment processes was studied. Research comprised two kinds of batch experiments as well as acclimation of process biomass to external carbon sources. In the conventional nitrate utilization rate (NUR) measurements (one-phase experiments with non-acclimated biomass), the NUR with fusel oil was 1.4-1.7 g N/(kg VSS.h which was comparable to NUR with ethanol and with slowly biodegradable fraction of the settled wastewater. When fusel oil was added at the beginning of the anoxic phase, preceded by an anaerobic phase (in two-phase experiments with non-acclimated biomass), the NURs of 2.5-2.9 g N/(kg VSS.h) were comparable to the tests without the addition of any external carbon sources. The addition of fusel oil and ethanol resulted in a significant enhancement of the denitrification efficiency in lab-scale sequencing batch reactors treating sludge reject water. The NURs continuously increased from below 1 g N/(kg VSS.h) to over 10 g N/(kg VSS.h) over the entire 4-week operational period, indicating gradual acclimation to the substrate. The overall total N removal efficiency reached similar to 90%.