Emilia Scalona

Dr. Emilia Scalona

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 January 2021 in Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANArturo Nuara
Arturo Nuara
MFMaddalena Fabbri-Destro
Maddalena Fabbri-Destro
ESEmilia Scalona
Emilia Scalona
SLStefano Elio Lenzi
Stefano Elio Lenzi
GRGiacomo Rizzolatti
Giacomo Rizzolatti
PAPietro Avanzini
Pietro Avanzini

23 September 2015 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juri TaborriJuri Taborri
Juri Taborri
ESEmilia Scalona
Emilia Scalona
Eduardo PalermoEduardo Palermo
Eduardo Palermo
Stefano RossiStefano Rossi
Stefano Rossi
PCPaolo Cappa
Paolo Cappa
Gait-phase recognition is a necessary functionality to drive robotic rehabilitation devices for lower limbs. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) represent a viable solution, but they need subject-specific training, making data processing very time-consuming. Here, we validated an inter-subject procedure to avoid the intra-subject one in two, four and six gait-phase models in pediatric subjects. The inter-subject procedure consists in the identification of a standardized parameter set to adapt the model to measurements. We tested the inter-subject procedure both on scalar and distributed classifiers. Ten healthy children and ten hemiplegic children, each equipped with two Inertial Measurement Units placed on shank and foot, were recruited. The sagittal component of angular velocity was recorded by gyroscopes while subjects performed four walking trials on a treadmill. The goodness of classifiers was evaluated with the Receiver Operating Characteristic. The results provided a goodness from good to optimum for all examined classifiers (0 < G < 0.6), with the best performance for the distributed classifier in two-phase recognition (G = 0.02). Differences were found among gait partitioning models, while no differences were found between training procedures with the exception of the shank classifier. Our results raise the possibility of avoiding subject-specific training in HMM for gait-phase recognition and its implementation to control exoskeletons for the pediatric population.

24 March 2022 in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMaria Chiara Bazzini
Maria Chiara Bazzini
ANArturo Nuara
Arturo Nuara
ESEmilia Scalona
Emilia Scalona
DMDoriana De Marco
Doriana De Marco
GRGiacomo Rizzolatti
Giacomo Rizzolatti
MFMaddalena Fabbri-Destro
Maddalena Fabbri-Destro
Motor learning can be defined as a process that leads to relatively permanent changes in motor behavior through repeated interactions with the environment. Different strategies can be adopted to achieve motor learning: movements can be overtly practiced leading to an amelioration of motor performance; alternatively, covert strategies (e.g., action observation) can promote neuroplastic changes in the motor system even in the absence of real movement execution. However, whether a training regularly alternating action observation and execution (i.e., Action Observation Training, AOT) may surpass the pure motor practice (MP) and observational learning (OL) remains to be established. To address this issue, we enrolled 54 subjects requiring them to learn tying nautical knots via one out of three types of training (AOT, MP, OL) with the scope to investigate which element mostly contributes to motor learning. We evaluated the overall improvement of each group, along with the predictive role that neuropsychological indexes exert on each treatment outcome. The AOT group exhibited the highest performance improvement (42%), indicating that the regular alternation between observation and execution biases participants toward a better performance. The reiteration of this sequence provides an incremental, adjunct value that super-adds onto the efficacy of motor practice or observational learning in isolation (42% > 25% + 10%, i.e., OL + MP). These findings extend the use of the AOT from clinical and rehabilitative contexts to daily routines requiring the learning and perfectioning of new motor skills such as sports training, music, and occupational activities requiring fine motor control.

1 May 2015
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
Juri TaborriJuri Taborri
Juri Taborri
ESEmilia Scalona
Emilia Scalona
Stefano RossiStefano Rossi
Stefano Rossi
Eduardo PalermoEduardo Palermo
Eduardo Palermo
FPFabrizio Patane
Fabrizio Patane
PCPaolo Cappa
Paolo Cappa
In this paper we present and validate a methodology to avoid the training procedure of a classifier based on an Hidden Markov Model (HMM) for a real-time gait recognition of two or four phases, implemented to control pediatric active orthoses of lower limb. The new methodology consists in the identification of a set of standardized parameters, obtained by a data set of angular velocities of healthy subjects age-matched. Sagittal angular velocities of lower limbs of ten typically developed children (TD) and ten children with hemiplegia (HC) were acquired by means of the tri-axial gyroscope embedded into Magnetic Inertial Measurement Units (MIMU). The actual sequence of gait phases was captured through a set of four foot switches. The experimental protocol consists in two walking tasks on a treadmill set at 1.0 and 1.5 km/h. We used the Goodness (G) as parameter, computed from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) space, to compare the results obtained by the new methodology with the ones obtained by the subject-specific training of HMM via the Baum-Welch Algorithm. Paired-sample t-tests have shown no significant statistically differences between the two procedures when the gait phase detection was performed with the gyroscopes placed on the foot. Conversely, significant differences were found in data gathered by means of gyroscopes placed on shank. Actually, data relative to both groups presented G values in the range of good/optimum classifier (i.e. G ≤ 0.3), with better performance for the two-phase classifier model. In conclusion, the novel methodology here proposed guarantees the possibility to omit the off-line subject-specific training procedure for gait phase detection and it can be easily implemented in the control algorithm of active orthoses.

13 February 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDoriana De Marco
Doriana De Marco
ESEmilia Scalona
Emilia Scalona
MBMaria Chiara Bazzini
Maria Chiara Bazzini
PAPietro Avanzini
Pietro Avanzini
MFMaddalena Fabbri-Destro
Maddalena Fabbri-Destro
It is well known that the kinematics of an action is modulated by the underlying motor intention. In turn, kinematics serves as a cue also during action observation, providing hints about the intention of the observed action. However, an open question is whether decoding others’ intentions on the basis of their kinematics depends solely on how much the kinematics varies across different actions, or rather it is also influenced by its similarity with the observer motor repertoire. The execution of reach-to-grasp and place actions, differing for target size and context, was recorded in terms of upper-limb kinematics in 21 volunteers and in an actor. Volunteers had later to observe the sole reach-to-grasp phase of the actor’s actions, and predict the underlying intention. The potential benefit of the kinematic actor-participant similarity for recognition accuracy was evaluated. In execution, both target size and context modulated specific kinematic parameters. More importantly, although participants performed above chance in intention recognition, the similarity of motor patterns positively correlated with recognition accuracy. Overall, these data indicate that kinematic similarity exerts a facilitative role in intention recognition, providing further support to the view of action intention recognition as a visuo-motor process grounded in motor resonance.

16 March 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Riccardo MonfriniRiccardo Monfrini
Riccardo Monfrini
Gianluca RossettoGianluca Rossetto
Gianluca Rossetto
ESEmilia Scalona
Emilia Scalona
MGManuela Galli
Manuela Galli
Veronica CimolinVeronica Cimolin
Veronica Cimolin
Nicola Francesco LopomoNicola Francesco Lopomo
Nicola Francesco Lopomo
Obesity has a critical impact on musculoskeletal systems, and excessive weight directly affects the ability of subjects to realize movements. It is important to monitor the activities of obese subjects, their functional limitations, and the overall risks related to specific motor tasks. From this perspective, this systematic review identified and summarized the main technologies specifically used to acquire and quantify movements in scientific studies involving obese subjects. The search for articles was carried out on electronic databases, i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included observational studies performed on adult obese subjects whenever reporting quantitative information concerning their movement. The articles must have been written in English, published after 2010, and concerned subjects who were primarily diagnosed with obesity, thus excluding confounding diseases. Marker-based optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric systems resulted to be the most adopted solution for movement analysis focused on obesity; indeed, wearable technologies based on magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) were recently adopted for analyzing obese subjects. Further, these systems are usually integrated with force platforms, so as to have information about the ground reaction forces. However, few studies specifically reported the reliability and limitations of these approaches due to soft tissue artifacts and crosstalk, which turned out to be the most relevant problems to deal with in this context. In this perspective, in spite of their inherent limitations, medical imaging techniques—such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and biplane radiography—should be used to improve the accuracy of biomechanical evaluations in obese people, and to systematically validate less-invasive approaches.