Andrea Cafarelli

Dr. Andrea Cafarelli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2017 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrea CafarelliAndrea Cafarelli
Andrea Cafarelli
AVA. Verbeni
A. Verbeni
APA. Poliziani
A. Poliziani
PDP. Dario
P. Dario
AMA. Menciassi
A. Menciassi
LRLeonardo Ricotti
Leonardo Ricotti

21 April 2016 in Journal of Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andrea CafarelliAndrea Cafarelli
Andrea Cafarelli
PMP. Miloro
P. Miloro
AVA. Verbeni
A. Verbeni
MCMarina Carbone
Marina Carbone
AMA. Menciassi
A. Menciassi

1 March 2023 in APL Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FIFrancesco Iacoponi
Francesco Iacoponi
Andrea CafarelliAndrea Cafarelli
Andrea Cafarelli
FFFrancesco Fontana
Francesco Fontana
TPTiziano Pratellesi
Tiziano Pratellesi
EDErik Dumont
Erik Dumont
LRLeonardo Ricotti
Leonardo Ricotti
In this paper, we stimulated M1-like macrophages (obtained from U937 cells) with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) to lower pro-inflammatory cytokine production. A systematic screening of different frequencies, intensities, duty cycles, and exposure times was performed. The optimal stimulation conditions leading to a marked decrease in the release of inflammatory cytokines were determined to be 38 kHz, 250 mW/cm2, 20%, and 90 min, respectively. Using these parameters, we verified that up to 72 h LIPUS did not affect cell viability, resulting in an increase in metabolic activity and in a reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Moreover, we found that two mechanosensitive ion channels (PIEZO1 and TRPV1) were involved in the LIPUS-mediated cytokine release modulation. We also assessed the role of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway and observed an enhancement of actin polymerization. Finally, transcriptomic data suggested that the bioeffects of LIPUS treatment occur through the modulation of p38 MAPK signaling pathway.

1 July 2017 in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAlice Rita Salgarella
Alice Rita Salgarella
Andrea CafarelliAndrea Cafarelli
Andrea Cafarelli
LRLeonardo Ricotti
Leonardo Ricotti
Lorenzo CapineriLorenzo Capineri
Lorenzo Capineri
PDPaolo Dario
Paolo Dario
Arianna MenciassiArianna Menciassi
Arianna Menciassi

21 August 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VDValerio D'Agostino
Valerio D'Agostino
ASAngela Sorriento
Angela Sorriento
Andrea CafarelliAndrea Cafarelli
Andrea Cafarelli
DDDanilo Donati
Danilo Donati
NPNicolas Papalexis
Nicolas Papalexis
Paolo SpinnatoPaolo Spinnato
Paolo Spinnato
While conventional radiography and MRI have a well-established role in the assessment of patients with knee osteoarthritis, ultrasound is considered a complementary and additional tool. Moreover, the actual usefulness of ultrasound is still a matter of debate in knee osteoarthritis assessment. Despite that, ultrasound offers several advantages and interesting aspects for both current clinical practice and future perspectives. Ultrasound is potentially a helpful tool in the detection of anomalies such as cartilage degradation, osteophytes, and synovitis in cases of knee osteoarthritis. Furthermore, local diagnostic and minimally invasive therapeutic operations pertaining to knee osteoarthritis can be safely guided by real-time ultrasound imaging. We are constantly observing a growing knowledge and awareness among radiologists and other physicians, concerning ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound studies can be extremely useful to track the response to various therapies. For this specific aim, tele-ultrasonography may constitute an easy tool aiding precise and repeated follow-up controls. Moreover, raw radio-frequency data from US backscattering signals contain more information than B-mode imaging. This paves the way for quantitative in-depth analyses of cartilage, bone, and other articular structures. Overall, ultrasound technologies and their rapid evolution have the potential to make a difference at both the research and clinical levels. This narrative review article describes the potential of such technologies and their possible future implications.

1 September 2021 in Ultrasonics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FFF. Fontana
F. Fontana
FIF. Iberite
F. Iberite
Andrea CafarelliAndrea Cafarelli
Andrea Cafarelli
AAA. Aliperta
A. Aliperta
GBG. Baldi
G. Baldi
LRLeonardo Ricotti
Leonardo Ricotti
This work aims to describe the development and validation of two low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation systems able to control the dose delivered to the biological target. Transducer characterization was performed in terms of pressure field shape and intensity, for a high-frequency range (500 kHz to 5 MHz) and for a low-frequency value (38 kHz). This allowed defining the distance, on the beam axis, at which biological samples should be placed during stimulation and to exactly know the intensity at the target. Carefully designed retaining systems were developed, for hosting biological samples. Sealing tests proved their impermeability to external contaminants. The assembly/de-assembly time of the systems resulted ~3 min. Time-domain acoustic simulations allowed to precisely estimate the ultrasound beam within the biological sample chamber, thus enabling the possibility to precisely control the pressure to be transmitted to the biological target, by modulating the transducer's input voltage. Biological in vitro tests were also carried out, demonstrating the sterility of the system and the absence of toxic and inflammatory effects on growing cells after multiple immersions in water, over seven days.