The devastating Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai underwater volcano erupted at ~04:15 UT on 15 January 2022. We captured the waves that erupted from the volcano propagating in the ionosphere by monitoring total electron content (TEC) perturbations utilizing ground-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers that receive electromagnetic signals transmitted from the geostationary satellites operated by the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS). Meanwhile, ground barometers detected unusual enhancements of air pressure traveling in the troposphere. A novel phenomenon shows that the waves can individually propagate with a speed of ~335 m/s in the ionosphere, which is faster than its’ ~305 m/s in the troposphere. We further examined multiple geophysical data at the particular site of the novel instrumental array. Analytical results show that the pressure enhancements traveling in the troposphere not only downward trigger ground vibrations mainly in the horizontal components without obvious time difference, but also upward, leading the secondary TEC perturbations with a ~12-min delay.
The coseismic electromagnetic signals observed during the 2004 Mw 6 Parkfield earthquake are simulated using electrokinetic theory. By using a finite fault source model obtained via kinematic inversion, we calculate the electric and magnetic responses to the earthquake rupture. The result shows that the synthetic electric signals agree with the observed data for both amplitude and wave shape, especially for early portions of the records (first 9 s) after the earthquake, supporting the electrokinetic effect as the reasonable mechanism for the generation of the coseismic electric fields. More work is needed to explain the magnetic fields and the later portions of the electric fields. Analysis shows that the coseismic electromagnetic (EM) signals are sensitive to both the material properties at the location of the EM sensors and the electrochemical heterogeneity in the vicinity of the EM sensors and can be used to characterize the underground electrochemical properties.
24 October 2017 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Broadband seismometers, ground-based Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), and magnetometers that were located within an epicentral distance of approximately 150 km consistently observed the novel anomalous behaviors of the common-mode ground vibrations approximately 5–10 days before the M6.6 Meinong earthquake in Taiwan. The common-mode ground vibrations with amplitudes near 0.1 m at frequencies ranging from 8 × 10−5 to 2 × 10−4 Hz were generated near the region close to the epicenter of the impending earthquake. The common-mode vibrations were consistently observed in seismic and GNSS data associated with five other earthquakes in four distinct areas. The results reveal that the common-mode vibrations could be a typical behavior before earthquakes. The causal mechanism of common-mode vibrations can be attributed to crustal resonance excitations before fault dislocations occur. Potential relationships with other pre-earthquake anomalies suggest that the common-mode vibrations could be ground motion before earthquakes, which was investigated for a significant length of time.
27 August 2020 in Geophysical Journal International
Very clear coseismic electric and magnetic signals accompanying seismic waves were observed during the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, which took place in western China. In order to understand the generation mechanism of these observed signals, we simulate electric and magnetic responses to this specific earthquake based on three mechanisms, namely, the electrokinetic effect, the motional induction effect and the rotation effect of the coil-type magnetometer. We conduct the simulations using a point source model and a realistic layered earth model and compare to the observed data in the frequency band 0.05–0.3 Hz. Our results show that the electrokinetic effect can explain the observed electric fields in both waveform and amplitude, but it cannot explain the magnetic signals accompanying the Rayleigh wave. The motional induction effect cannot explain either the coseismic electric or magnetic data because it predicts much weaker coseismic electric and magnetic fields than the observed data. The magnetic fields resulting from the rotation of the magnetometer agree with the observed data in the waveforms though their amplitudes are two to four times smaller than the observed data. Our simulations suggest that the electrokinetic effect is responsible for the generation of coseismic electric fields and that rotation of the coil magnetometer is likely the main cause of coseismic magnetic fields. The results improve our interpretation of the coseismic electromagnetic (EM) phenomenon and are useful for understanding other kinds of earthquake-associated EM phenomena.