Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel, non-thermal energy source to selectively ablate cardiac tissue. We describe a multicentre experience on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) via the pentaspline Farapulse™ PFA system vs. thermal-based technologies in a propensity score-matched population of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients. Propensity score matching was adopted to compare PVI-only ablation outcomes via the Farawave™ system (Group PFA), cryoballoon (Group CRYO), or focal radiofrequency (Group RF) (PFA:CRYO:RF ratio = 1:2:2). Among 1572 (mean age: 62.4 ± 11.3 years; 42.5% females) PAF patients undergoing first time PVI with either PFA (n = 174), CRYO (n = 655), or RF (n = 743), propensity score matching yielded 174 PFA, 348 CRYO, and 348 RF patients. First-pass isolation was achieved in 98.8% of pulmonary veins (PVs) with PFA, 81.5% with CRYO, and 73.1% with RF (P < 0.001). Procedural and dwell times were significantly shorter with PFA, whereas the availability of a 3D mapping system led to a significant reduction in X-ray exposure with RF. Overall complication rates were 3.4% (n = 6) with PFA, 8.6% (n = 30) with CRYO, and 5.5% (n = 19) with RF (P = 0.052). The 1-year Kaplan–Meier estimated freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 79.3% with PFA, 74.7% with CRYO, and 72.4% with RF (log-rank P-value: 0.24). Among 145 repeat ablation procedures, PV reconnection rate was 19.1% after PFA, 27.5% after CRYO, and 34.8% after RF (P = 0.01). Pulsed field ablation contributed to significantly shorter procedural times. Follow-up data showed a similar arrhythmia freedom, although a higher rate of PV reconnection was documented in post-CRYO and post-RF redo procedures.

With the increasing interest in conduction system pacing (CSP) over the last few years and the inclusion of this treatment modality in the current guidelines, our aim was to provide a snapshot of current practice across Europe. An online questionnaire was sent to physicians participating in the European Heart Rhythm Association research network as well as to national societies and over social media. Data on previous experience with CSP, current indications, preferred tools, unmet needs, and perceptions for the future are reported and discussed.

No specific data are available on the influence of pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy and shape on cryoballoon ablation (CA) catheter efficacy in delivering cryothermal energy and, consequently, in obtaining PV isolation. Among a larger series of patients (68) with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent CA in our department, 52 patients were included in our study. All of them had a multislice cardiac computed tomography (MSCT) before the procedure. We retrospectively evaluated their MSCT scans focusing our attention on PV ovality and orientation in the frontal plane. A fair inverse association was documented between the ovality index of the left PVs and the degree of occlusion (r = −0.486 and P< 0.003 for the LSPV and r = −0.360 and P = 0.033 for the LIPV), whereas no association was found between the ovality index of the right PVs and the degree of occlusion (r = −0.283 and P = 0.083 for the RSPV and r = 0.235 and P = 0.093 for RIPV). Nevertheless, a strong inverse association was found between the orientation of the PV ostia and the degree of occlusion in each vein (r = −0.804 and P < 0.001 for the LSPV, r = −0.415 and P = 0.013 for LIPV, r = −0.798 and P < 0.001 for the RSPV, and r = −0.867 and P < 0.001 for RIPV). Pulmonary vein ostium shape and orientation evaluated by MSCT proved to be useful in predicting the degree of occlusion obtained during CA.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel technology for catheter-based atrial arrhythmia treatment. Evidence of its application for ventricular arrhythmia ablation is still limited. In this study, we describe the feasibility and efficacy of focal PFA for premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 20 patients referred for PVC ablation at 2 centers was enrolled, regardless of the presence of structural heart disease, PVC morphology, or previous ablation attempts. All procedures were performed using the CENTAURI System in combination with contact force sensing catheters and 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems. Energy output and the number of applications were left to the operator’s discretion. RESULTS: Eleven (55%) procedures were conducted under general anesthesia, 6 (30%) under deep sedation, and 3 (15%) under light sedation. Muscular contraction was observed in one case (5%). Median procedural and fluoroscopy times were 95.5 and 6.55 minutes, respectively. The median number of PFA applications was 8 with a median contact force of 10 g . A statistically significant (76%) reduction was observed in mean peak-to-peak bipolar electrogram voltage before and after ablation (0.707 versus 0.098 mV; P =0.008). Ventricular irritative firing was observed in 11 (55%) patients after PFA. The median follow-up was 120 days. Acute procedural success was achieved in 17 of 20 (85% [95% CI, 0.70–1]) patients. Two of the patients with procedural failure had late success with >80% clinical PVC burden suppression during follow-up, and 2 of 17 patients with acute success had late PVC recurrence, which accounts for a total of 17 of 20 (85% [95% CI, 0.70–1]) patients with chronic success. Transient ST-segment depression occurred in 1 patient, and the right bundle branch block was induced in 2 others (permanently only in one case). CONCLUSIONS: PVC ablation using a focal PFA is feasible, effective, and safe, with promising acute and long-term results in several ventricular locations. Irritative firing is frequently observed. Coronary evaluation should be considered when targeting the outflow tract.

Objectives: Assess the predictive accuracy of the WHO COVID-19 severity classification on COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The secondary aim was to compare its predictive power with a new prediction model, named COVID-19 EPI-SCORE, based on a Bayesian network analysis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a population of 295 COVID-19 RT-PCR positive patients hospitalized at Epicura Hospital Center, Belgium, admitted between March 1st and April 30th, 2020. Results: Our cohort’s median age was 73 (62–83) years, and the female proportion was 43%. All patients were classified following WHO severity classification at admission. In total, 125 (42.4%) were classified as Moderate, 69 (23.4%) as Severe, and 101 (34.2%) as Critical. Death proportions through these three classes were 11.2%, 33.3%, and 67.3%, respectively, and the proportions of critically ill patients (dead or needed Invasive Mechanical Ventilation) were 11.2%, 34.8%, and 83.2%, respectively. A Bayesian network analysis was used to create a model to analyze predictive accuracy of the WHO severity classification and to create the EPI-SCORE. The six variables that have been automatically selected by our machine learning algorithm were the WHO severity classification, acute kidney injury, age, Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels (LDH), lymphocytes and activated prothrombin time (aPTT). Receiver Operation Characteristic (ROC) curve indexes hereby obtained were 83.8% and 91% for the models based on WHO classification only and our EPI-SCORE, respectively. Conclusions: Our study shows that the WHO severity classification is reliable in predicting a severe outcome among COVID-19 patients. The addition to this classification of a few clinical and laboratory variables as per our COVID-19 EPI-SCORE has demonstrated to significantly increase its accuracy.