Mikael Höök

Dr. Mikael Höök


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMikael Höök
Mikael Höök
Xu TangXu Tang
Xu Tang

1 October 2013 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HVHanna Vikström
Hanna Vikström
SDSimon Davidsson
Simon Davidsson
MHMikael Höök
Mikael Höök

1 March 2010 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAKjell Aleklett
Kjell Aleklett
MHMikael Höök
Mikael Höök
KJKristofer Jakobsson
Kristofer Jakobsson
MLMichael Lardelli
Michael Lardelli
SSSimon Snowden
Simon Snowden
BSBengt Söderbergh
Bengt Söderbergh

1 June 2009 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMikael Höök
Mikael Höök
RHRobert Hirsch
Robert Hirsch
KAKjell Aleklett
Kjell Aleklett

1 November 2010 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMikael Höök
Mikael Höök
WZWerner Zittel
Werner Zittel
JSJörg Schindler
Jörg Schindler
KAKjell Aleklett
Kjell Aleklett

30 July 2009 in International Journal of Energy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMikael Höök
Mikael Höök
KAKjell Aleklett
Kjell Aleklett
Continued reliance on oil is unsustainable and this has resulted in interest in alternative fuels. Coal‐to‐liquids (CTL) can supply liquid fuels and have been successfully used in several cases, particularly in South Africa. This article reviews CTL theory and technology. Understanding the fundamental aspects of coal liquefaction technologies is vital for planning and policy‐making, as future CTL systems will be integrated in a much larger global energy and fuel utilization system. Conversion ratios for CTL are generally estimated to be between 1 and 2 barrels/ton coal. This puts a strict limitation on future CTL capacity imposed by future coal production volumes, regardless of other factors such as economics, emissions or environmental concerns. Assuming that 10% of world coal production can be diverted to CTL, the contribution to liquid fuel supply will be limited to only a few mega barrels per day. This prevents CTL from becoming a viable mitigation plan for liquid fuel shortage on a global scale. However, it is still possible for individual nations to derive significant shares of their fuel supply from CTL, but those nations must also have access to equally significant coal production capacities. It is unrealistic to claim that CTL provides a feasible solution to liquid fuels shortages created by peak oil. For the most part, it can only be a minor contributor and must be combined with other strategies. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.