Hae Kyung Kim

Dr. Hae Kyung Kim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 October 2020 in Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHae Kyung Kim
Hae Kyung Kim
SSSun Ok Song
Sun Ok Song
JNJunghyun Noh
Junghyun Noh
IJIn-Kyung Jeong
In-Kyung Jeong
BLByung Wan Lee
Byung Wan Lee
Background: Big data reports related to diseases and health care for the Korean population have been published since the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and the Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) Service provided limited open access to their databases. Here, we reviewed the structure, content, and means of using data from the National Health Insurance (NHI) system for the benefit of Korean researchers and presented the latest publication trends in Korean healthcare data procured from the NHI and HIRA databases. Methods: Since 2013, researchers have been able to obtain nationwide population-based studies using the NHI and HIRA databases of the insured. We searched publications using the NHI and the HIRA databases between 2013 and 2019 retrieved from PubMed. Results: The NHI and HIRA databases provide nationwide population-based data. The total number of publications from 2014 to 2019 using NHI and HIRA databases is 2,541 and 655, respectively. A total of 5,465 endocrinology-related studies were performed during 2014 to 2019. Conclusion: The NHIS and HIRA databases have provided tools for guidelines to approach world-leading population-based epidemiology and disease research.

22 October 2024 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHae Kyung Kim
Hae Kyung Kim
GBGeert Jan Biessels
Geert Jan Biessels
MYMin Heui Yu
Min Heui Yu
NHNamki Hong
Namki Hong
YLYong-Ho Lee
Yong-Ho Lee
MLMinyoung Lee
Minyoung Lee
Despite the mechanistic potential of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) to improve neurologic outcomes, the efficacy of SGLT2i in neurodegenerative disorders among patients with type 2 diabetes is not well established. This population-based cohort study aimed to investigate the association of SGLT2i use with risks of incident dementia and Parkinson disease (PD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. This was a retrospective examination of data from a cohort of 1,348,362 participants with type 2 diabetes (≥40 years), who started antidiabetic drugs from 2014 to 2019, evaluated using the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database. Propensity score matching (1:1; SGLT2i to other oral antidiabetic drugs [OADs]) produced a cohort of 358,862 participants. Primary outcomes were the individual incidence of Alzheimer disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and PD. Secondary outcomes were all-cause dementia (AD, VaD, and other dementia) and a composite of all-cause dementia and PD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the association between SGLT2i use and the risks of dementia and PD. From the 358,862 participants analyzed (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [9.6] years; 58.0% male), 6,837 incident dementia or PD events occurred. Regarding the individual endpoints, SGLT2i use was associated with reduced risks of AD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.87), VaD (aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.78), and PD (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.91) with a 6-month drug use lag period. In addition, use of SGLT2i was associated with a 21% lower risk of all-cause dementia (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90) and a 22% lower risk of all-cause dementia and PD than use of other OADs (aHR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.83). The association between the use of SGLT2i and the lowered risk of these neurodegenerative disorders was not affected by sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, diabetic complications, comorbidities, and medications. Sensitivity analysis further adjusting for bioclinical variables from health screening tests, including blood pressure, glucose, lipid profiles, and kidney function, yielded generally consistent results. In this nationwide population-based study, SGLT2i use significantly reduced the risks of neurodegenerative disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes independent of various factors including comorbidities and bioclinical parameters. This study provides Class II evidence that SGLT2 antidiabetic drugs decrease the risk of dementia and PD in people with diabetes.

31 January 2022 in Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHae Kyung Kim
Hae Kyung Kim
MLMinyoung Lee
Minyoung Lee
YLYong-Ho Lee
Yong-Ho Lee
EKEun Seok Kang
Eun Seok Kang
BCBong-Soo Cha
Bong-Soo Cha
BLByung Wan Lee
Byung Wan Lee
Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is closely associated with the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We investigated whether urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (u-NAG), an early renal tubular damage biomarker in DKD, could be related to the degree of hepatic fibrosis in patients with T2DM.Methods: A total of 300 patients with T2DM were enrolled in this study. Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were determined using transient elastography. The levels of urinary biomarkers, including u-NAG, albumin, protein, and creatinine, and glucometabolic parameters were measured.Results: Based on the median value of the u-NAG to creatinine ratio (u-NCR), subjects were divided into low and high u-NCR groups. The high u-NCR group showed a significantly longer duration of diabetes, worsened hyperglycemia, and a more enhanced hepatic fibrosis index. A higher u-NCR was associated with a greater odds ratio for the risk of higher hepatic fibrosis stage (F2: odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 3.82). Also, u-NCR was an independent predictive marker for more advanced hepatic fibrosis, even after adjusting for several confounding factors (β=1.58, P<0.01).Conclusion: The elevation of u-NAG was independently associated with a higher degree of hepatic fibrosis in patients with T2DM. Considering the common metabolic milieu of renal and hepatic fibrosis in T2DM, the potential use of u-NAG as an effective urinary biomarker reflecting hepatic fibrosis in T2DM needs to be validated in the future.

26 October 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHae Kyung Kim
Hae Kyung Kim
JHJae-Won Hong
Jae-Won Hong
JMJu Hyung Moon
Ju Hyung Moon
SASung Gwe Ahn
Sung Gwe Ahn
Eui Hyun KimEui Hyun Kim
Eui Hyun Kim
Cheol Ryong KuCheol Ryong Ku
Cheol Ryong Ku
Predicting dopamine agonist resistance in patients with macroprolactinoma is essential for clinicians to prevent treatment failure and subsequent complications such as medication-induced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea. We evaluated the features of patients with cabergoline resistance and CSF rhinorrhea in patients with prolactinomas with prolactin levels ≥1000 ng/mL. A total of 140 patients who were newly diagnosed with prolactinoma secreting only prolactin ≥1000 ng/mL and treated with cabergoline for the first time were included in this study. Based on the hormonal and radiologic response of the prolactinoma, the patients were divided into responders and non-responders. Non-responders (36/140, 25.8%) included a higher number of patients receiving hormone replacement than responders (responders, n (%) = 12(11.5) vs. non-responders = 13(36.1), p = 0.001). In propensity score matching analysis, patients who developed CSF rhinorrhea presented more frequent hormone deficiency than responders regardless of initial cabergoline dose. Hormone deficiency was associated with a greater odds ratio for the risk of non-responders (adjusted odds ratio = 5.13, 95% CI 1.96–13.46, p = 0.001). Cabergoline was effective in bioactive macroprolactinoma. Furthermore, initial cabergoline dose was not significantly associated with long-term responsiveness and development of CSF rhinorrhea but the hypopituitarism was independently associated with an increased risk of cabergoline resistance and CSF rhinorrhea.

19 September 2022 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJihoon Kim
Jihoon Kim
HKHae Kyung Kim
Hae Kyung Kim
CCChoon Hee Chung
Choon Hee Chung
Kim J, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Sep;37(39):e278. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e278

30 March 2022 in Kyung Hee Law Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHae Kyung Kim
Hae Kyung Kim
???? ?籹?? ???????????? ???????? ü?ῡ ???? ???????? ???? ?????ߴ?. ?? ?????? ?׻?Ȳ?? ?߽?????, 21???? ?Ϻ? ???ν??? ???뿡 ???? ?ѱ??? ??????????? ?????? ???̴?. ?Ϻ??????? ???γ? ?????????? ?????? ?????̹??ø? ħ???ϴ? ???·? ???ź???? ?ǽ?????2?? ??????? ???????? ?ݼ??? ??ȸ?????? ?θ? ?????Ǿ?, ???? ?????? ?־?? ?????????? ?????? ???õ? ???? ?????? ?⺻ ?̳????? ????Ǿ? ?Դ?. ?̷?????, ???????????˹??????࿡?? ?????? ?ǹ?ȭ?? ?? ?????˿? ???? ?ù? ?ݹ??? ???? ???? ???????? ??ȵǾ? ?Դ?. ?׷??? ??????, ?Ϻ? ???δ? ?????? ??Ī?? ???׷??? ?غ??ˡ??? ?????? ??????ü???? ???ؼ??? ?׷? ??å?? ?־????? ?ϴ? ?? ?????? ?Ұ??᡹?̶?? ?????? ä???ϰ??ִٴ? ū ???????? ?ִ?. ????, ?? ???࿡???? ???????? ?Ѵ? ???? ?????? ???????? ?????? ??? ???ؼ? ????Ű?? ???˸? ?????Ѵ١???? ?ǵ??? ?????? ?????? ?ִ?. ??????, ?ѱ??? ?? ??ħ?? ???? ?׷??? ???õ? ?????????? ?ָ????? ?ʰ?, ?????࿡ ????Ǿ? ?ִ?ó?? ??ǿ? ????, ?赵?ڿ? ???? ???? ????, ???νŸŸ? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????ߴ?. ???????????? ?ϴ??? ?׷???? ?Ϳ? ?ǽ????? ??????, ?Ϻ??? ?־?? ?????࿡ ????ü???? ??ǥ?? ?ϴ? ?ǵ??κ??? ?׷????? ?????? ???ο? ???? ?̿?? ?????? ??Ȳ?ӿ? ?и??ϴ?.