Brain tumors in infants account for less than 10% of all pediatric nervous system tumors. They include tumors diagnosed in fetal age, neonatal age and in the first years of life. Among these, high-grade gliomas (HGGs) are a specific entity with a paradoxical clinical course that sets them apart from their pediatric and adult counterparts. Currently, surgery represents the main therapeutic strategy in the management of these tumors. Chemotherapy does not have a well-defined role whilst radiotherapy is rarely performed, considering its late effects. Information about molecular characterization is still limited, but it could represent a new fundamental tool in the therapeutic perspective of these tumors. Chimeric proteins derived from the fusion of several genes with neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase mutations have been described in high-grade gliomas in infants as well as in neonatal age and the recent discovery of targeted drugs may change the long-term prognosis of these tumors, along with other target-driven therapies. The aim of this mini review is to highlight the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade gliomas in infants with a particular focus on the molecular landscape of these neoplasms and future clinical applications.

Brain tumors in infants including those diagnosed in fetal age, newborns and under a year old represent less than 10% of pediatric nervous system tumors and present differently when compared with older children in terms of clinical traits, location and histology. The most frequent clinical finding is a macrocephaly but non-specific symptoms can also be associated. The prognosis is usually poor and depends on several factors. Surgery continues to be the main option in terms of therapeutic strategies whereas the role of chemotherapy is not yet well defined and radiotherapy is exceptionally undertaken. In view of this situation, a molecular characterization could assist in providing therapeutic options for these tumors. This review highlights the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors in infants with a particular focus on the molecular landscape and future clinical applications.

Background: The association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is still uncertain. In this multicenter retrospective study, the coexistence of both diseases was investigated in children diagnosed from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. Methods: Clinical characteristics of both IBD and ITP, onset of disorders, and patient’s response to treatment were collected through a structured form sent to 55 Italian pediatric referring centers for hematological disorders. Result: Centers responded to the survey and reported the coexistence of IBD and ITP in 14 children. The first diagnosis was ITP in 57.1% and IBD in 35.7% of patients: it was simultaneous in 7.1%. IBD was classified as ulcerative colitis (57.1%), Crohn disease (35.7%), and unclassified (7.1%). No therapy for IBD other than steroids had any effect on ITP course. Colectomy resulted in recovery from ITP in 1 of the 2 patients surgically treated. ITP was always mild but turned to be chronic in half of patients. Conclusions: In all patients, ITP was mild without any evident impact on IBD severity, but the incidence of chronic ITP seems to be higher than what is usually observed in the pediatric age group. Colectomy had unpredictable effects on ITP.

Patient input is critical for all aspects of value-based healthcare design. This contribution describes the following: the specifics of communications with doctors regarding the disease in adolescents and young adults with cancer; the patients’ thoughts, emotions and changes in self-perception; “other meanings” taking shape along the treatment pathway; and reacting modes to the disease and treatments. Thirty-five Italian AYA patients in follow-up (age 18–24) were involved in a plenary interview on the cited aspects of their oncological experience. The answers were analyzed by MADIT (Analysis Methodology of Computerized Textual Data) with the software SPAD. MADIT allowed us to perform text analysis, describe the graphical outcomes and discuss the results. Respondents took a first-person perspective and their personal narrative recall had objective and unequivocal connotations. Experience was narrated mainly by maintenance repertoires that fix the reality of disease, its treatments and personal identity. The account focused on the tumor and on an agreed approach to it. The time “after” was described as a distressing space that defines them. Making sense of the events was considered a significant help. Professionals need to focus on the discursive repertoires of communication with which the inner and outer reality are built. Lastly, these patients required a two-way dialogue throughout the entire caring process.

Background: Acute pain in children is frequently under-recognized and undertreated despite validated assessment tools and effective therapies. This systematic review aimed to synthesize recent evidence on assessment and management of acute pediatric pain. Methods: The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Clinical questions were developed using the PICO framework, and evidence certainty was assessed with GRADE. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published from 2016 to 2025. Italian pediatric scientific societies and specialists involved in acute pediatric care contributed to the process. Results: A total of 13 studies were included. Validated pain scales showed high reliability and were associated with reduced pain scores after analgesic administration. Paracetamol and ibuprofen showed comparable efficacy for mild-to-moderate pain; evidence suggesting a modest late advantage of ibuprofen was inconsistent. Combination therapy reduced rescue analgesia in individual studies. Non-pharmacological interventions, including virtual reality, distraction, and hospital play, reduced anxiety and procedural distress, although certainty of evidence was low. Evidence on opioids was limited and did not show clear superiority over non-opioid strategies. Intranasal fentanyl appeared comparable to intravenous morphine and more feasible in emergency settings. Overall, evidence for several clinical questions remains limited, and GRADE recommendations were only possible for selected PICOs. Conclusions: Acute pediatric pain management should rely on structured assessment and multimodal strategies. Validated pain scales should be used routinely. Paracetamol and ibuprofen remain first-line treatments for mild-to-moderate pain, with possible context-specific benefits of ibuprofen or combination therapy. Non-pharmacological interventions may be useful adjuncts, especially for anxiety and procedural distress. Further high-quality studies are needed on opioids, intranasal administration, alternating regimens, and inhaled versus topical analgesia.