Giovanna-Stefania Colafati

Dr. Giovanna-Stefania Colafati

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMatthew Clarke
Matthew Clarke
AMAlan Mackay
Alan Mackay
BIBritta Ismer
Britta Ismer
JPJessica Pickles
Jessica Pickles
RTRuth G. Tatevossian
Ruth G. Tatevossian
CJChris Jones
Chris Jones
Infant high-grade gliomas appear clinically distinct from their counterparts in older children, indicating that histopathologic grading may not accurately reflect the biology of these tumors. We have collected 241 cases under 4 years of age, and carried out histologic review, methylation profiling, and custom panel, genome, or exome sequencing. After excluding tumors representing other established entities or subgroups, we identified 130 cases to be part of an “intrinsic” spectrum of disease specific to the infant population. These included those with targetable MAPK alterations, and a large proportion of remaining cases harboring gene fusions targeting ALK (n = 31), NTRK1/2/3 (n = 21), ROS1 (n = 9), and MET (n = 4) as their driving alterations, with evidence of efficacy of targeted agents in the clinic. These data strongly support the concept that infant gliomas require a change in diagnostic practice and management. Significance: Infant high-grade gliomas in the cerebral hemispheres comprise novel subgroups, with a prevalence of ALK, NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, or MET gene fusions. Kinase fusion–positive tumors have better outcome and respond to targeted therapy clinically. Other subgroups have poor outcome, with fusion-negative cases possibly representing an epigenetically driven pluripotent stem cell phenotype. See related video: https://vimeo.com/438254885 See related commentary by Szulzewsky and Cimino, p. 904. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 890

1 May 2017 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrea CaraiAndrea Carai
Andrea Carai
Angela MastronuzziAngela Mastronuzzi
Angela Mastronuzzi
DADe Benedictis Alessandro
De Benedictis Alessandro
RMRaffaella Messina
Raffaella Messina
ACANTONELLA CACCHIONE
ANTONELLA CACCHIONE
CMCarlo Efisio Marras
Carlo Efisio Marras

19 September 2017 in Brain Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAntonio Chiaretti
Antonio Chiaretti
GCGiorgio Conti
Giorgio Conti
Benedetto FalsiniBenedetto Falsini
Benedetto Falsini
Danilo BuonsensoDanilo Buonsenso
Danilo Buonsenso
MCMatteo Crasti
Matteo Crasti
RRRiccardo Riccardi
Riccardo Riccardi
Nerve growth factor (NGF) promotes neural recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) supporting neuronal growth, differentiation and survival of brain cells and up-regulating the neurogenesis-associated protein Doublecortin (DCX). Only a few studies reported NGF administration in paediatric patients with severe TBI. A four-year-old boy in a persistent unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) was treated with intranasal murine NGF administration 6 months after severe TBI. The patient received four cycles of intranasal NGF (0.1 mg/kg, twice a day for 10 consecutive days). NGF administration improved functional [Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT); Single photon emission/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)] assessment, electrophysiological [Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Visual Evoked Potential (VEP)] studies and clinical conditions. He showed improvements in voluntary movements, facial mimicry, phonation, attention and verbal comprehension, ability to cry, cough reflex, oral motility, feeding capacity, and bowel and urinary functions. After NGF administration, raised levels of both NGF and DCX were found in the cerebrospinal fluid of the patient. No side effects were reported. Although further studies are needed for better understanding the neuroprotective role of this neurotrophin, intranasal NGF administration appears to be a promising and safe rescuing strategy treatment in children with neurological impairment after TBI.

15 December 2011 in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDiego Martinelli
Diego Martinelli
JHJohannes Häberle
Johannes Häberle
Vicente RubioVicente Rubio
Vicente Rubio
CGCecilia Giunta
Cecilia Giunta
IHIngrid Hausser
Ingrid Hausser
CDCarlo Dionisi-Vici
Carlo Dionisi-Vici

28 November 2018 in Journal of Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FEFrancesco Esposito
Francesco Esposito
DFDolores Ferrara
Dolores Ferrara
MSMarco Di Serafino
Marco Di Serafino
MDMario Diplomatico
Mario Diplomatico
NVNorberto Vezzali
Norberto Vezzali
PTPaolo Toma
Paolo Toma

14 November 2018 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFrancesca Del Bufalo
Francesca Del Bufalo
GCGiulia Ceglie
Giulia Ceglie
ACANTONELLA CACCHIONE
ANTONELLA CACCHIONE
IAIside Alessi
Iside Alessi
GCGiovanna-Stefania Colafati
Giovanna-Stefania Colafati
FLFranco Locatelli
Franco Locatelli
Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are the most common central nervous system tumors in children. Prognosis depends on complete surgical resection. For patients not amenable of gross total resection (GTR) new approaches are needed. The BRAF mutation V600E is critical for the pathogenesis of pediatric gliomas and specific inhibitors of the mutated protein, such as Vemurafenib, are available. We investigated the safety and efficacy of Vemurafenib as single agent in pediatric patients with V600E+ LGG. From November 2013 to May 2018, 7 patients have been treated in our Institution; treatment was well-tolerated, the main concern being dermatological toxicity. The best responses to treatment were: 1 complete response, 3 partial responses, 1 stable disease, only one patient progressed; in one patient, the follow-up is too short to establish the clinical response. Two patients discontinued treatment, and, in both cases, immediate progression of the disease was observed. In one case the treatment was discontinued due to toxicity, in the other one the previously assessed BRAF V600E mutation was not confirmed by further investigation. Two patients, after obtaining a response, progressed during treatment, suggesting the occurrence of resistance mechanisms. Clinical response, with improvement of the neurologic function, was observed in all patients a few weeks after the therapy was started. Despite the limitations inherent to a small and heterogeneous cohort, this experience, suggests that Vemurafenib represents a treatment option in pediatric patients affected by LGG and carrying BRAF mutation V600E.