Damien Ricard

Damien Ricard


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2012 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDamien Ricard
Damien Ricard
Ahmed IdbaihAhmed Idbaih
Ahmed Idbaih
FDFrancois Ducray
Francois Ducray
MLMarion Lahutte
Marion Lahutte
KHKhê Hoang-Xuan
Khê Hoang-Xuan
JDJean-Yves Delattre
Jean-Yves Delattre

1 December 2019 in Revue Neurologique
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVA. Vienne-Jumeau
A. Vienne-Jumeau
CTC. Tafani
C. Tafani
DRDamien Ricard
Damien Ricard

11 January 2012 in Investigational New Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFlavie Bompaire
Flavie Bompaire
CMChristine Mateus
Christine Mateus
HTHervé Taillia
Hervé Taillia
TGThierry De Greslan
Thierry De Greslan
MLMarion Lahutte
Marion Lahutte
DRDamien Ricard
Damien Ricard

19 November 2018 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LOLaurent Oudre
Laurent Oudre
RBRémi Barrois-Müller
Rémi Barrois-Müller
TMThomas Moreau
Thomas Moreau
CTCharles Truong
Charles Truong
AJAliénor Vienne Jumeau
Aliénor Vienne Jumeau
PVPierre-Paul Vidal
Pierre-Paul Vidal
This article presents a method for step detection from accelerometer and gyrometer signals recorded with Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). The principle of our step detection algorithm is to recognize the start and end times of the steps in the signal thanks to a predefined library of templates. The algorithm is tested on a database of 1020 recordings, composed of healthy subjects and patients with various neurological or orthopedic troubles. Simulations on more than 40,000 steps show that the template-based method achieves remarkable results with a 98% recall and a 98% precision. The method adapts well to pathological subjects and can be used in a medical context for robust step estimation and gait characterization.

1 October 2020 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSylvain Jung
Sylvain Jung
MMMona Michaud
Mona Michaud
LOLaurent Oudre
Laurent Oudre
EDEric Dorveaux
Eric Dorveaux
LGLouis Gorintin
Louis Gorintin
DRDamien Ricard
Damien Ricard
This article presents an overview of fifty-eight articles dedicated to the evaluation of physical activity in free-living conditions using wearable motion sensors. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the technical aspects linked to sensors (types, number, body positions, and technical characteristics) as well as a deep discussion on the protocols implemented in free-living conditions (environment, duration, instructions, activities, and annotation). Finally, it presents a description and a comparison of the main algorithms and processing tools used for assessing physical activity from raw signals.

1 November 2009 in Current Opinion in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDamien Ricard
Damien Ricard
HTHervé Taillia
Hervé Taillia
JRJean-Luc Renard
Jean-Luc Renard
Treatment-induced brain toxicity remains a major cause of morbidity in adult patients with cancer. Contrasting with the 40-year-old unresolved controversy about the primary damaging event (vascular versus parenchymal) in the physiopathology, numerous prospective clinical trials have recently addressed the question of brain toxicity. Despite remarkable efforts in methodological design, they often only partially answer the questions of which treatment modalities are responsible, which brain functions are mainly impaired, how long the impairment duration is and which characteristics make patients vulnerable. Real advances in the design of safer radiation procedures have been counterbalanced by a wider use of combined radiotherapy-chemotherapy regimens, the development of radiosurgery and the increasing number of long-term survivors. Although classic radionecrosis or chemonecrosis has become less common, more subtle changes such as progressive cognitive dysfunction are increasingly reported after radiotherapy (radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy) or chemotherapy, administered alone or in combination as reviewed here. The methodological aspects of published studies are questioned and suggestions are provided that may improve the design of future trials. The abovementioned issue is of clinical importance given the number of patients treated for brain tumors, including patients with brain metastases, and the number of patients who are at high risk for brain metastasis who could benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation. Moreover, drugs used in nonbrain tumors are now recognized to impair brain normal functioning.