Background Embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) has emerged as a potential treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs). Objective To evaluate the impact on recurrence rate of postsurgical embolization of CSDH in patients with a higher than average risk of recurrence. Methods A monocentric retrospective study was performed on retrospectively collected data. From March 2018 to December 2019, embolization of the MMA was proposed as an adjunct postoperative treatment after burr-hole surgery in patients operated for a recurrent CSDH or a CSDH with an independent recurrence risk factor, including antiplatelet therapy, full anticoagulation therapy, coagulation disorder, hepatopathy, or chronic alcoholism. Patients who had undergone postoperative embolization were compared with a historic group of patients operated between March 2016 and March 2018, selected based on the same inclusion criteria. Results During the study period, 89 patients (with 74 unilateral and 15 bilateral CSDHs) were included and underwent an embolization procedure, leading to 91 out of a total of 104 MMA being embolized (88%). These were compared with 174 patients (138 unilateral and 36 bilateral CSDH) in the historic control group. One major procedure-related adverse event was registered. Four of the 89 patients (4%) required surgery for a CSDH recurrence in the embolization group, significantly less than the 24 of 174 patients (14%) in the control group (OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.86, p=0.02). Conclusions Postsurgical embolization of the MMA may reduce the recurrence rate of CSDHs with a risk factor of recurrence.

Importance: Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has been proposed as a potential treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).Objective: To assess the efficacy of MMA embolization in reducing the risk of CSDH recurrence at 6 months compared with standard care in patients who underwent an operation and were at high risk of CSDH recurrence.Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial with blinded end point assessment. Patients who underwent an operation for CSDH recurrence or a first CSDH episode at high risk of recurrence were recruited from July 2020 to March 2023 in 12 French neurosurgical or comprehensive neurosurgical and interventional neuroradiology centers. Last follow-up took place on November 2, 2023.Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to undergo MMA embolization with microparticles within 7 days of surgery (171 patients, intervention group) or standard medical care alone (171 patients, control group).Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the rate of CSDH recurrence at 6 months assessed by an independent, blinded adjudication committee. There were 5 secondary end points, including rates of repeat surgery for homolateral CSDH recurrence during the 6-month follow-up period and embolization procedure–related complications.Results: Among 342 randomized patients (median [IQR] age, 77 [68-83] years; 274 [80.1%] male), 308 (90.1%) completed the trial. The primary end point was observed in 24 of 162 (14.8%) and 33 of 157 (21.0%) patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively (after imputation: odds ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.36-1.14]; adjusted absolute difference, −6% [95% CI, −14% to 2%]; P = .13). The groups did not significantly differ in any of the secondary end points. Repeat surgery was performed in 7 of 162 (4.3%) and 13 of 157 (8.3%) patients in the intervention and control groups (P = .14), respectively. Minor and major embolization procedure–related complications occurred in 3 of 171 (1.8%) and 1 of 171 (0.6%) patients, respectively.Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, among patients who underwent an operation for CSDH recurrence or a first CSDH episode at high risk of recurrence, MMA embolization did not lead to a significantly lower rate of recurrence at 6 months compared with standard medical care alone. However, the magnitude of the effect estimate is consistent with other recent trials, including some that demonstrated the benefit of MMA embolization with nonadhesive liquid embolic agents, and these findings considered together may inform future studies and potential use of this therapeutic approach for CSDH management.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04372147

Background Neurointerventionists lack guidelines for the use of antithrombotic therapies in their clinical practice; consequently, there is likely to be significant heterogeneity in antithrombotic use between centers. Through a nationwide survey, we aimed to obtain an exhaustive cross-sectional overview of antithrombotic use in neurointerventional procedures in France. Methods In April 2021, French neurointerventional surgery centers were invited to participate in a nationwide 51-question survey disseminated through an active trainee-led research collaborative network (the JENI-RC). Results All 40 centers answered the survey. Fifty-one percent of centers reported using ticagrelor and 43% used clopidogrel as premedication before intracranial stenting. For flow diversion treatment, dual antiplatelet therapy was maintained for 3 or 6 months in 39% and 53% of centers, respectively, and aspirin was prescribed for 12 months or more than 12 months in 63% and 26% of centers, respectively. For unruptured aneurysms, the most common heparin bolus dose was 50 IU/kg (59%), and only 35% of centers monitored heparin activity for dose adjustment. Tirofiban was used in 64% of centers to treat thromboembolic complications. Fifteen percent of these comprehensive stroke centers reported using tenecteplase to treat acute ischemic strokes. Cangrelor appeared as an emergent drug in specific indications. Conclusion This nationwide survey highlights the important heterogeneity in clinical practices across centers. There is a pressing need for trials and guidelines to further evaluate and harmonize antithrombotic regimens in the neurointerventional field.

Background Balloon-assisted techniques can improve the endovascular treatment of cerebrospinal vascular malformations. The aim of this study was to report the first clinical multicenter experience with the new Scepter Mini dual-lumen microballoon catheter. Methods Patients with cerebral or spinal vascular malformations treated with the Scepter Mini at seven European neurovascular centers were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, angiographic features of the vascular malformations, procedural parameters including the type of application, navigability, technical failures, complications and embolization success were assessed. Results The usage of 34 Scepter Mini microballoon catheters in 20 patients was analyzed. Most treated malformations (80.0%) were cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Four different applications were reported: embolization via Scepter Mini (n=23, 67.6%), balloon-occlusion with simultaneous embolization via a second microcatheter (n=3, 8.8%), diagnostic angiography with simultaneous balloon-inflation for flow arrest (n=4, 11.8%), and navigation support (n=4, 11.8%). The mean diameter of the blood vessels in which the Scepter Mini was inflated was 1.9±0.5 mm. The navigability of the Scepter Mini was rated as ‘easy’ or ‘very easy’ in 88.2% of cases. Complete occlusion of the malformation was achieved in 60.9% of cases. Technical failures occurred in 4/23 embolization procedures, and all were related to insufficient stability of the balloon within the vessel. No complications related to the Scepter Mini were observed, while unrelated complications occurred in three patients (15.0%). Conclusions The Scepter Mini is a promising new device for balloon-assisted embolization of cerebrospinal vascular malformations via small feeders. Beyond embolization, the Scepter Mini can also be used for other applications, such as superselective flow arrest and navigation support.

Background Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing (NICE) lesions are exceptionally rare following aneurysm endovascular therapy (EVT). Objective To investigate the presenting features and longitudinal follow-up of patients with NICE lesions following aneurysm EVT. Methods Patients included in a retrospective national multicentre inception cohort were analysed. NICE lesions were defined, using MRI, as delayed onset punctate, nodular or annular foci enhancements with peri-lesion edema, distributed in the vascular territory of the aneurysm EVT, with no other confounding disease. Results From a pool of 58 815 aneurysm endovascular treatment procedures during the study sampling period (2006–2019), 21/37 centres identified 31 patients with 32 aneurysms of the anterior circulation who developed NICE lesions (mean age 45±10 years). Mean delay to diagnosis was 5±9 months, with onset occurring a month or less after the index EVT procedure in 10 out of 31 patients (32%). NICE lesions were symptomatic at time of onset in 23 of 31 patients (74%). After a mean follow-up of 25±26 months, 25 patients (81%) were asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic without disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–1) at last follow-up while 4 (13%) presented with mild disability (mRS score 2). Clinical follow-up data were unavailable for two patients. Follow-up MRI (available in 27 patients; mean time interval after onset of 22±22 months) demonstrated persistent enhancement in 71% of cases. Conclusions The clinical spectrum of NICE lesions following aneurysm EVT therapy spans a wide range of neurological symptoms. Clinical course is most commonly benign, although persistent long-term enhancement is frequent.