Long-term survival data in relation to sub-sites, human papillomavirus (HPV), and p16^INK4a (p16) for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is still sparse. Furthermore, reports have indicated atypical and late recurrences for patients with HPV and p16 positive OPSCC. Therefore, we assessed long-term survival and recurrence in relation to oropharyngeal subsite and HPV/p16 status. A total of 529 patients with OPSCC, diagnosed in the period 2000–2010, with known HPVDNA and p16-status, were included. HPV/p16 status and sub-sites were correlated to disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS respectively). The overexpression of p16 (p16⁺) is associated with significantly better long-term OS and DFS in tonsillar and base of tongue carcinomas (TSCC/BOTSCC), but not in patients with other OPSCC. Patients with HPVDNA⁺/p16⁺ TSCC/BOTSCC presented better OS and DFS compared to those with HPVDNA⁻/p16⁻ tumors, while those with HPVDNA⁻/p16⁺ cancer had an intermediate survival. Late recurrences were rare, and significantly more frequent in patients with p16⁻ tumors, while the prognosis after relapse was poor independent of HPVDNA^+/−/p16^+/− status. In conclusion, patients with p16⁺ OPSCC do not have more late recurrences than p16⁻, and a clear prognostic value of p16⁺ was only observed in TSCC/BOTSCC. Finally, the combination of HPVDNA and p16 provided superior prognostic information compared to p16 alone in TSCC/BOTSCC.

Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer is challenging, and cumulative dose constraints and dose/volume data are scarce. In this study, we present dose/volume data for patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer and explore the correlations of cumulative dose to organs at risk and severe side effects. We analyzed 54 patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2017. Organs at risk were delineated and dose/volume data were collected from cumulative treatment plans of all included patients. Receiver–operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the association between dose/volume parameters and the risk of toxicity. The ROC-curve for a logistic model of carotid blowout vs. maximum doses to the carotid arteries showed AUC = 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.89). The near-maximum dose to bones showed an association with the risk of osteoradionecrosis: AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.95) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.52). Our analysis showed an association between cumulative dose to organs at risk and the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis and carotid blowout, and our results support the existing dose constraint for the carotid arteries of 120 Gy. The confirmation of these dose–response relationships will contribute to further improvements of re-irradiation strategies.

Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy with cetuximab is the standard of care for relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The aim of this trial was to investigate whether cetuximab and paclitaxel/carboplatin can achieve similar progression-free survival (PFS) with standard cetuximab and 5-FU/platinum-based chemotherapy. Standard chemotherapy treatment for SCCHN is related to severe toxicity and new, less toxic regimens are needed. Methods: In this multicentre, randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial, 85 patients with relapsed or metastatic SCCHN were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to cetuximab and 5-FU/cisplatin or carboplatin (arm A) vs. cetuximab and paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm B). Eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0–1, and adequate organ functions. The primary endpoint was to investigate whether PFS in arm B is significantly worse than PFS in arm A. Results: Median PFS in arm A was 4.37 months (95% CI: 2.9–5.9 m) and 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.8–8.2 m) in arm B, (p = 0.064). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.3–11.5 m) in arm A and 10.2 months (95% CI: 5.4–15 m) in arm B, (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.43–1.16). PFS HR for arm B was not significantly worse than arm A (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.41–1.03). Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in arm A than arm B (60% vs. 40%; p = 0.034). Conclusion: Cetuximab and paclitaxel/carboplatin was found to have similar efficacy and less toxicity compared to cetuximab and 5-FU/cisplatin or carboplatin. The experimental arm is easier to administer rendering it a favorable alternative to standard therapy.

Background: Disease-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) is the most validated prognostic tool for patients with brain metastasized lung cancer. The Lung-molGPA scoring system was recently introduced for oncogenic-driven brain metastasized lung cancer, but has not yet been validated in cohorts including only ALK-translocated tumors. Methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study consisting of 44 patients with brain metastasized ALK-positive, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated between January 2009 and November 2019 at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Information about demographics and clinicopathological parameters were collected. Predictors of overall survival (OS) were identified by Cox regression analyses. A bootstrap validation with 1000 samples was performed in order to compare the different prognostic scores. Results: The variables found to independently influence OS in the multivariate analysis, i.e., PS, sex and brain metastases at diagnosis, were used as prognostic variables in our new prognostic index (ALK-BPI). Patients were divided into two prognostic groups. The median OS was 65.7 months for the good prognostic group and 22.7 months for the poor prognostic group (p = 0.0068). In the univariate analysis of the different prognostic scores, ALK-BPI performed better than the others (HR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.3–9.9). The mean C-statistics of the different prognostic scores were compared to each other, and no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: We propose the ALK-BPI score as a new prognostic tool that can easily be applied for ALK-positive lung cancer patients with brain metastases in daily clinical practice, as it has at least the same prognostic value as Lung-molGPA.

This study investigated whether scheduled adaptive radiotherapy (ART) improved delivered dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with dose painting (DP). Delivered doses were estimated for 81 patients who were prospectively treated with DP + ART using deformable image registration between CBCT and the planning CT’s. Three simulations were conducted, evaluating (1) a scenario without replanning (Sim_noART), (2) a scenario with ART at fraction 12 (Sim_ART), and (3) the clinical practice with ad hoc replanning (Sim_delivered). It was further evaluated whether selecting patients for ART using accumulated dose in the first 10 fractions (Df10) to the parotid glands and larynx would improve ART efficacy. In Sim_noART, 41% of patients had delivered dose deviations ≥ 3 Gy compared to the planned dose in any OAR, primarily in the parotid glands and larynx. No significant differences were seen between Sim_noART, Sim_ART and Sim_delivered (P ≥ 0.10). Df10 predicted relevant changes upon completing treatment with AUC ≥ 0.95. By selecting patients for ART using Df10, delivered dose significantly improved for the larynx (P ≤ 0.01). Although relevant dose differences between planned and delivered doses were seen in almost half of the patients without ART, minimal improvements in delivered doses were seen introducing ART. Nonetheless, Df10 was prognostic for relevant changes upon completing treatment and selecting patients for ART significantly improved larynx dose. Incorporating accumulated dose into patient selection for ART could help avoid unforeseen increases in delivered dose.