Sachin Mangla

Dr. Sachin Mangla

Jindal Global Business School, O P Jindal Global University, Haryana-131001, India

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 January 2022 in Annals of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Satish KumarSatish Kumar
Satish Kumar
DSDipasha Sharma
Dipasha Sharma
SRSandeep Rao
Sandeep Rao
Marc LimMarc Lim
Marc Lim
Sachin ManglaSachin Mangla
Sachin Mangla

15 October 2020 in Business Strategy and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IKIpek Kazancoglu
Ipek Kazancoglu
MSMuhittin Sagnak
Muhittin Sagnak
Sachin ManglaSachin Mangla
Sachin Mangla
Yigit KazancogluYigit Kazancoglu
Yigit Kazancoglu
The transition to the circular economy (CE) creates value through the closed‐loop systems, reverse logistics, product life cycle management, and clean production in terms of corporate environmental management. During this transition process, the organization faces many barriers such as financial, organizational, technology‐based, social, policy‐related, market‐based, and logistics‐based barriers. The objectives of this study are to propose a framework highlighting policy‐related barriers for a supply chain in the transition to CE and finally discuss potential implications on enhancing corporate environmental performance of a business. Further, this study evaluates the causal relationships between the policy‐related barriers using fuzzy Decision‐Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. The application was conducted in an apparel firm in Turkey. From findings, lack of legislation for efficient CE (C4), lack of mandatory requirements and responsibilities for manufacturers/suppliers for the CE (C17), and lack of government support for environmentally friendly policies (C2) are revealed as the most important barriers, respectively. It is found that lack of attitude and awareness about CE in government institutions (C19) is the most influencing factor, whereas lack of effective recycling policies to achieve quality in waste management (C8) is the most influenced factor. The recommendations were developed for enhancing the corporate environmental performance of businesses through incentives and unique rewards, improving communication among stakeholders, the government's perception of CE and current linear economy, cooperation with nongovernmental organization (NGOs) and civil actions, the vision of government towards circular principles, the circular public procurement, the local governments in circular policymaking, and awareness of bureaucracy and government officials.

1 January 2020 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSurajit Bag
Surajit Bag
LWLincoln C. Wood
Lincoln C. Wood
Sachin ManglaSachin Mangla
Sachin Mangla
SLSunil Luthra
Sunil Luthra

1 May 2021 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAnish Kumar
Anish Kumar
Sachin ManglaSachin Mangla
Sachin Mangla
PKPradeep Kumar
Pradeep Kumar
MSMalin Song
Malin Song

1 October 2020 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YOYesim Deniz Ozkan-Ozen
Yesim Deniz Ozkan-Ozen
Yigit KazancogluYigit Kazancoglu
Yigit Kazancoglu
Sachin ManglaSachin Mangla
Sachin Mangla

30 July 2018 in Information Systems Frontiers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNripendra P. Rana
Nripendra P. Rana
SLSunil Luthra
Sunil Luthra
Sachin ManglaSachin Mangla
Sachin Mangla
RIRubina Islam
Rubina Islam
SRSian Roderick
Sian Roderick
YDYogesh K. Dwivedi
Yogesh K. Dwivedi
Smart city development is gaining considerable recognition in the systematic literature and international policies throughout the world. The study aims to identify the key barriers of smart cities from a review of existing literature and views of experts in this area. This work further makes an attempt on the prioritisation of barriers to recognise the most important barrier category and ranking of specific barriers within the categories to the development of smart cities in India. Through the existing literature, this work explored 31 barriers of smart cities development and divided them into six categories. This research work employed fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique to prioritise the selected barriers. Findings reveal that ‘Governance’ is documented as the most significant category of barriers for smart city development followed by ‘Economic; ‘Technology’; ‘Social’; ‘Environmental’ and ‘Legal and Ethical’. In this work, authors also performed sensitivity analysis to validate the findings of study. This research is useful to the government and policymakers for eradicating the potential interferences in smart city development initiatives in developing countries like India.