Victor Spoormaker

Dr. Victor Spoormaker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMax Schneider
Max Schneider
PHPamela Hathway
Pamela Hathway
LLLaura Leuchs
Laura Leuchs
PSPhilipp G. Sämann
Philipp G. Sämann
MCMichael Czisch
Michael Czisch
VSVictor Spoormaker
Victor Spoormaker

1 September 2018 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMax Schneider
Max Schneider
LLLaura Leuchs
Laura Leuchs
MCMichael Czisch
Michael Czisch
PSPhilipp G. Sämann
Philipp G. Sämann
VSVictor Spoormaker
Victor Spoormaker

27 September 2018 in Psychophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLaura Leuchs
Laura Leuchs
MSMax Schneider
Max Schneider
VSVictor Spoormaker
Victor Spoormaker

1 February 2017 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLaura Leuchs
Laura Leuchs
MSMax Schneider
Max Schneider
MCMichael Czisch
Michael Czisch
VSVictor Spoormaker
Victor Spoormaker

11 May 2020 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBTanja M. Brückl
Tanja M. Brückl
VSVictor Spoormaker
Victor Spoormaker
PSPhilipp G. Sämann
Philipp G. Sämann
ABAnna-Katherine Brem
Anna-Katherine Brem
LHLara Henco
Lara Henco
EBElisabeth B Binder
Elisabeth B Binder
Background: A major research finding in the field of Biological Psychiatry is that symptom-based categories of mental disorders map poorly onto dysfunctions in brain circuits or neurobiological pathways. Many of the identified (neuro) biological dysfunctions are “transdiagnostic”, meaning that they do not reflect diagnostic boundaries but are shared by different ICD/DSM diagnoses. The compromised biological validity of the current classification system for mental disorders impedes rather than supports the development of treatments that not only target symptoms but also the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The Biological Classification of Mental Disorders (BeCOME) study aims to identify biology-based classes of mental disorders that improve the translation of novel biomedical findings into tailored clinical applications. Methods: BeCOME intends to include at least 1000 individuals with a broad spectrum of affective, anxiety and stress-related mental disorders as well as 500 individuals unaffected by mental disorders. After a screening visit, all participants undergo in-depth phenotyping procedures and omics assessments on two consecutive days. Several validated paradigms (e.g., fear conditioning, reward anticipation, imaging stress test, social reward learning task) are applied to stimulate a response in a basic system of human functioning (e.g., acute threat response, reward processing, stress response or social reward learning) that plays a key role in the development of affective, anxiety and stress-related mental disorders. The response to this stimulation is then read out across multiple levels. Assessments comprise genetic, molecular, cellular, physiological, neuroimaging, neurocognitive, psychophysiological and psychometric measurements. The multilevel information collected in BeCOME will be used to identify data-driven biologically-informed categories of mental disorders using cluster analytical techniques. Discussion: The novelty of BeCOME lies in the dynamic in-depth phenotyping and omics characterization of individuals with mental disorders from the depression and anxiety spectrum of varying severity. We believe that such biology-based subclasses of mental disorders will serve as better treatment targets than purely symptom-based disease entities, and help in tailoring the right treatment to the individual patient suffering from a mental disorder. BeCOME has the potential to contribute to a novel taxonomy of mental disorders that integrates the underlying pathomechanisms into diagnoses. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered on June 12, 2019 on ClinicalTrials.gov (TRN: NCT03984084).

19 September 2024 in Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJonas Hagenberg
Jonas Hagenberg
TBTanja M. Brückl
Tanja M. Brückl
MEMira Erhart
Mira Erhart
JKJohannes Kopf-Beck
Johannes Kopf-Beck
MKMaik Ködel
Maik Ködel
JKJanine Knauer-Arloth
Janine Knauer-Arloth
In a subset of patients with mental disorders, such as depression, low-grade inflammation and altered immune marker concentrations are observed. However, these immune alterations are often assessed by only one data type and small marker panels. Here, we used a transdiagnostic approach and combined data from two cohorts to define subgroups of depression symptoms across the diagnostic spectrum through a large-scale multi-omics clustering approach in 237 individuals. The method incorporated age, body mass index (BMI), 43 plasma immune markers and RNA-seq data from peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMCs). Our initial clustering revealed four clusters, including two immune-related depression symptom clusters characterized by elevated BMI, higher depression severity and elevated levels of immune markers such as interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and C-C motif chemokine 2 (CCL2 or MCP-1). In contrast, the RNA-seq data mostly differentiated a cluster with low depression severity, enriched in brain related gene sets. This cluster was also distinguished by electrocardiography data, while structural imaging data revealed differences in ventricle volumes across the clusters. Incorporating predicted cell type proportions into the clustering resulted in three clusters, with one showing elevated immune marker concentrations. The cell type proportion and genes related to cell types were most pronounced in an intermediate depression symptoms cluster, suggesting that RNA-seq and immune markers measure different aspects of immune dysregulation. Lastly, we found a dysregulation of the SERPINF1/VEGF-A pathway that was specific to dendritic cells by integrating immune marker and RNA-seq data. This shows the advantages of combining different data modalities and highlights possible markers for further stratification research of depression symptoms.