Farid Bakir

Prof. Dr. Farid Bakir

Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, CNAM, LIFSE, HESAM University, 75013 Paris, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2019 in Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PZPeiyuan Zuo
Peiyuan Zuo
ATAbbas Tcharkhtchi
Abbas Tcharkhtchi
Mohammadali ShirinbayanMohammadali Shirinbayan
Mohammadali Shirinbayan
JFJoseph Fitoussi
Joseph Fitoussi
Farid BakirFarid Bakir
Farid Bakir

1 June 2014 in International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAmélie Danlos
Amélie Danlos
Florent RaveletFlorent Ravelet
Florent Ravelet
OCOlivier Coutier-Delgosha
Olivier Coutier-Delgosha
Farid BakirFarid Bakir
Farid Bakir

20 February 2006 in Journal of Fluids Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IMImene Mejri
Imene Mejri
Farid BakirFarid Bakir
Farid Bakir
RRRobert Rey
Robert Rey
TBThabet Belamri
Thabet Belamri
The paper presents full 3D numerical simulations and experimental investigations of the cavitating flow through three axial inducers. These inducers are identified by the tip blade angle at the leading edge β1T=8, 10, and 13deg. The numerical and experimental investigations were carried out at the LEMFI laboratory (Laboratoire d’Energétique et de Mécanique de Fluides Interne) of the ENSAM-Paris center (Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers). A review of the cavitating regime modeling and the cavitation homogeneous model used for this paper’s calculations is first presented. The numerical model is based on a combination of the multiphase flow equations with a truncated version of the Rayleigh-Plesset model predicting the complicated growth and collapse processes of bubbles. The mass transfers due to cavitation are source/sink terms in continuity equations of the liquid and vapor phases. The cavitation model also features a solution methodology which implicitly couples the continuity and momentum equations together. The main results are presented for the inducers at a range of flow rates and cavitation numbers: (1) Experimental results concerning: (i) the overall performances: Pressure head coefficient and efficiency versus flow rates; (ii) critical cavitation number (5% and 15% of drop) versus the flow rate; (2) Numerical results concerning: (i) the overall performances; (ii) the numerically investigated water vapor volume fraction distributions and other CFD results, which enable us to explain the cavitating behavior for these inducers; (iii) the location and sizes of the blade cavity and backflow vortex. Finally, the comparisons between experimental and simulated results on the overall performances, cavity sizes and cavity location are discussed. A qualitative agreement between experimental and predicted results was found for two inducers for a range of flow rates. The head breakdown in the simulations started at a different cavitation coefficient than that in the experiment.

1 June 2008 in Journal of Sound and Vibration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sofiane KHELLADISofiane KHELLADI
Sofiane KHELLADI
SKS. Kouidri
S. Kouidri
Farid BakirFarid Bakir
Farid Bakir
RRR. Rey
R. Rey

1 February 2013 in Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Florent RaveletFlorent Ravelet
Florent Ravelet
Farid BakirFarid Bakir
Farid Bakir
Sofiane KHELLADISofiane KHELLADI
Sofiane KHELLADI
RRR. Rey
R. Rey

1 January 2016 in Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PTP. Tomov
P. Tomov
Sofiane KHELLADISofiane KHELLADI
Sofiane KHELLADI
Florent RaveletFlorent Ravelet
Florent Ravelet
CSC. Sarraf
C. Sarraf
Farid BakirFarid Bakir
Farid Bakir
PVP. Vertenoeuil
P. Vertenoeuil