Miguel de la Hoya

Dr. Miguel de la Hoya

Molecular Oncology Laboratory. Fundación Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNasim Mavaddat
Nasim Mavaddat
DBDaniel Barrowdale
Daniel Barrowdale
IAIrene L. Andrulis
Irene L. Andrulis
SDSusan M. Domchek
Susan M. Domchek
DEDiana Eccles
Diana Eccles
AAAntonis C. Antoniou
Antonis C. Antoniou
Background: Previously, small studies have found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors differ in their pathology. Analysis of larger datasets of mutation carriers should allow further tumor characterization. Methods: We used data from 4,325 BRCA1 and 2,568 BRCA2 mutation carriers to analyze the pathology of invasive breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancers. Results: There was strong evidence that the proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast tumors decreased with age at diagnosis among BRCA1 (P-trend = 1.2 × 10−5), but increased with age at diagnosis among BRCA2, carriers (P-trend = 6.8 × 10−6). The proportion of triple-negative tumors decreased with age at diagnosis in BRCA1 carriers but increased with age at diagnosis of BRCA2 carriers. In both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, ER-negative tumors were of higher histologic grade than ER-positive tumors (grade 3 vs. grade 1; P = 1.2 × 10−13 for BRCA1 and P = 0.001 for BRCA2). ER and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were independently associated with mutation carrier status [ER-positive odds ratio (OR) for BRCA2 = 9.4, 95% CI: 7.0–12.6 and PR-positive OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3–2.3, under joint analysis]. Lobular tumors were more likely to be BRCA2-related (OR for BRCA2 = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.4–4.4; P = 4.4 × 10−14), and medullary tumors BRCA1-related (OR for BRCA2 = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18–0.35; P = 2.3 × 10−15). ER-status of the first breast cancer was predictive of ER-status of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (P = 0.0004 for BRCA1; P = 0.002 for BRCA2). There were no significant differences in ovarian cancer morphology between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (serous: 67%; mucinous: 1%; endometrioid: 12%; clear-cell: 2%). Conclusions/Impact: Pathologic characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors may be useful for improving risk-prediction algorithms and informing clinical strategies for screening and prophylaxis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(1); 134–47. ©2011 AACR.

7 April 2015 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRTimothy R. Rebbeck
Timothy R. Rebbeck
NMNandita Mitra
Nandita Mitra
FWFei Wan
Fei Wan
OSOlga M. Sinilnikova
Olga M. Sinilnikova
SHSue Healey
Sue Healey
IAIrene Andrulis
Irene Andrulis
Women who have inherited mutations in BRCA1 (17q21, chromosome 17: base pairs 43,044,294 to 43,125,482) or BRCA2 (13q12.3, chromosome 13: base pairs 32,315,479 to 32,399,671) have an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancers.1,2 Little is known about how cancer risks differ by BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation type. An “ovarian cancer cluster region” (OCCR) has been reported in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 using small sample sets. For BRCA1, initially mutations after exon 11 were associated with a 20% lower ovarian cancer risk than mutations in exons 1 through 11.3 Following that observation, Thompson et al4 reported an increased risk of ovarian vs breast cancer specifically was associated with mutations in the central portion of exon 11. This association was attributed to both a decrease in breast cancer risk and an increase in ovarian cancer risk in this region. Mutations in exon 11 of BRCA2 also have been associated with higher ovarian vs breast cancer risk than in other regions of the gene.5 It was hypothesized that this risk variation might be explained by the failure of BRCA1/2 exon 11 truncating mutations to trigger nonsense-mediated messenger RNA (mRNA) decay (NMD) because of their extremely large size, contrary to truncating mutations in smaller exons. However, this postulate was not supported by the measures of the relative amounts of mRNA transcript encoded by BRCA1/2 alleles.6,7 Murine models of different mutations in BRCA1/2 also suggest that genotype-phenotype correlations exist.8,9 Quiz Ref ID To our knowledge, no study has reported whether BRCA1/2 mutation type is associated with differences in breast and ovarian cancer risk. Thus, we evaluated whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation type or location is associated with variation in breast and ovarian cancer risk.

30 March 2008 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCThe CORGI Consortium
The CORGI Consortium
ITIan Pm Tomlinson
Ian Pm Tomlinson
TCThe EPICOLON Consortium
The EPICOLON Consortium
EWEmily Webb
Emily Webb
LCLuis Carvajal-Carmona
Luis Carvajal-Carmona
Richard HoulstonRichard Houlston
Richard Houlston

15 February 2018 in Human Mutation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TRTimothy R. Rebbeck
Timothy R. Rebbeck
TFTara M. Friebel
Tara M. Friebel
EFEitan Friedman
Eitan Friedman
UHUte Hamann
Ute Hamann
DHDezheng Huo
Dezheng Huo
KNKatherine L. Nathanson
Katherine L. Nathanson

25 January 2022 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLShuai Li
Shuai Li
VSValentina Silvestri
Valentina Silvestri
GLGoska Leslie
Goska Leslie
TRTimothy R. Rebbeck
Timothy R. Rebbeck
SNSusan L. Neuhausen
Susan L. Neuhausen
AAAntonis C. Antoniou
Antonis C. Antoniou
PURPOSE: To provide precise age-specific risk estimates of cancers other than female breast and ovarian cancers associated with pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 for effective cancer risk management. METHODS: We used data from 3,184 BRCA1 and 2,157 BRCA2 families in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 to estimate age-specific relative (RR) and absolute risks for 22 first primary cancer types adjusting for family ascertainment. RESULTS: BRCA1 PVs were associated with risks of male breast (RR = 4.30; 95% CI, 1.09 to 16.96), pancreatic (RR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.51 to 3.68), and stomach (RR = 2.17; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.77) cancers. Associations with colorectal and gallbladder cancers were also suggested. BRCA2 PVs were associated with risks of male breast (RR = 44.0; 95% CI, 21.3 to 90.9), stomach (RR = 3.69; 95% CI, 2.40 to 5.67), pancreatic (RR = 3.34; 95% CI, 2.21 to 5.06), and prostate (RR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.63 to 3.03) cancers. The stomach cancer RR was higher for females than males (6.89 v 2.76; P = .04). The absolute risks to age 80 years ranged from 0.4% for male breast cancer to approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer for BRCA1 carriers and from approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer to 27% for prostate cancer for BRCA2 carriers. CONCLUSION: In addition to female breast and ovarian cancers, BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs are associated with increased risks of male breast, pancreatic, stomach, and prostate (only BRCA2 PVs) cancers, but not with the risks of other previously suggested cancers. The estimated age-specific risks will refine cancer risk management in men and women with BRCA1/2 PVs.

19 September 2010 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEmbrace
Embrace
AAAntonis C Antoniou
Antonis C Antoniou
GCGEMO Study Collaborators
GEMO Study Collaborators
HEHebon
Hebon
KFk Con Fab
k Con Fab
FCFergus J Couch
Fergus J Couch